Literature DB >> 12438785

Origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes.

D W Burt1.   

Abstract

The origin of avian microchromosomes has long been the subject of much speculation and debate. Microchromosomes are a universal characteristic of all avian species and many reptilian karyotypes. The typical avian karyotype contains about 40 pairs of chromosomes and usually 30 pairs of small to tiny microchromosomes. This characteristic karyotype probably evolved 100-250 million years ago. Once the microchromosomes were thought to be a non-essential component of the avian genome. Recent work has shown that even though these chromosomes represent only 25% of the genome; they encode 50% of the genes. Contrary to popular belief, microchromosomes are present in a wide range of vertebrate classes, spanning 400-450 million years of evolutionary history. In this paper, comparative gene mapping between the genomes of chicken, human, mouse and zebrafish, has been used to investigate the origin and evolution of avian microchromosomes during this period. This analysis reveals evidence for four ancient syntenies conserved in fish, birds and mammals for over 400 million years. More than half, if not all, microchromosomes may represent ancestral syntenies and at least ten avian microchromosomes are the product of chromosome fission. Birds have one of the smallest genomes of any terrestrial vertebrate. This is likely to be the product of an evolutionary process that minimizes the DNA content (mostly through the number of repeats) and maximizes the recombination rate of microchromosomes. Through this process the properties (GC content, DNA and repeat content, gene density and recombination rate) of microchromosomes and macrochromosomes have diverged to create distinct chromosome types. An ancestral genome for birds likely had a small genome, low in repeats and a karyotype with microchromosomes. A "Fission-Fusion Model" of microchromosome evolution based on chromosome rearrangement and minimization of repeat content is discussed. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12438785     DOI: 10.1159/000063018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  78 in total

1.  Comparison of the chicken and turkey genomes reveals a higher rate of nucleotide divergence on microchromosomes than macrochromosomes.

Authors:  Erik Axelsson; Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; David W Burt; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Phylogenetics of modern birds in the era of genomics.

Authors:  Scott V Edwards; W Bryan Jennings; Andrew M Shedlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates.

Authors:  Yoichiro Nakatani; Hiroyuki Takeda; Yuji Kohara; Shinichi Morishita
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Engineered plant minichromosomes: a resurrection of B chromosomes?

Authors:  Andreas Houben; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Core-SINE blocks comprise a large fraction of monotreme genomes; implications for vertebrate chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Patrick J Kirby; Ian K Greaves; Edda Koina; Paul D Waters; Jennifer A Marshall Graves
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Copy number variation, chromosome rearrangement, and their association with recombination during avian evolution.

Authors:  Martin Völker; Niclas Backström; Benjamin M Skinner; Elizabeth J Langley; Sydney K Bunzey; Hans Ellegren; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci with allelic transmission ratio distortion in F1 chicken population.

Authors:  Peng Ren; Feilong Deng; Shiyi Chen; Jinshan Ran; Jingjing Li; Lingqian Yin; Yan Wang; Huadong Yin; Qing Zhu; Yiping Liu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.291

8.  Avian comparative genomics: reciprocal chromosome painting between domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) and the stone curlew (Burhinus oedicnemus, Charadriiformes)--an atypical species with low diploid number.

Authors:  Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Bee L Ng; Beiyuan Fu; Vitaly Volobouev; Nigel P Carter; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Genomic organization and molecular phylogenies of the beta (beta) keratin multigene family in the chicken (Gallus gallus) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for feather evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J Greenwold; Roger H Sawyer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The value of avian genomics to the conservation of wildlife.

Authors:  Michael N Romanov; Elaina M Tuttle; Marlys L Houck; William S Modi; Leona G Chemnick; Marisa L Korody; Emily M Stremel Mork; Christie A Otten; Tanya Renner; Kenneth C Jones; Sugandha Dandekar; Jeanette C Papp; Yang Da; Eric D Green; Vincent Magrini; Matthew T Hickenbotham; Jarret Glasscock; Sean McGrath; Elaine R Mardis; Oliver A Ryder
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.