| Literature DB >> 25733869 |
Yan-Bo Sun1, Zi-Jun Xiong2, Xue-Yan Xiang3, Shi-Ping Liu4, Wei-Wei Zhou1, Xiao-Long Tu5, Li Zhong6, Lu Wang6, Dong-Dong Wu1, Bao-Lin Zhang7, Chun-Ling Zhu1, Min-Min Yang1, Hong-Man Chen1, Fang Li8, Long Zhou8, Shao-Hong Feng8, Chao Huang9, Guo-Jie Zhang10, David Irwin11, David M Hillis12, Robert W Murphy13, Huan-Ming Yang14, Jing Che15, Jun Wang16, Ya-Ping Zhang17.
Abstract
The development of efficient sequencing techniques has resulted in large numbers of genomes being available for evolutionary studies. However, only one genome is available for all amphibians, that of Xenopus tropicalis, which is distantly related from the majority of frogs. More than 96% of frogs belong to the Neobatrachia, and no genome exists for this group. This dearth of amphibian genomes greatly restricts genomic studies of amphibians and, more generally, our understanding of tetrapod genome evolution. To fill this gap, we provide the de novo genome of a Tibetan Plateau frog, Nanorana parkeri, and compare it to that of X. tropicalis and other vertebrates. This genome encodes more than 20,000 protein-coding genes, a number similar to that of Xenopus. Although the genome size of Nanorana is considerably larger than that of Xenopus (2.3 vs. 1.5 Gb), most of the difference is due to the respective number of transposable elements in the two genomes. The two frogs exhibit considerable conserved whole-genome synteny despite having diverged approximately 266 Ma, indicating a slow rate of DNA structural evolution in anurans. Multigenome synteny blocks further show that amphibians have fewer interchromosomal rearrangements than mammals but have a comparable rate of intrachromosomal rearrangements. Our analysis also identifies 11 Mb of anuran-specific highly conserved elements that will be useful for comparative genomic analyses of frogs. The Nanorana genome offers an improved understanding of evolution of tetrapod genomes and also provides a genomic reference for other evolutionary studies.Entities:
Keywords: chromosome rearrangement; de novo genome; highly conserved element; transposable elements
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25733869 PMCID: PMC4371989 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1501764112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205