Allison J Milner1, Greg Carter1, Jane Pirkis1, Jo Robinson1, Matthew J Spittal1. 1. Allison J. Milner, BPsych (Hons), MEpi, PhD, McCaughey VicHealth Centre for Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Greg Carter, MBBS, FRANZCP, Cert Child Psych, PhD, Centre for Translational Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan; Jane Pirkis, BA (Hons), MPsych, MAppEpid, PhD, Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Jo Robinson, BSc (Hons) Master Psych, Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Matthew J. Spittal, BSc (Hons), MBio, PhD, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in brief contact interventions for self-harm and suicide attempt. AIMS: To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide. METHOD: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted of randomised controlled trials using brief contact interventions (telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts). Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine study quality and subgroup effects. RESULTS: We found 14 eligible studies overall, of which 12 were amenable to meta-analyses. For any subsequent episode of self-harm or suicide attempt, there was a non-significant reduction in the overall pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.04, P = 0119) for intervention compared with control. The number of repetitions per person was significantly reduced in intervention v. control (incidence rate ratio IRR = 066, 95% CI 0.54-0.80, P<0001). There was no significant reduction in the odds of suicide in intervention compared with control (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: A non-significant positive effect on repeated self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide and a significant effect on the number of episodes of repeated self-harm or suicide attempts per person (based on only three studies) means that brief contact interventions cannot yet be recommended for widespread clinical implementation. We recommend further assessment of possible benefits in well-designed trials in clinical populations. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in brief contact interventions for self-harm and suicide attempt. AIMS: To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide. METHOD: A systematic review and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted of randomised controlled trials using brief contact interventions (telephone contacts; emergency or crisis cards; and postcard or letter contacts). Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine study quality and subgroup effects. RESULTS: We found 14 eligible studies overall, of which 12 were amenable to meta-analyses. For any subsequent episode of self-harm or suicide attempt, there was a non-significant reduction in the overall pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.74-1.04, P = 0119) for intervention compared with control. The number of repetitions per person was significantly reduced in intervention v. control (incidence rate ratio IRR = 066, 95% CI 0.54-0.80, P<0001). There was no significant reduction in the odds of suicide in intervention compared with control (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.24-1.38). CONCLUSIONS: A non-significant positive effect on repeated self-harm, suicide attempt and suicide and a significant effect on the number of episodes of repeated self-harm or suicide attempts per person (based on only three studies) means that brief contact interventions cannot yet be recommended for widespread clinical implementation. We recommend further assessment of possible benefits in well-designed trials in clinical populations. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
Authors: Austin B Frakt; Julia C Prentice; Steven D Pizer; A Rani Elwy; Melissa M Garrido; Amy M Kilbourne; David Atkins Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-03 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Ivan W Miller; Carlos A Camargo; Sarah A Arias; Ashley F Sullivan; Michael H Allen; Amy B Goldstein; Anne P Manton; Janice A Espinola; Richard Jones; Kohei Hasegawa; Edwin D Boudreaux Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Eric Zhou; Christopher R DeCou; Jennifer Stuber; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Kosuke Kume; Frederick P Rivara Journal: Arch Suicide Res Date: 2019-07-18
Authors: Emily E Haroz; Christopher Kitchen; Paul S Nestadt; Holly C Wilcox; Jordan E DeVylder; Hadi Kharrazi Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Natalie B Riblet; Brian Shiner; Paula Schnurr; Martha L Bruce; Danuta Wasserman; Sarah Cornelius; Robert Scott; Bradley V Watts Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Katrina G Witt; Sarah E Hetrick; Gowri Rajaram; Philip Hazell; Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury; Ellen Townsend; Keith Hawton Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-04-22