Literature DB >> 25733962

Fauna europaea: Diptera - brachycera.

Thomas Pape1, Paul Beuk2, Adrian Charles Pont3, Anatole I Shatalkin4, Andrey L Ozerov4, Andrzej J Woźnica5, Bernhard Merz6, Cezary Bystrowski7, Chris Raper8, Christer Bergström9, Christian Kehlmaier10, David K Clements11, David Greathead12, Elena Petrovna Kameneva13, Emilia Nartshuk14, Frederik T Petersen15, Gisela Weber16, Gerhard Bächli17, Fritz Geller-Grimm18, Guy Van de Weyer19, Hans-Peter Tschorsnig20, Herman de Jong21, Jan-Willem van Zuijlen22, Jaromír Vaňhara23, Jindřich Roháček24, Joachim Ziegler25, József Majer26, Karel Hůrka27, Kevin Holston28, Knut Rognes29, Lita Greve-Jensen30, Lorenzo Munari31, Marc de Meyer32, Marc Pollet33, Martin C D Speight34, Martin John Ebejer35, Michel Martinez36, Miguel Carles-Tolrá37, Mihály Földvári38, Milan Chvála27, Miroslav Barták39, Neal L Evenhuis40, Peter J Chandler41, Pierfilippo Cerretti42, Rudolf Meier43, Rudolf Rozkosny23, Sabine Prescher16, Stephen D Gaimari44, Tadeusz Zatwarnicki45, Theo Zeegers46, Torsten Dikow47, Valery A Korneyev13, Vera Andreevna Richter14, Verner Michelsen1, Vitali N Tanasijtshuk14, Wayne N Mathis47, Zdravko Hubenov48, Yde de Jong49.   

Abstract

Fauna Europaea provides a public web-service with an index of scientific names (including important synonyms) of all extant multicellular European terrestrial and freshwater animals and their geographical distribution at the level of countries and major islands (east of the Urals and excluding the Caucasus region). The Fauna Europaea project comprises about 230,000 taxonomic names, including 130,000 accepted species and 14,000 accepted subspecies, which is much more than the originally projected number of 100,000 species. Fauna Europaea represents a huge effort by more than 400 contributing taxonomic specialists throughout Europe and is a unique (standard) reference suitable for many user communities in science, government, industry, nature conservation and education. The Diptera-Brachycera is one of the 58 Fauna Europaea major taxonomic groups, and data have been compiled by a network of 55 specialists. Within the two-winged insects (Diptera), the Brachycera constitute a monophyletic group, which is generally given rank of suborder. The Brachycera may be classified into the probably paraphyletic 'lower brachyceran grade' and the monophyletic Eremoneura. The latter contains the Empidoidea, the Apystomyioidea with a single Nearctic species, and the Cyclorrhapha, which in turn is divided into the paraphyletic 'aschizan grade' and the monophyletic Schizophora. The latter is traditionally divided into the paraphyletic 'acalyptrate grade' and the monophyletic Calyptratae. Our knowledge of the European fauna of Diptera-Brachycera varies tremendously among families, from the reasonably well known hoverflies (Syrphidae) to the extremely poorly known scuttle flies (Phoridae). There has been a steady growth in our knowledge of European Diptera for the last two centuries, with no apparent slow down, but there is a shift towards a larger fraction of the new species being found among the families of the nematoceran grade (lower Diptera), which due to a larger number of small-sized species may be considered as taxonomically more challenging. Most of Europe is highly industrialised and has a high human population density, and the more fertile habitats are extensively cultivated. This has undoubtedly increased the extinction risk for numerous species of brachyceran flies, yet with the recent re-discovery of Thyreophoracynophila (Panzer), there are no known cases of extinction at a European level. However, few national Red Lists have extensive information on Diptera. For the Diptera-Brachycera, data from 96 families containing 11,751 species are included in this paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biodiversity Informatics; Brachycera; Diptera; Fauna Europaea; Taxonomic indexing; biodiversity; taxonomy; zoology

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733962      PMCID: PMC4339814          DOI: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodivers Data J        ISSN: 1314-2828


Introduction

In 1998 the European Commission published the European Community Biodiversity Strategy, providing a framework for the development of Community policies and instruments in order to comply with the Convention on Biological Diversity. The Strategy recognised the current incomplete state of knowledge at all levels of biodiversity, a state which makes a successful implementation of the Convention difficult. Fauna Europaea was conceived to contribute to this Strategy by supporting one of the main themes: to identify and catalogue the components of the European biodiversity, with the cataloguing implemented as a taxonomic and faunistic database serving as a basic tool for scientific documentation and discovery, environmental management, and conservation policies/priorities. With regard to biodiversity in Europe, science and policies depend on sufficient knowledge of the relevant components. The assessment of biodiversity, including monitoring changes and ensuring sustainable exploitation, as well as much legislative work, depend upon a validated taxonomic overview, in which Fauna Europaea will play a major role by providing a web-based information infrastructure with an index of scientific names (including the most important synonyms) of all living European multicellular terrestrial and freshwater animals, their geographical distribution at the level of countries and major islands, and some relevant additional information. Fauna Europaea (FAEU) kicked off in 2000 as an EC-FP5 four-year project, delivering its first release in 2004 (de Jong et al. 2014). This online-only version has continuously been updated, and after a further decade of steady progress, to efficiently disseminate the results of Fauna Europaea and to properly credit the Fauna Europaea contributors, modern e-publishing tools are being applied to prepare data papers on all 58 major taxonomic groups. For this purpose a special Biodiversity Data Journal Series has been compiled, called Contributions on Fauna Europaea (see also: Pensoft News item 17 Dec 2014). This work was initiated during the ViBRANT project and is further supported by the recently started EU BON project. This paper is the first publication from the Fauna Europaea – data sector as a BDJ data paper in the Fauna Europaea series, and further contributions should be expected when warranted by major updates. In the EU BON project (Hoffmann et al. 2014) further steps will be made to implement Fauna Europaea as a basic tool and standard reference for biodiversity research and as a means to facilitate taxonomic expertise evaluation and management in Europe. The Fauna Europaea data papers will contribute to a quality assessment on biodiversity data by providing estimates on gaps in our taxonomic information and knowledge.

