Literature DB >> 25735684

The epidemiology of sepsis during rapid response team reviews in a teaching hospital.

G Cross1, I Bilgrami2, G Eastwood3, P Johnson4, B P Howden5, R Bellomo6, D Jones7.   

Abstract

In a three-month retrospective study, we assessed the proportion of rapid response team (RRT) calls associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis. We also documented the site of infection (whether it was community- or hospital-acquired), antibiotic modifications after the call and in-hospital outcomes. Amongst 358 RRT calls, two or more SIRS criteria were present in 277 (77.4%). Amongst the 277 RRT calls with SIRS criteria, 159 (57.4%) fulfilled sepsis criteria in the 24 hours before and 12 hours after the call. There were 118 of 277 (42.6%) calls with SIRS criteria but no evidence of sepsis and 62 of 277 (22.3%) calls associated with both criteria for sepsis as well as an alternative cause for SIRS. Hence, 159 (44.4%) of all 358 RRT calls over the three-month study period fulfilled criteria for sepsis and in 97 (159-62) (27.1%) of the 358 calls, there were criteria for sepsis without other causes for SIRS criteria. The most common sites of infection were respiratory tract (86), abdominal cavity (38), urinary tract (26) and bloodstream (26). Infection was hospital-acquired in 91 (57.2%) and community-acquired in 67 (42.1%) cases, respectively. Patients were on antibiotics in 127 of 159 (79.9%) cases before the RRT call and antibiotics were added or modified in 76 of 159 (47.8%) cases after RRT review. The hospital length-of-stay of patients who received an RRT call associated with sepsis was longer than those who did not (16.0 [8.0 to 28.5] versus 10 days [6.0 to 18.0]; P=0.002).

Entities:  

Keywords:  deteriorating patient; medical emergency team; rapid response team; sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25735684     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1504300208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  10 in total

Review 1.  Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Manu Shankar-Hari; Gary S Phillips; Mitchell L Levy; Christopher W Seymour; Vincent X Liu; Clifford S Deutschman; Derek C Angus; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Frank Bloos; Hendrik Rüddel; Daniel Thomas-Rüddel; Daniel Schwarzkopf; Christine Pausch; Stephan Harbarth; Torsten Schreiber; Matthias Gründling; John Marshall; Philipp Simon; Mitchell M Levy; Manfred Weiss; Andreas Weyland; Herwig Gerlach; Tobias Schürholz; Christoph Engel; Claudia Matthäus-Krämer; Christian Scheer; Friedhelm Bach; Reimer Riessen; Bernhard Poidinger; Karin Dey; Norbert Weiler; Andreas Meier-Hellmann; Helene H Häberle; Gabriele Wöbker; Udo X Kaisers; Konrad Reinhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Richard S Hotchkiss; Lyle L Moldawer; Steven M Opal; Konrad Reinhart; Isaiah R Turnbull; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 52.329

4.  Relationship between the presence of dedicated doctors in rapid response systems and patient outcome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Kim; Kyeongman Jeon; Byung Ju Kang; Jong-Joon Ahn; Sang-Bum Hong; Dong-Hyun Lee; Jae Young Moon; Jung Soo Kim; Jisoo Park; Jae Hwa Cho; Sang-Min Lee; Yeon Joo Lee
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 5.  Improving the Recognition of, and Response to In-Hospital Sepsis.

Authors:  Peter Chan; Sandra Peake; Rinaldo Bellomo; Daryl Jones
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.725

6.  Recognizing and managing sepsis: what needs to be done?

Authors:  Donald M Yealy; David T Huang; Anthony Delaney; Marian Knight; Adrienne G Randolph; Ron Daniels; Tim Nutbeam
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Prognostic accuracy of the Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS) and the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) among hospitalized patients assessed by a rapid response team.

Authors:  Shannon M Fernando; Alison E Fox-Robichaud; Bram Rochwerg; Pierre Cardinal; Andrew J E Seely; Jeffrey J Perry; Daniel I McIsaac; Alexandre Tran; Steven Skitch; Benjamin Tam; Michael Hickey; Peter M Reardon; Peter Tanuseputro; Kwadwo Kyeremanteng
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Rapid Response System Activation in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Marcus Robertson; Andy K H Lim; Ashley Bloom; William Chung; Andrew Tsoi; Elise Cannan; Ben Johnstone; Andrew Huynh; Tessa O'Halloran; Paul Gow; Peter Angus; Daryl Jones
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Current aspects in sepsis approach. Turning things around.

Authors:  F J Candel; M Borges Sá; S Belda; G Bou; J L Del Pozo; O Estrada; R Ferrer; J González Del Castillo; A Julián-Jiménez; I Martín-Loeches; E Maseda; M Matesanz; P Ramírez; J T Ramos; J Rello; B Suberviola; A Suárez de la Rica; P Vidal
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.553

10.  Comparison of the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment and adult sepsis pathway in predicting adverse outcomes among adult patients in general wards: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Ling Li; Kasun Rathnayake; Malcolm Green; Amith Shetty; Mary Fullick; Scott Walter; Catriona Middleton-Rennie; Michael Meller; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Harvey Lander; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.048

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.