Literature DB >> 35091444

Phase I Clinical Trial of DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitor Decitabine and PARP Inhibitor Talazoparib Combination Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Maria R Baer1,2, Aksinija A Kogan3, Søren M Bentzen2,4, Tian Mi5, Rena G Lapidus1,2, Vu H Duong1,2, Ashkan Emadi1,2,6, Sandrine Niyongere1,2, Casey L O'Connell7, Benjamin A Youngblood5, Stephen B Baylin8, Feyruz V Rassool2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for, or resistant to, intensive chemotherapy are often treated with DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi). Novel combinations may increase efficacy. In addition to demethylating CpG island gene promoter regions, DNMTis enhance PARP1 recruitment and tight binding to chromatin, preventing PARP-mediated DNA repair, downregulating homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, and sensitizing cells to PARP inhibitor (PARPi). We previously demonstrated DNMTi and PARPi combination efficacy in AML in vitro and in vivo. Here, we report a phase I clinical trial combining the DNMTi decitabine and the PARPi talazoparib in relapsed/refractory AML. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Decitabine and talazoparib doses were escalated using a 3 + 3 design. Pharmacodynamic studies were performed on cycle 1 days 1 (pretreatment), 5 and 8 blood blasts.
RESULTS: Doses were escalated in seven cohorts [25 patients, including 22 previously treated with DNMTi(s)] to a recommended phase II dose combination of decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 or 10 days and talazoparib 1 mg orally daily for 28 days, in 28-day cycles. Grade 3-5 events included fever in 19 patients and lung infections in 15, attributed to AML. Responses included complete remission with incomplete count recovery in two patients (8%) and hematologic improvement in three. Pharmacodynamic studies showed the expected DNA demethylation, increased PARP trapping in chromatin, increased γH2AX foci, and decreased HR activity in responders. γH2AX foci increased significantly with increasing talazoparib doses combined with 20 mg/m2 decitabine.
CONCLUSIONS: Decitabine/talazoparib combination was well tolerated. Expected pharmacodynamic effects occurred, especially in responders. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35091444      PMCID: PMC8976746          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  34 in total

1.  Decitabine in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ellen K Ritchie; Eric J Feldman; Paul J Christos; Sarah D Rohan; Catherine B Lagassa; Cindy Ippoliti; Joseph M Scandura; Karen Carlson; Gail J Roboz
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2013-02-07

2.  Clinical response and miR-29b predictive significance in older AML patients treated with a 10-day schedule of decitabine.

Authors:  William Blum; Ramiro Garzon; Rebecca B Klisovic; Sebastian Schwind; Alison Walker; Susan Geyer; Shujun Liu; Violaine Havelange; Heiko Becker; Larry Schaaf; Jon Mickle; Hollie Devine; Cheryl Kefauver; Steven M Devine; Kenneth K Chan; Nyla A Heerema; Clara D Bloomfield; Michael R Grever; John C Byrd; Miguel Villalona-Calero; Carlo M Croce; Guido Marcucci
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Lübbert; Björn H Rüter; Rainer Claus; Claudia Schmoor; Mathias Schmid; Ulrich Germing; Andrea Kuendgen; Volker Rethwisch; Arnold Ganser; Uwe Platzbecker; Oliver Galm; Wolfram Brugger; Gerhard Heil; Björn Hackanson; Barbara Deschler; Konstanze Döhner; Anne Hagemeijer; Pierre W Wijermans; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Multicenter, phase II study of decitabine for the first-line treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Amanda F Cashen; Gary J Schiller; Margaret R O'Donnell; John F DiPersio
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.

Authors:  Maximilian Stahl; Michelle DeVeaux; Pau Montesinos; Raphael Itzykson; Ellen K Ritchie; Mikkael A Sekeres; John D Barnard; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Andrew M Brunner; Rami S Komrokji; Vijaya R Bhatt; Aref Al-Kali; Thomas Cluzeau; Valeria Santini; Amir T Fathi; Gail J Roboz; Pierre Fenaux; Mark R Litzow; Sarah Perreault; Tae Kon Kim; Thomas Prebet; Norbert Vey; Vivek Verma; Ulrich Germing; Juan Miguel Bergua; Josefina Serrano; Steven D Gore; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Pharmacologic induction of innate immune signaling directly drives homologous recombination deficiency.

Authors:  Lena J McLaughlin; Lora Stojanovic; Aksinija A Kogan; Julia L Rutherford; Eun Yong Choi; Ray-Whay Chiu Yen; Limin Xia; Ying Zou; Rena G Lapidus; Stephen B Baylin; Michael J Topper; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Efficacy of 10-day decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Ian M Bouligny; Vivek Mehta; Scott Isom; Leslie R Ellis; Rupali R Bhave; Dianna S Howard; Susan Lyerly; Megan Manuel; Sarah Dralle; Bayard L Powell; Timothy S Pardee
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.156

9.  Cohesin mutations alter DNA damage repair and chromatin structure and create therapeutic vulnerabilities in MDS/AML.

Authors:  Zuzana Tothova; Anne-Laure Valton; Rebecca A Gorelov; Mounica Vallurupalli; John M Krill-Burger; Amie Holmes; Catherine C Landers; J Erika Haydu; Edyta Malolepsza; Christina Hartigan; Melanie Donahue; Katerina D Popova; Sebastian Koochaki; Sergey V Venev; Jeanne Rivera; Edwin Chen; Kasper Lage; Monica Schenone; Alan D D'Andrea; Steven A Carr; Elizabeth A Morgan; Job Dekker; Benjamin L Ebert
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2021-02-08

10.  Antileukemic Efficacy in Vitro of Talazoparib and APE1 Inhibitor III Combined with Decitabine in Myeloid Malignancies.

Authors:  Vanessa Kohl; Johanna Flach; Nicole Naumann; Susanne Brendel; Helga Kleiner; Christel Weiss; Wolfgang Seifarth; Daniel Nowak; Wolf-Karsten Hofmann; Alice Fabarius; Henning D Popp
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic Induction of BRCAness in BRCA-Proficient Cancers: Expanding PARP Inhibitor Use.

Authors:  Rachel Abbotts; Anna J Dellomo; Feyruz V Rassool
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Enhanced Cytotoxicity on Cancer Cells by Combinational Treatment of PARP Inhibitor and 5-Azadeoxycytidine Accompanying Distinct Transcriptional Profiles.

Authors:  Tomonori Araki; Kensuke Hamada; Aung Bhone Myat; Hideki Ogino; Kohei Hayashi; Miho Maeda; Ying Tong; Yasufumi Murakami; Kazuhiko Nakao; Mitsuko Masutani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Role of PARP Inhibitors in Glioblastoma and Perceiving Challenges as Well as Strategies for Successful Clinical Development.

Authors:  Priya Bisht; V Udaya Kumar; Ruchi Pandey; Ravichandiran Velayutham; Nitesh Kumar
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 4.  DNA Methylation Malleability and Dysregulation in Cancer Progression: Understanding the Role of PARP1.

Authors:  Rakesh Srivastava; Niraj Lodhi
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.