General description

Purpose

Fauna Europaea is a database of the scientific names and distributions (at national or in some cases regional level) of all currently known extant multicellular European terrestrial and freshwater animal species. The database has been assembled by a large network of taxonomic specialists. An extended description of the Fauna Europaea project can be found in de Jong et al. 2014. A summary is given in the sections below. The – is one of the 58 Fauna Europaea major taxonomic groups, covering 11,751 species (Table 1), and the data have been gathered by a network of 55 specialists (Tables 1, 3).
Table 1.

Taxonomic specialists per family for – and their responsibilities. Expert replacements to be implemented for coming versions are given in Table 2. The actual numbers of databased species are given per family. For most families is also given an indication of the actual number of known/described species (showing a potential information gap) plus an estimate of the total number of existing species (i.e., described/known plus undescribed/undiscovered) for Europe.

TAXONOMYEUROPE
FAMILYSPECIALIST(S)DATABASED SPECIES (Fauna Europaea)TOTAL RECORDED SPECIES (information-gap)TOTAL ESTIMATED SPECIES (knowledge-gap)
Acartophthalmidae Andrey L. Ozerov333-4
Acroceridae Emilia P. Nartshuk343434
Agromyzidae Michel Martinez906910>1200
Anthomyiidae Verner Michelsen508508570
Anthomyzidae Jindřich Roháček283235
Asilidae Fritz Geller-Grimm524584
Asteiidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá182124
Atelestidae Milan Chvála433
Athericidae Rudolf Rozkosny101010
Aulacigastridae Miguel Carles-Tolrá444
Bombyliidae David J. Greathead [deceased] — Neal Evenhuis [follow-up]335335355
Borboropsidae Andrzej J. Woznica222
Braulidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá333
Calliphoridae Knut Rognes114115130
Camillidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá8910
Campichoetidae Peter J. Chandler777
Canacidae Wayne N. Mathis458
Carnidae Andrej L. Ozerov394655
Chamaemyiidae Stephen D. Gaimari107109128
Chiropteromyzidae Andrzej J. Woznica222
Chloropidae Emilia P. Nartshuk394412475
Chyromyidae Martin John Ebejer596474
Clusiidae Jindřich Roháček & Bernhard Merz141415
Cnemospathididae Andrzej J. Woźnica011
Coelopidae Rudolf Meier333
Coenomyiidae Rudolf Rozkosny111
Conopidae David K. Clements848490
Cryptochetidae Emilia P. Nartshuk333
Curtonotidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá111
Diastatidae Peter J. Chandler999
Diopsidae Rudolf Meier111
Dolichopodidae Marc Pollet773796900
Drosophilidae Gerhard Bächli121122
Dryomyzidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá444
Empididae Milan Chvála816860
Ephydridae Tadeusz Zatwarnicki337340340
Fanniidae Adrian C. Pont83
Helcomyzidae Rudolf Meier222
Heleomyzidae Andrzej J. Woznica150152165
Heterocheilidae Rudolf Meier111
Hilarimorphidae Thomas Pape — Christian Kehlmaier [follow-up]222
Hippoboscidae Frederik T. Petersen3030
Hybotidae Milan Chvála442470
Lauxaniidae Bernhard Merz157
Lonchaeidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá — Thomas Pape [follow-up]96102110
Lonchopteridae Miroslav Barták131111
Megamerinidae Andrej L. Ozerov111
Micropezidae Andrej L. Ozerov222225
Microphoridae Milan Chvála1720
Milichiidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá434548
Muscidae Adrian C. Pont572
Mydidae David J. Greathead [deceased] — Torsten Dikow [follow-up]568
Mythicomyiidae David J. Greathead [deceased] — Neal Evenhuis [follow-up]303270
Nannodastiidae Martin John Ebejer334
Nemestrinidae David J. Greathead [deceased] — Torsten Dikow [follow-up]131315
Nycteribiidae Karel Hůrka [deceased] — Mihály Földvári [follow-up]151620
Odiniidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá141516
Oestridae Thomas Pape222222
Opetiidae Peter J. Chandler111
Opomyzidae Jan-Willem van Zuijlen333336
Pallopteridae Bernhard Merz — Miguel Carles-Tolrá [follow-up]232324
Periscelididae (incl. Stenomicridae)Miguel Carles-Tolrá679
Phaeomyiidae Rudolf Rozkosny333
Phoridae Gisela Weber & Sabine Prescher656>1500
Piophilidae Andrey L. Ozerov293135
Pipunculidae Marc de Meyer — Christian Kehlmaier [follow-up]200205230
Platypezidae Peter J. Chandler434553
Platystomatidae Valery A. Korneyev212125
Pseudopomyzidae Bernhard Merz — Miguel Carles-Tolrá [follow-up]111
Psilidae Thomas Pape474955
Pyrgotidae Bernhard Merz — Valery A. Korneyev [follow-up]122
Rachiceridae Rudolf Rozkosny111
Rhagionidae József Majer858590
Rhinophoridae Thomas Pape454855
Sarcophagidae Thomas Pape309350
Scathophagidae Herman de Jong158
Scenopinidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá161618
Sciomyzidae Rudolf Rozkosny136138145
Sepsidae Rudolf Meier484550
Sphaeroceridae Jindřich Roháček257260>270
Stratiomyidae Rudolf Rozkosny141140145
Streblidae Karel Hůrka [deceased] — Mihály Földvári [follow-up]112
Strongylophthalmyiidae Thomas Pape222
Syrphidae Martin C. D. Speight829875950
Tabanidae Milan Chvála213220
Tachinidae Hans-Peter Tschorsnig877897920
Tanypezidae Jindřich Roháček111
Tephritidae Valery A. Korneyev267267275
Tethinidae Lorenzo Munari343334
Therevidae Kevin C. Holston99102120
Trixoscelididae Andrzej J. Woznica262740
Ulidiidae Elena P. Kameneva & Lita Greve-Jensen106106114
Vermileonidae Thomas Pape — Christian Kehlmaier [follow-up]9925
Xenasteiidae Miguel Carles-Tolrá123
Xylomyidae Rudolf Rozkosny888
Xylophagidae Rudolf Rozkosny555
Table 3.

