Stephanie K Doupnik1,2,3, Brittany Rudd4,5, Timothy Schmutte6, Diana Worsley1, Cadence F Bowden1, Erin McCarthy1, Elliott Eggan1,7, Jeffrey A Bridge8, Steven C Marcus3,4. 1. PolicyLab, Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 4. Center for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 5. now with Institute for Juvenile Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 7. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 8. Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Abstract
Importance: To prevent suicide deaths, acute care settings need tools to ensure individuals at risk of suicide access mental health care and remain safe until they do so. Objective: To examine the association of brief acute care suicide prevention interventions with patients' subsequent suicide attempts, linkage to follow-up care, and depression symptoms at follow-up. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, and references of included studies using concepts of suicide, prevention, and clinical trial to identify relevant articles published January 2000 to May 2019. Study Selection: Studies describing clinical trials of single-encounter suicide prevention interventions were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed all articles to determine eligibility for study inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently abstracted data according to PRISMA guidelines and assessed studies' risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were pooled for each outcome using random-effects models. Small study effects including publication bias were assessed using Peter and Egger regression tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three primary outcomes were examined: subsequent suicide attempts, linkage to follow-up care, and depression symptoms at follow-up. Suicide attempts and linkage to follow-up care were measured using validated patient self-report measures and medical record review; odds ratios and Hedges g standardized mean differences were pooled to estimate effect sizes. Depression symptoms were measured 2 to 3 months after the encounter using validated self-report measures, and pooled Hedges g standardized mean differences were used to estimate effect sizes. Results: A total of 14 studies, representing outcomes for 4270 patients, were included. Pooled-effect estimates showed that brief suicide prevention interventions were associated with reduced subsequent suicide attempts (pooled odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89), increased linkage to follow-up (pooled odds ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.79-5.17) but were not associated with reduced depression symptoms (Hedges g = 0.28 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.59). Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, breif suicide prevention interventions were associated with reduced subsequent suicide attempts. Suicide prevention interventions delivered in a single in-person encounter may be effective at reducing subsequent suicide attempts and ensuring that patients engage in follow-up mental health care.
Importance: To prevent suicide deaths, acute care settings need tools to ensure individuals at risk of suicide access mental health care and remain safe until they do so. Objective: To examine the association of brief acute care suicide prevention interventions with patients' subsequent suicide attempts, linkage to follow-up care, and depression symptoms at follow-up. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, and references of included studies using concepts of suicide, prevention, and clinical trial to identify relevant articles published January 2000 to May 2019. Study Selection: Studies describing clinical trials of single-encounter suicide prevention interventions were included. Two reviewers independently reviewed all articles to determine eligibility for study inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently abstracted data according to PRISMA guidelines and assessed studies' risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data were pooled for each outcome using random-effects models. Small study effects including publication bias were assessed using Peter and Egger regression tests. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three primary outcomes were examined: subsequent suicide attempts, linkage to follow-up care, and depression symptoms at follow-up. Suicide attempts and linkage to follow-up care were measured using validated patient self-report measures and medical record review; odds ratios and Hedges g standardized mean differences were pooled to estimate effect sizes. Depression symptoms were measured 2 to 3 months after the encounter using validated self-report measures, and pooled Hedges g standardized mean differences were used to estimate effect sizes. Results: A total of 14 studies, representing outcomes for 4270 patients, were included. Pooled-effect estimates showed that brief suicide prevention interventions were associated with reduced subsequent suicide attempts (pooled odds ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89), increased linkage to follow-up (pooled odds ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.79-5.17) but were not associated with reduced depression symptoms (Hedges g = 0.28 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.59). Conclusions and Relevance: In this meta-analysis, breif suicide prevention interventions were associated with reduced subsequent suicide attempts. Suicide prevention interventions delivered in a single in-person encounter may be effective at reducing subsequent suicide attempts and ensuring that patients engage in follow-up mental health care.
Authors: Brian K Ahmedani; Christine Stewart; Gregory E Simon; Frances Lynch; Christine Y Lu; Beth E Waitzfelder; Leif I Solberg; Ashli A Owen-Smith; Arne Beck; Laurel A Copeland; Enid M Hunkeler; Rebecca C Rossom; Keoki Williams Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Joan Rosenbaum Asarnow; Larry J Baraff; Michele Berk; Charles S Grob; Mona Devich-Navarro; Robert Suddath; John C Piacentini; Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus; Daniel Cohen; Lingqi Tang Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Sarah A Ting; Ashley F Sullivan; Edwin D Boudreaux; Ivan Miller; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Stephen S O'Connor; Michael M Mcclay; Shujah Choudhry; Angela D Shields; Richard Carlson; Yaima Alonso; Kyle Lavin; Lisa Venanzi; Katherine Anne Comtois; Jo Ellen Wilson; Stephen E Nicolson Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Barbara Stanley; Gregory K Brown; Lisa A Brenner; Hanga C Galfalvy; Glenn W Currier; Kerry L Knox; Sadia R Chaudhury; Ashley L Bush; Kelly L Green Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Emily E Haroz; Christopher Kitchen; Paul S Nestadt; Holly C Wilcox; Jordan E DeVylder; Hadi Kharrazi Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Tammy Jiang; Dávid Nagy; Anthony J Rosellini; Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó; Katherine M Keyes; Timothy L Lash; Sandro Galea; Henrik T Sørensen; Jaimie L Gradus Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Petri Arvilommi; Jukka Valkonen; Lars H Lindholm; Selma Gaily-Luoma; Kirsi Suominen; Outi M Ruishalme; Marena Kukkonen; Harri Sihvola; Erkki Isometsä Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 25.617
Authors: Marcos Vinicius de Carvalho Mendes; Solange Laurentino Dos Santos; Claudia Cristina Lima de Castro; Betise Mery Alencar Sousa Macau Furtado; Heitor Victor Veiga da Costa; Albanita Gomes da Costa de Ceballos; Pauliana Valéria Machado Galvão; Cristine Vieira do Bonfim Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.390