Literature DB >> 25733653

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis fails to prevent common infections in hospitalized children: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Iva Hojsak1, Višnja Tokić Pivac1, Ana Močić Pavić1, Agneza Marija Pasini1, Sanja Kolaček1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of nosocomial infections in children in developed countries is still high, ranging from 8% to 30%, and standard preventive measures, such as increased hygiene, are not sufficiently efficacious. One of the potential strategies for their prevention is the use of probiotics.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the role of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis in preventing nosocomial infections in the acute hospital setting.
DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 727 hospitalized children (aged 1-18 y). The children were randomly allocated to receive placebo (placebo group, n = 365) or B. animalis subsp. lactis at a dose of 10(9) colony-forming units/d (intervention group, n = 362) once daily for the entire duration of the hospital stay. Nosocomial infections were defined as infections that occurred >48 h after hospital admission and that were not present or incubating at the time of admission.
RESULTS: Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. There was no difference in the study primary outcome or incidence of common nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections between groups (22 vs. 29 infections, respectively; incidence rate ratio = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.41, 1.36; P = 0.32). No difference was found for the duration of common nosocomial infections [mean (range): 3.58 (1-7) vs. 3.79 (1-8) d, in placebo vs. intervention group; P = 0.74]. There was also no difference between the intervention and placebo groups for any of the other secondary outcomes (incidence of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections separately, duration of gastrointestinal and respiratory infections, and duration of hospitalization) and exploratory outcomes (gastrointestinal and respiratory symptoms, severity of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections, and the use of antibiotics).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the use of B. animalis subsp. lactis failed to prevent nosocomial infections in an acute-setting pediatric hospital in children who were >1 y of age. However, it should be taken into account that the overall incidence of nosocomial infections was lower than expected. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01702766.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis; children; nosocomial infection; prevention; probiotics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733653     DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.114.102004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  11 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics in the next-generation sequencing era.

Authors:  Jotham Suez; Niv Zmora; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 2.  Probiotics for preventing acute upper respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Yunli Zhao; Bi Rong Dong; Qiukui Hao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-24

3.  Probiotics for preventing acute otitis media in children.

Authors:  Anna M Scott; Justin Clark; Blair Julien; Farhana Islam; Kristian Roos; Keith Grimwood; Paul Little; Chris B Del Mar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-18

Review 4.  Probiotics for prevention and treatment of respiratory tract infections in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yizhong Wang; Xiaolu Li; Ting Ge; Yongmei Xiao; Yang Liao; Yun Cui; Yucai Zhang; Wenzhe Ho; Guangjun Yu; Ting Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Immune-Mediated Mechanisms of Action of Probiotics and Synbiotics in Treating Pediatric Intestinal Diseases.

Authors:  Julio Plaza-Díaz; Francisco Javier Ruiz-Ojeda; Mercedes Gil-Campos; Angel Gil
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 6.  Guidance on the use of probiotics in clinical practice in children with selected clinical conditions and in specific vulnerable groups.

Authors:  Iva Hojsak; Valentina Fabiano; Tudor Lucian Pop; Olivier Goulet; Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti; Fugen Cullu Çokuğraş; Massimo Pettoello-Mantovani; Sanja Kolaček
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 7.  Making Sense of … the Microbiome in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen; Caitlin S M Cowan; Marcus J Claesson; Timothy G Dinan; John F Cryan
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Systematic Network and Meta-analysis on the Antiviral Mechanisms of Probiotics: A Preventive and Treatment Strategy to Mitigate SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

Authors:  Sinjini Patra; Shivam Saxena; Nilanjan Sahu; Biswaranjan Pradhan; Anasuya Roychowdhury
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Should pediatric infectious diseases physicians be proponents of probiotics?

Authors:  Joan L Robinson
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 10.  Probiotics in Children: What Is the Evidence?

Authors:  Iva Hojsak
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2017-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.