Associated Specialists for – and their responsibilities.

TAXONOMIC GROUP or GEOGRAPHIC AREASPECIALIST
<Norway>Lita Greve-Jensen
<Spain>, <Portugal>, <Andorra>Miguel Carles-Tolrá
Lauxaniidae Anatole I. Shatalkin
Bombyliidae, MythicomyiidaeNeal L. Evenhuis
Tachinidae Christer Bergström
Tachinidae Pierfilippo Cerretti
Tachinidae Vera Richter [deceased]
Tachinidae Zdravko Hubenov
Tachinidae Theo Zeegers
Tachinidae Chris Raper
Tachinidae Cezary Bystrowski
Tachinidae Joachim Ziegler
Tachinidae Jaromír Vaňhara
Tachinidae Guy Van de Weyer
Chamaemyiidae Vitali N. Tanasijtshuk

Additional information

are usually classified into the 'nematoceran grade' or 'lower ' and the monophyletic . The may in turn be classified into the probably paraphyletic 'lower ' and the monophyletic . The latter contains the , the Apystomyioidea with a single Nearctic species, and the , which in turn are divided into the paraphyletic 'aschizan grade' and the monophyletic . The latter are traditionally divided into the paraphyletic 'acalyptrate grade' and the monophyletic (Yeates and Wiegmann 1999, Wiegmann et al. 2011, Lambkin et al. 2013). increase in the relative proportion of the insect fauna at increasing altitude as well as at higher latitudes, whether counting the number of species or the number of individuals. In Europe, are surpassed only by the in the total number of species, but are the predominant insect group in high montane, subarctic, and arctic environments. Europe lies mainly in the temperate climate zone, and its species diversity is relatively poor, being heavily influenced by the Quaternary glaciations. With some 12,000 species of and 7,000 species of the nematoceran grade (lower ), the European fauna of is comparable to those of the Nearctic (ca. 22,000), Afrotropical (ca. 20,000), Oriental (ca. 23,000) and Australasian (ca. 19,000) regions (Pape et al. 2009). The knowledge of the taxonomic composition of the European fauna may therefore be considered as far more complete than for any other major region. This relates to historical circumstances, with Europe having a much longer taxonomic tradition and with relatively more funding being available to the European taxasphere. The number of species added to the European fauna has been remarkably constant over time, and the species accumulation curve shows to date no signs of levelling off (Pape 2009, Fontaine et al. 2012, Pape, unpubl.). Among the , the most species-rich families in the European fauna are the , , , and . Much remains to be discovered, and especially the stand out as potentially vastly more diverse than suggested by the current count. are ecologically very diverse (Hövemeyer 2000). Many of the 'lower ' are predatory in the larval stage, with the parasitic , and as significant exceptions. The include a large assemblage of species with predatory adult and larval stages. Many lineages within the species-rich have adapted to a saprophagous larval life, but also parasitism and predation have evolved numerous times within this group, e.g., millipede parasitising and (in part: Robineau-Desvoidy); mollusc parasitising and (in part, e.g., ); insect parasitising , , , and (in part, e.g., Loew); woodlouse parasitising ; mammal parasitising ; plant parasitising , , (in part), (in part) and (in part); and insect predating , (in part), (in part), (in part) and (in part). The genera Zetterstedt () and Brauer & Bergenstamm and Meigen (both ) deserve special mention because they contain species that are parasitoids of other (in this case ), and spp. may be the only European fly species that parasitise adult (Koenig and Young 2007). The present a remarkable diversity of life habits, ranging from extreme specialisations like the ladybird parasitising species of Enderlein to the 'omnivorous' (Loew), which has been bred from an astonishingly broad range of organic materials even including shoe polish and paint (Disney 1994). Shore flies () are magnificently tolerant of extreme environments, such as hot springs, saline and alkaline waters, and even crude oil (references in Mathis and Zatwarnicki 1995). The are well known for the mimetism of many adults and the multitude of larval life forms, with some of the more classic examples including rat-tails living in putrid water, free-living aphid predators, bulb miners, and inquilines and scavengers in nests of ants, bees and social wasps (Thompson and Rotheray 1998). Brachyceran flies contain several important agricultural pests, like cabbage flies ( spp., ), shoot flies ( spp., ), frit flies [ (Linnaeus), ], and fruit flies [e.g., (Wiedemann) and (Rossi), ); others are blood-sucking, like the horn fly [ (Linnaeus), ] and the false stable fly [ (Fallén) ]; or vectors of various diseases like the bovine filariasis transmitted by some species of Linnaeus (Krafsur and Moon 1997). Flies may be a nuisance when occurring in vast numbers around landfills, garbage dumps, or dung-heaps (Howard 2001). Particularly remarkable cases of mass occurrences are given by the chloropid fly (Meigen), specimens of which, possibly guided by a species-specific male pheromone, seek suitable places for overwintering and in extreme cases may enter buildings in such numbers that they darken the ceilings and create bucket-loads of dead bodies when they die in the dry indoor climate (Nartshuk 2000). On the beneficial side, many are efficient decomposers and play an important role in cleaning sewage and recycling organic waste (McLean 2000); some hover flies () and grass flies () are predators on pest aphids (Ismay and Nartshuk 2000, Thompson and Rotheray 1998) and larvae of the long-legged fly genus () feed on all stages of bark beetles (, ) (Hulcr et al. 2005); and blow flies () may serve as forensic indicators (Catts and Goff 1992, Byrd and Castner 2000, Rivers and Dahlem 2014) and even improve human health through the treatment of complicated wounds (Sherman 2001, Sherman 2002, Sherman 2003). Meigen () has become the archetype of a geneticists laboratory animal, and the multitude of genetic studies performed on this species has had a profound impact on our understanding of gene expression, gene regulatory mechanisms, mutations, etc. (see references in Courtney et al. 2009). One European brachyceran recently considered as extinct (Fontaine et al. 2007, Pape 2009) was rediscovered in Spain in this decade (Carles-Tolrá et al. 2010, Martín-Vega et al. 2010, Zaldivar Ezquerro et al. 2011, Carles-Tolrá and Cañete Saiz 2012): the bone-skipper (Panzer) (: Thyreophorinae) was, around 1800, frequently encountered on larger carrion like dogs, mules, and horses in very early spring (Séguy 1950). The present-day rareness of this morphologically quite conspicuous species may be due to changes in livestock management and improved carrion disposal following the Industrial Revolution in Europe. The growth in human population and the associated reduction in the number of large predators may also have played a part, as this has meant fewer large carcasses with partly crushed long bones, which appears to be one of the favoured breeding media for . The distributional pattern of European keeps changing, and the underlying causes may not always be evident. For example, the cold-adapted species (Wahlgren) () has been newly recorded from areas in Central Europe where it was previously unrecorded (Preisler and Roháček 2012, Soszyńska-Maj and Woźnica 2012). This is in contrast to the current climate change related to global warming during recent decades. Another species, (Enderlein) (Cnemospathididae) was probably accidentally introduced from South Africa by bird migrations to one of the British Isles (Ismay and Smith 1994, Cole 1996), and being a parthenogenetic species with larvae developing in bird guano, it has spread to one of the East Frisian Islands (Stuke and Merz 2005).

Project description

Title

This BDJ data paper includes the taxonomic indexing efforts in Fauna Europaea on European – covering the first two versions of Fauna Europaea (up to version 2.6).

Personnel

The taxonomic framework of Fauna Europaea includes scientists from the 34 partner institutes, which together with a number of citizen scientists provide the taxonomic expertise and faunistic quality assurance and take care of data collation. Every taxonomic group is covered by at least one Group Coordinator responsible for the supervision and integrated input of taxonomic and occurrence data of a particular group. For – the responsible Group Coordinators are Thomas Pape (versions 1 & 2) and Paul Beuk (version 2). The Fauna Europaea checklist would not have reached its current level of completion without the input from several taxonomic specialists. The formal responsibility of collating and delivering the data for relevant families has resided with the appointed Taxonomic Specialists (see Table 1), while Associate Specialists deserve due credit for their important contributions at various levels, including particular geographic regions or (across) taxonomic groups (see Table 3). Data management tasks were taken care of by the Fauna Europaea project bureau. During the project phase (until 2004) a network of principal partners took care of the diverse management tasks: Zoological Museum Amsterdam (general management & system development), Zoological Museum of Copenhagen (data collation), National Museum of Natural History in Paris (data validation) and Museum and Institute of Zoology in Warsaw (Newly Associated States [NAS] extension). From the formal termination of the project in 2004 to 2013, all tasks were taken over by the Zoological Museum Amsterdam.

Study area description

The study area covers the western Palaearctic, including the European mainland, Great Britain, the Macaronesian islands, Cyprus, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya, but excluding Turkey, the Caucasus, western Kazakhstan, the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa (see Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Fauna Europaea geographic coverage ('minimal Europe').

Design description

. Group Coordinators and taxonomic specialists have been delivering the (sub)species names according to strict standards. The names provided by Fauna Europaea are scientific names. The taxonomic scope includes issues like, (1) the definition of criteria used to identify the accepted species-group taxa, (2) the hierarchy (classification scheme) for the accommodation of all accepted (sub)species, (3) relevant synonyms, and (4) the correct nomenclature. The Fauna Europaea 'Guidelines for Group Coordinators and Taxonomic Specialists' (Suppl. material 1) include the standards, protocols, scope and geographical limits and provide the instructions for the more than 400 taxonomic specialists contributing to the project. Data management. The data records could either be entered offline into a preformatted MS-Excel worksheet or directly into the Fauna Europaea transaction database using an online browser interface. Since 2013 the data servers are hosted at the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, and an updated data entry tool is under development. Data set. The Fauna Europaea basic data set consists of: accepted (sub)species names (including authorship), synonyms (including authorship), taxonomic hierarchy / classification, misapplied names (including misspellings and alternative taxonomic views), homonym annotations, expert details, European distribution (at the level of country or major island), global distribution (only for European species), taxonomic reference (optional), occurrence reference (optional).

Funding

Fauna Europae a was funded by the European Commission under the Fifth Framework Programme and contributed to the Support for Research Infrastructures work programme with Thematic Priority Biodiversity (EVR1-1999-20001) for a period of four years (1 March 2000 – 1 March 2004), including a short 'NAS extension', allowing EU candidate accession countries to participate. Follow-up support was given by the EC-FP5 EuroCAT project (EVR1-CT-2002-20011), by the EC-FP6 ENBI project (EVK2-CT-2002-20020), by the EC-FP6 EDIT project (GCE 018340), by the EC-FP7 PESI project (RI-223806) and by the EC-FP7 ViBRANT project (RI-261532). Continued management and hosting of the Fauna Europaea services was supported by the University of Amsterdam (Zoological Museum Amsterdam) and SARA/Vancis. Recently, the hosting of Fauna Europaea was taken over by the Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, supported by the EC-FP7 EU BON project (grant agreement №308454). Additional support for preparing the – data set was received through the numerous institutions allowing for the proper allocation of time by the taxonomic specialists.

