Literature DB >> 25732593

Cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy as a clinical service.

Howard Cuckle1, Peter Benn2, Eugene Pergament3.   

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) through the analysis of cell free (cf)DNA is revolutionizing prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Current methods used in clinical practice include shotgun massively parallel sequencing (s-MPS); targeted (t-MPS); and an approach that takes advantage of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences between mother and fetus. Efficacy of cfDNA testing for the common autosomal trisomies far exceeds that of conventional screening. Depending on the methodology used, reasons for discordancy between cfDNA results and fetal karyotype can include true fetal mosaicism, confined placental mosaicism, presence of a maternal karyotype abnormality, insufficient counting due to low fetal fraction, and a vanishing twin. