Literature DB >> 25732753

Totally intracorporeal delta-shaped B-I anastomosis following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using the Tri-Staple™ reloads on the manual Ultra handle: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.

Mariko Man-I1, Koichi Suda2, Kenji Kikuchi3, Tsuyoshi Tanaka3, Shimpei Furuta3, Masaya Nakauchi3, Ken Ishikawa3, Yoshinori Ishida3, Ichiro Uyama3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy could be performed easily and sufficiently using only laparoscopic linear staplers. However, the restricted maneuverability and severe blurring of these staplers along with their limited hemostability induced strain. In this study, we determined the feasibility and safety of performing delta-shaped anastomosis using the Endo GIA™ Reloads with Tri-Staple™ Technology combined with Endo GIA™ Ultra Universal stapler (Tri-Staple) with a particular focus on short-term surgical outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a single-institutional prospective interventional study (UMIN 000008014). The Tri-Staple was prospectively used on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a curative totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy with delta-shaped anastomosis. These patients were matched with the 19 patients previously treated using the ENDOPATH(®) ETS Articulating Linear Cutters (ETS) on clinical and demographic characteristics.
RESULTS: There were no differences between the groups in anastomosis-related local complications, morbidity, non-anastomosis-related local complications, total systemic complications, and short-term outcomes with the exception of significantly reduced blood loss in the Tri-Staple group (ETS vs. Tri-Staple: 37 [10-306] vs. 15 [5-210] mL, p = 0.02). Intraoperative bleeding from the staple line was significantly reduced in the Tri-Staple group. The postoperative drain indwelling period (ETS vs. Tri-Staple, 6 [4-10] vs. 4 [2-43] days, p = 0.032), fasting period (5 [3-7] vs. 3 [3-24] days, p = 0.022), and hospital stay (14 [10-47] vs. 11 [6-58] days, p = 0.025) were significantly shorter in the Tri-Staple group. There was no mortality in this series. Acceleration assessed as indices of blurring of stapler tip might have a significant adverse influence on staple-line bleeding at stapling sites.
CONCLUSION: Totally laparoscopic Billroth I distal gastrectomy using Tri-Staple was feasible and safe with favorable short-term surgical outcomes. Reduced blurring while stapling may be a novel endpoint which newly developed stapling devices should target.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Delta-shaped anastomosis; Endo GIA Tri-Staple; Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy; Staple-line bleeding; Stomach neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732753     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4085-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report.

Authors:  Seigo Kitano; Norio Shiraishi; Kyuzo Fujii; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Masafumi Inomata; Yosuke Adachi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Seiji Satoh; Seiichiro Kanaya; Yoshinori Ishida; Keizo Taniguchi; Jun Isogaki; Kazuki Inaba; Katsuhiko Yanaga; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  M M Oken; R H Creech; D C Tormey; J Horton; T E Davis; E T McFadden; P P Carbone
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Totally laparoscopic gastric resection with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eduardo A Guzman; Alessio Pigazzi; Byrne Lee; Perry A Soriano; Rebecca A Nelson; I Benjamin Paz; Vijay Trisal; Joseph Kim; Joshua D I Ellenhorn
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Totally laparoscopic total and subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymph node dissection for early and advanced gastric cancer: early and long-term results of a 100-patient series.

Authors:  Cristiano G S Huscher; Andrea Mingoli; Giovanna Sgarzini; Gioia Brachini; Barbara Binda; Massimiliano Di Paola; Cecilia Ponzano
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Ikeda; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Yoshiro Aoki; Norifumi Harimoto; Jyunya Taomoto; Takaaki Masuda; Takefumi Ohga; Eisuke Adachi; Yasushi Toh; Takeshi Okamura; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia.

Authors:  M A Warner; S E Shields; C G Chute
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Seiji Satoh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.720

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effectiveness of laparoscopic stomach-partitioning gastrojejunostomy for patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Koichi Suda; Seiji Satoh; Yuichiro Kawamura; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer: Our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Kazuki Inaba; Yoshinori Ishida; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Laparoscopic gastrectomy using intracorporeally hand-sewn anastomosis of esophagojejunostomy, gastroduodenostomy, or gastrojejunostomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Fei Yan; Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Hendi Maher; He-Pan Zhu; Song-Mei Lou; Yong Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Practicality and short-term outcomes of intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Mingjie Xia; Xinyuan Guo; Quan Wang
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Establishment of a new practical telesurgical platform using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Masaya Nakauchi; Koichi Suda; Kenichi Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Susumu Shibasaki; Kazuki Inaba; Tatsuhiko Harada; Masanao Ohashi; Masayuki Ohigashi; Hiroaki Kitatsuji; Shingo Akimoto; Kenji Kikuchi; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopy-assisted Billroth-I anastomosis for gastric cancer: a case-control and case-matched study.

Authors:  Mi Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Ru-Hong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.