Sampling methods

Study extent

See relevant sections on coverage.

Sampling description

Fauna Europaea data have been assembled by the principal taxonomic specialists based on their individual expertise, which includes studies of the literature, collection research, and field sampling. In total 476 taxonomic specialists contributed taxonomic and/or faunistic information for Fauna Europaea. The vast majority of the experts are from Europe (including EU non-member states). As a unique feature, Fauna Europaea funds were set aside for paying/compensating for the work of taxonomic specialists and Group Coordinators (around five Euro per species). To facilitate data transfer and data import, sophisticated on-line (web interfaces) and off-line (spreadsheets) data-entry routines were built, well integrated within an underlying central Fauna Europaea transaction database (see Fig. 1). This included advanced batch data import routines and utilities to display and monitor the data processing within the system. In retrospect, it seems that the off-line submission of data was probably the best for bulk import during the project phase, while the on-line tool was preferred to enter modifications in later versions. This data management system worked well until its replacement in 2013.
Figure 1.

Fauna Europaea on-line (browser interfaces) and off-line (spreadsheets) data entry tools.

A first release of Fauna Europaea via the web-portal was presented on 27 September 2004, whereas the most recent release (version 2.6.2) was launched on 29 August 2013. An overview of Fauna Europaea releases can be found at: http://www.faunaeur.org/about_fauna_versions.php.

Quality control

Fauna Europaea data are unique in the sense that they are fully expert-based. Selecting leading experts for all groups provided a principal assurance of the systematic reliability and consistency of the Fauna Europaea data. Further, all Fauna Europaea data sets have been intensively reviewed at regional and thematic validation meetings, at review sessions at taxonomic symposia (for some groups), by Fauna Europaea Focal Points (during the FaEu-NAS and PESI projects) and by various end-users sending annotations using the web form at the web-portal. Additional validation on gaps and correct spellings was effected by the validation office at the National Museum of Natural History in Paris. Checks on technical and logical correctness of the data were implemented by the data entry tools, including around 50 'Taxonomic Integrity Rules'. This validation tool proved to be of considerable value for both the taxonomic specialists and project management, and significantly contributed to the preparation of a remarkably clean and consistent data set. This thorough review procedure makes Fauna Europaea the most scrutinised data set in its domain. In general we expected to get taxonomic data for 99.3% of the known European fauna directly after the initial release of Fauna Europaea (de Jong et al. 2014). The faunistic coverage is not quite as good, but is nevertheless 90-95% of the total fauna. Currently, for the – the taxonomic completeness is considered to be around 93% (see Table 1). To optimise the use and implementation of a uniform and correct nomenclature, a cross-referencing of the Fauna Europaea data-set with relevant nomenclators, including Systema Dipterorum, is recommended, following the global efforts on establishing a so-called 'Global Names Architecture' (Pyle and Michel 2008).

Step description

By evaluating team structure and procedures (data-entry, validation, updating, etc.), clear definitions of roles of users and user-groups in relation to the taxonomic classification were established, including ownership and read/write privileges. In addition, guidelines on common data exchange formats and codes have been issued (see also Suppl. material 1).

Geographic coverage

Description

Species and subspecies distributions in Fauna Europaea are registered at least at the level of (political) country. For this purpose the FaEu geographical system basically follows the TDWG standards (see Fig. 2). The area studied covers the western Palaearctic, including the European mainland, Great Britain, the Macaronesian islands, Cyprus, Faroe Islands, Iceland, Svalbard, Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya, but excluding Turkey, the Caucasus, western Kazakhstan, the Arabian Peninsula and North Africa (see Fig. 3).
Figure 2.

Fauna Europaea TDWG areas.

The focus is on species (or subspecies) of European multicellular animals of land and freshwater environments. Species in brackish waters, occupying the marine/freshwater or marine/terrestrial transition zones, are generally excluded.

Coordinates

Mediterranean and Arctic Islands Latitude; Atlantic Ocean (Mid-Atlantic Ridge) and Ural Longitude.

Taxonomic coverage

The Fauna Europaea database contains the scientific names of all living European land and freshwater animal species, including numerous groups at various hierarchical levels, and the most important synonyms. More details about the conceptual background of Fauna Europaea and standards followed are described above. This data paper covers the – content of Fauna Europaea, including 96 families, 11,751 species, 179 subspecies and 2,233 (sub)specific synonyms (see Fig. 4). Higher ranks are given below, the species list can be downloaded from the Fauna Europaea portal (see: Data resources).
Figure 4.

Fauna Europaea – species per family. See Table 1 for family statistics. For full resolution see Suppl. material 2.

Some recent changes in the classification of – will be effectuated in the next version. This includes the merging of the families and into a single family, (the older family group name) (McAlpine 2007, Munari and Mathis 2010) and the splitting of the (s.lat.) into (s.str.) and in accordance with what is now current practice (Pape et al. 2011, Pape and Evenhuis 2013).

Temporal coverage

Living time period: Currently living multicellular, terrestrial and freshwater animals in stable populations, largely excluding (1) rare / irregular immigrants, (2) alien / invasive species, (3) accidental or deliberate releases of exotic (pet)species, (4) domesticated animals, (5) non-native species imported and released for bio-control or (6) non-native species largely confined to hothouses..

Usage rights

Use license

Open Data Commons Attribution License

IP rights notes

Fauna Europaea data are licensed under CC BY SA version 4.0. The property rights of experts over their data is covered under the SMEBD conditions. For more copyrights and citation details see: http://www.faunaeur.org/copyright.php.

Data resources

Data package title

Fauna Europaea - -

Resource link

http://www.faunaeur.org/Data_papers/FaEu_Diptera-Brachycera_2.6.2.zip

Alternative identifiers

http://www.faunaeur.org/experts.php?id=92

Number of data sets

2

Data set 1.

