Rens Van de Schoot1,2. 1. Department of Methods and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; a.g.j.vandeschoot@uu.nl. 2. Optentia Research Program, Faculty of Humanities, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Statistical models to estimate individual change over time and to investigate the existence of latent trajectories, where individuals belong to trajectories that are unobserved (latent), are becoming ever more popular. Such models are called Latent Growth Mixture Models (LGMM; Muthén & Muthén, 2000) and are often applied to estimate posttraumatic stress (PTSD) trajectories across several months/years following a traumatic event (Armour, Shevlin, Elklit, & Mroczek, 2012; Berntsen et al., 2012; Bonanno et al., 2012; Forbes et al., 2010; Galatzer-Levy et al., 2013; Mouthaan et al., 2013; Van de Schoot, Broere, Perryck, Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, & Van Loey, 2015; Van Loey, Van de Schoot, & Faber, 2012). The purpose of LGMM is to search for “hidden” subpopulations that are characterized by a different developmental process (growth trajectory). With LGMM it is hypothesized that there are different latent classes each with their own growth model.Supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, an international meeting was organized to present the current state of affairs concerning LGMM to investigate the causes and consequences of PTSD. Three key aspects of LGMM and its application in the field of psychotrauma were presented in the old University Hall at Utrecht University (founded in 1462), The Netherlands. The first presentation introduced LGMM and provided guidelines on which models to run, how to interpret the results, and what to report in a paper (Van de Schoot, 2015). The second presentation discussed the current state of affairs in applying LGMM models to PTSD data (Galatzer-Levy, 2015). The last presentation demonstrated that only the Bayesian approach results in a theory-driven solution of estimating the delayed onset trajectory (Depaoli, Van de Schoot, Van Loey, & Sijbrandij, 2015).The meeting was endorsed by the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS), and part of the ISTSS global meetings program. “We are excited about new and advanced statistical techniques, in particular Bayesian LGMM, since these can answer new research questions and deal with commonly encountered problems like having to deal with small data sets” (Olff, 2015).
Authors: George A Bonanno; Anthony D Mancini; Jaime L Horton; Teresa M Powell; Cynthia A Leardmann; Edward J Boyko; Timothy S Wells; Tomoko I Hooper; Gary D Gackstetter; Tyler C Smith Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Isaac R Galatzer-Levy; Yael Ankri; Sara Freedman; Yossi Israeli-Shalev; Pablo Roitman; Moran Gilad; Arieh Y Shalev Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joanne Mouthaan; Marit Sijbrandij; Giel-Jan de Vries; Johannes B Reitsma; Rens van de Schoot; J Carel Goslings; Jan S K Luitse; Fred C Bakker; Berthold P R Gersons; Miranda Olff Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-08-13 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Rens van de Schoot; Joris J Broere; Koen H Perryck; Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg; Nancy E van Loey Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol Date: 2015-03-11
Authors: Sarah R Lowe; Andrew Ratanatharathorn; Betty S Lai; Willem van der Mei; Anna C Barbano; Richard A Bryant; Douglas L Delahanty; Yutaka J Matsuoka; Miranda Olff; Ulrich Schnyder; Eugene Laska; Karestan C Koenen; Arieh Y Shalev; Ronald C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Zheng-An Lu; Le Shi; Jian-Yu Que; Yong-Bo Zheng; Qian-Wen Wang; Wei-Jian Liu; Yue-Tong Huang; Xiao-Xing Liu; Kai Yuan; Wei Yan; Jie Shi; Yan-Ping Bao; Lin Lu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390