Data set name

Fauna Europaea - - version 2.6.2 - species

Data format

CSV

Number of columns

25

Character set

UTF-8

Download URL

http://www.faunaeur.org/Data_papers/FaEu_Diptera-Brachycera_2.6.2.zip

Data set 2.

Fauna Europaea - - version 2.6.2 - hierarchy CSV 12 UTF-8 http://www.faunaeur.org/Data_papers/FaEu_Diptera-Brachycera_2.6.2.zip

Additional information

In the very last phase of the - paper preparation, we received the sad news that one of our respected Fauna Europaea experts on and co-author of this paper, Vera Andreevna Richter, passed away at the age of 79 years. A short obituary can be found here: Suppl. material 3. Fauna Europaea Guidelines for Group Coordinators and Taxonomic Specialists Data type: pdf File: oo_3494.pdf FaEu - stats Data type: png Brief description: This is a high-resolution version of Figure 4. File: oo_32490.png Vera Andreevna Richter short obituary Data type: pdf File: oo_38602.pdf
RankScientific NameCommon Name
kingdom Animalia animals
subkingdom Eumetazoa
phylum Arthropoda arthropods
subphylum Hexapoda hexapods
class Insecta insects
order Diptera true flies
suborder Brachycera
family Acartophthalmidae
family Acroceridae
family Agromyzidae
family Anthomyiidae
family Anthomyzidae
family Asilidae
family Asteiidae
family Atelestidae
family Athericidae
family Aulacigastridae
family Bombyliidae
family Borboropsidae
family Braulidae
family Calliphoridae
family Camillidae
family Campichoetidae
family Canacidae
family Carnidae
family Chamaemyiidae
family Chiropteromyzidae
family Chloropidae
family Chyromyidae
family Clusiidae
family Cnemospathididae
family Coelopidae
family Coenomyidae
family Coenomyiidae
family Conopidae
family Cryptochetidae
family Curtonotidae
family Diastatidae
family Diopsidae
family Dolichopodidae
family Drosophilidae
family Dryomyzidae
family Empididae
family Ephydridae
family Fanniidae
family Gasterophilidae
family Helcomyzidae
family Heleomyzidae
family Heterocheilidae
family Hilarimorphidae
family Hippoboscidae
family Hybotidae
family Hypodermatidae
family Lauxaniidae
family Lonchaeidae
family Lonchopteridae
family Megamerinidae
family Micropezidae
family Microphoridae
family Milichiidae
family Muscidae
family Mydidae
family Mythicomyiidae
family Nannodastiidae
family Nemestrinidae
family Neottiophilidae
family Nycteribiidae
family Odiniidae
family Oestridae
family Opetiidae
family Opomyzidae
family Otitidae
family Pallopteridae
family Periscelididae
family Phaeomyiidae
family Phoridae
family Piophilidae
family Pipunculidae
family Platypezidae
family Platystomatidae
family Pseudopomyzidae
family Psilidae
family Pyrgotidae
family Rachiceridae
family Rhagionidae
family Rhinophoridae
family Sarcophagidae
family Scathophagidae
family Scenopinidae
family Sciomyzidae
family Sciomyzidae
family Sepsidae
family Solvidae
family Sphaeroceridae
family Stenomicridae
family Stratiomyidae
family Streblidae
family Strongylophthalmyiidae
family Syrphidae
family Tabanidae
family Tachinidae
family Tanypezidae
family Tephritidae
family Tethinidae
family Therevidae
family Thyreophoridae
family Trixoscelididae
family Ulidiidae
family Vermileonidae
family Xenasteiidae
family Xylomyidae
family Xylophagidae
subfamily Achanthipterinae
subfamily Agromyzinae
subfamily Anthomyzinae
subfamily Anthracinae
subfamily Antoniinae
subfamily Apocleinae
subfamily Asilinae
subfamily Azeliinae
subfamily Bombyliinae
subfamily Callomyiinae
subfamily Calobatinae
subfamily Canacinae
subfamily Chalarinae
subfamily Chamaemyiinae
subfamily Clusiinae
subfamily Clusiodinae
subfamily Coelopinae
subfamily Coenosiinae
subfamily Copromyzinae
subfamily Cremifaniinae
subfamily Cythereinae
subfamily Dacinae
subfamily Dasiopinae
subfamily Dasypogoninae
subfamily Dexiinae
subfamily Discomyzinae
subfamily Drosophilinae
subfamily Ecliminae
subfamily Ephydrinae
subfamily Exoristinae
subfamily Gasterophilinae
subfamily Gymnomyzinae
subfamily Heleomyzinae
subfamily Heteromyzinae
subfamily Hirmoneurinae
subfamily Hydrelliinae
subfamily Hypodermatinae
subfamily Ilytheinae
subfamily Laphriinae
subfamily Laphystiinae
subfamily Leptogastrinae
subfamily Leptomydinae
subfamily Limosininae
subfamily Lomatiinae
subfamily Lonchaeinae
subfamily Madizinae
subfamily Micropezinae
subfamily Microsaniinae
subfamily Milichiinae
subfamily Miltogramminae
subfamily Muscinae
subfamily Mydaeinae
subfamily Nemestrininae
subfamily Neottiophilinae
subfamily Nephrocerinae
subfamily Oestrinae
subfamily Oligodraninae
subfamily Orygmatinae
subfamily Otitinae
subfamily Paramacronychiinae
subfamily Periscelidinae
subfamily Phaoniinae
subfamily Phasiinae
subfamily Phthiriinae
subfamily Phycinae
subfamily Phytomyzinae
subfamily Piophilinae
subfamily Pipunculinae
subfamily Platypezinae
subfamily Platystomatinae
subfamily Sarcophaginae
subfamily Sepsinae
subfamily Sphaerocerinae
subfamily Steganinae
subfamily Stenomicrinae
subfamily Stenopogoninae
subfamily Stichopogoninae
subfamily Suilliinae
subfamily Syllegomydinae
subfamily Tachininae
subfamily Taeniapterinae
subfamily Tephritinae
subfamily Therevinae
subfamily Toxophorinae
subfamily Trichopsidiinae
subfamily Trypetinae
subfamily Ulidiinae
subfamily Usiinae
tribe Adramini
tribe Andrenosomini
tribe Anthracini
tribe Aphoebantini
tribe Apolysini
tribe Atherigonini
tribe Atissini
tribe Atomosiini
tribe Azeliini
tribe Bombyliini
tribe Borboropsini
tribe Canacini
tribe Carpomyini
tribe Cecidocharini
tribe Cephaliini
tribe Cephalopsini
tribe Ceratitidini
tribe Chamaemyiini
tribe Chiropteromyzini
tribe Coelopini
tribe Coenosiini
tribe Conophorini
tribe Cyrtopogonini
tribe Dacini
tribe Dagini
tribe Dasypogonini
tribe Dichaetomyiini
tribe Dioctriini
tribe Discocerinini
tribe Discomyzini
tribe Dithrycini
tribe Drosophilini
tribe Dryxini
tribe Dynomiellini
tribe Eginiini
tribe Ephydrini
tribe Euarestini
tribe Eudorylini
tribe Exoprosopini
tribe Gerontini
tribe Gitonini
tribe Glumini
tribe Gymnomyzini
tribe Hecamedini
tribe Heleomyzini
tribe Heteromyzini
tribe Hyadinini
tribe Hydrelliini
tribe Ilytheini
tribe Incertaesedistephritinini
tribe Isopogonini
tribe Laphriini
tribe Leucopini
tribe Limnophorini
tribe Lipochaetini
tribe Lipsanini
tribe Lomatiini
tribe Microcephalopsini
tribe Molobratiini
tribe Muscini
tribe Mycetaulini
tribe Myennidini
tribe Myopitini
tribe Nidomyiini
tribe Noeetini
tribe Notiphilini
tribe Ochtherini
tribe Oecotheini
tribe Orbelliini
tribe Otitini
tribe Parydrini
tribe Phaoniini
tribe Piophilini
tribe Pipunculini
tribe Plesiocerini
tribe Psilopini
tribe Reinwardtiini
tribe Scatellini
tribe Seiopterini
tribe Steganini
tribe Stenopogonini
tribe Stomoxyini
tribe Suilliini
tribe Tephrellini
tribe Tephritini
tribe Terelliini
tribe Tomosvaryellini
tribe Toxophorini
tribe Trixoscelidini
tribe Trypetini
tribe Typopsilopini
tribe Ulidiini
tribe Usiini
tribe Villini
tribe Xeramoebini
tribe Xyphosiini
tribe Zaceratini
subtribe Acletoxina
subtribe Carpomyina
subtribe Chetostomatina
subtribe Drosophilina
subtribe Gitonina
subtribe Leucophengina
subtribe Nitrariomyiina
subtribe Oedaspidina
subtribe Piophilina
subtribe Plioreoceptina
subtribe Steganina
subtribe Tephrellina
subtribe Thyreophorina
subtribe Trypetina
Data set 1.
Column labelColumn description
datasetNameThe name identifying the data set from which the record was derived (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/datasetName).
versionRelease version of data set.
versionIssuedIssue data of data set version.
rightsInformation about rights held in and over the resource (http://purl.org/dc/terms/rights).
rightsHolderA person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource (http://purl.org/dc/terms/rightsHolder).
accessRightsInformation about who can access the resource or an indication of its security status (http://purl.org/dc/terms/accessRights).
taxonIDAn identifier for the set of taxon information (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID)
parentNameUsageIDAn identifier for the name usage of the direct parent taxon (in a classification) of the most specific element of the scientificName (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/parentNameUsageID).
scientificNameThe full scientific name, with authorship and date information if known (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName).
acceptedNameUsageThe full name, with authorship and date information if known, of the currently valid (zoological) taxon (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/acceptedNameUsage).
originalNameUsageThe original combination (genus and species group names), as firstly established under the rules of the associated nomenclaturalCode (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/originalNameUsage).
familyThe full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/family).
familyNameIdAn identifier for the family name.
genusThe full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/genus).
subgenusThe full scientific name of the subgenus in which the taxon is classified. Values include the genus to avoid homonym confusion (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/subgenus).
specificEpithetThe name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/specificEpithet).
infraspecificEpithetThe name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank designation (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/infraspecificEpithet).
taxonRankThe taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/infraspecificEpithet).
scientificNameAuthorshipThe authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificNameAuthorship).
authorNameAuthor name information
namePublishedInYearThe four-digit year in which the scientificName was published (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/namePublishedInYear).
BracketsAnnotation if authorship should be put between parentheses.
nomenclaturalCodeThe nomenclatural code under which the scientificName is constructed (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/nomenclaturalCode).
taxonomicStatusThe status of the use of the scientificName as a label for a taxon (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonomicStatus).
resourceDescriptionAn account of the resource, including a data-paper DOI (http://purl.org/dc/terms/description)
Data set 2.
Column labelColumn description
datasetNameThe name identifying the data set from which the record was derived (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/datasetName).
versionRelease version of data set.
versionIssuedIssue data of data set version.
rightsInformation about rights held in and over the resource (http://purl.org/dc/terms/rights).
rightsHolderA person or organization owning or managing rights over the resource (http://purl.org/dc/terms/rightsHolder).
accessRightsInformation about who can access the resource or an indication of its security status (http://purl.org/dc/terms/accessRights).
taxonNameThe full scientific name of the higher-level taxon
scientificNameAuthorshipThe authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificNameAuthorship).
taxonRankThe taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/infraspecificEpithet).
taxonIDAn identifier for the set of taxon information (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID)
parentNameUsageIDAn identifier for the name usage of the direct parent taxon (in a classification) of the most specific element of the scientificName (http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/parentNameUsageID).
resourceDescriptionAn account of the resource, including a data-paper DOI (http://purl.org/dc/terms/description)
Table 2.

Changes in group coordinatorship and taxonomic specialists for –, which will take effect from Version 3.

FAMILY NAMEEXPERTS VERSIONS 1 & 2 (current)CommentEXPERTS VERSION 3 (future)Comment
Bombyliidae David J. Greathead DeceasedNeal L. Evenhuis
Mydidae David J. Greathead DeceasedTorsten Dikow
Mythicomyiidae David J. Greathead DeceasedNeal L. Evenhuis
Nemestrinidae David J. Greathead DeceasedTorsten Dikow
Nycteribiidae Karel Hůrka (Farkač 2005)DeceasedMihály Földvári
Streblidae Karel Hůrka (Farkač 2005)DeceasedMihály Földvári
Hippoboscidae Frederik T. PetersenResignedThomas Pape
Lonchaeidae Miguel Carles-TolráResignedIain MacGowan
Lauxaniidae Bernhard MerzResignedStephen D. Gaimari
Pallopteridae Bernhard MerzResignedMiguel Carles-Tolrá
Pseudopomyzidae Bernhard MerzResignedMiguel Carles-Tolrá
Pyrgotidae Bernhard MerzResignedValery A. Korneyev
Hilarimorphidae Thomas PapeResignedChristian Kehlmaier
Vermileonidae Thomas PapeResignedChristian Kehlmaier
Pipunculidae Marc de MeyerResignedChristian Kehlmaier
Clusiidae Jindřich Roháček & Bernhard MerzBM ResignedJindřich Roháček
Ulidiidae Elena P. Kameneva & Lita Greve-JensenLGJ ResignedElena P. Kameneva
Paul Beuk (version 2)ResignedThomas PapeGroup Coordinatorship
  11 in total

1.  Maggot therapy for treating diabetic foot ulcers unresponsive to conventional therapy.

Authors:  Ronald A Sherman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Forensic entomology in criminal investigations.

Authors:  E P Catts; M L Goff
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Congruence and controversy: toward a higher-level phylogeny of Diptera.

Authors:  D K Yeates; B M Wiegmann
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 19.686

4.  Maggot therapy for foot and leg wounds.

Authors:  Ronald A Sherman
Journal:  Int J Low Extrem Wounds       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.057

Review 5.  Bionomics of the face fly, Musca autumnalis.

Authors:  E S Krafsur; R D Moon
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (Addenda 2013).

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.091

7.  Nuisance flies around a landfill: patterns of abundance and distribution.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  Waste Manag Res       Date:  2001-08

8.  Episodic radiations in the fly tree of life.

Authors:  Brian M Wiegmann; Michelle D Trautwein; Isaac S Winkler; Norman B Barr; Jung-Wook Kim; Christine Lambkin; Matthew A Bertone; Brian K Cassel; Keith M Bayless; Alysha M Heimberg; Benjamin M Wheeler; Kevin J Peterson; Thomas Pape; Bradley J Sinclair; Jeffrey H Skevington; Vladimir Blagoderov; Jason Caravas; Sujatha Narayanan Kutty; Urs Schmidt-Ott; Gail E Kampmeier; F Christian Thompson; David A Grimaldi; Andrew T Beckenbach; Gregory W Courtney; Markus Friedrich; Rudolf Meier; David K Yeates
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Maggot versus conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Ronald A Sherman
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Fauna Europaea - all European animal species on the web.

Authors:  Yde de Jong; Melina Verbeek; Verner Michelsen; Per de Place Bjørn; Wouter Los; Fedor Steeman; Nicolas Bailly; Claire Basire; Przemek Chylarecki; Eduard Stloukal; Gregor Hagedorn; Florian Tobias Wetzel; Falko Glöckler; Alexander Kroupa; Günther Korb; Anke Hoffmann; Christoph Häuser; Andreas Kohlbecker; Andreas Müller; Anton Güntsch; Pavel Stoev; Lyubomir Penev
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2014-09-17
View more
  11 in total

1.  Annotated catalogue of the Tachinidae (Insecta, Diptera) of the Afrotropical Region, with the description of seven new genera.

Authors:  James E O'Hara; Pierfilippo Cerretti
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 1.546

2.  New records of Muscidae (Diptera) from Mediterranean countries.

Authors:  Marija Ivković; Adrian C Pont
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  New records of Sarcophagidae from Turkey (Diptera).

Authors:  Yury Verves; Miroslav Barták; Štěpán Kubík; Hasan Sungur Civelek
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 1.546

4.  Frit flies of Turkey with descriptions of two new species and new records (Diptera, Chloropidae).

Authors:  Štěpán Kubík; Miroslav Barták
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 1.546

5.  Checklist of flesh flies of Turkey (Diptera, Sarcophagidae).

Authors:  Yury Verves; Miroslav Barták; Štěpán Kubík
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 1.546

6.  Impact of urbanization on predator and parasitoid insects at multiple spatial scales.

Authors:  Daria Corcos; Pierfilippo Cerretti; Valerio Caruso; Maurizio Mei; Matteo Falco; Lorenzo Marini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Louse flies in Azorean and mainland populations of four Passeriformes species: A new perspective to parasite Island syndromes.

Authors:  André Tomás; Isabel Pereira da Fonseca; Thijs Valkenburg; Maria Teresa Rebelo
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.674

8.  History of tachinid classification (Diptera, Tachinidae).

Authors:  James E O'Hara
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  A new species of Neossos Malloch (Diptera: Heleomyzidae) from the Yukon Territory, Canada, and a revised key to the Nearctic species.

Authors:  Anna M Solecki; Terry A Wheeler
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2015-10-05

10.  Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs.

Authors:  Karsten Mody; Doris Lerch; Ann-Kathrin Müller; Nadja K Simons; Nico Blüthgen; Matthias Harnisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.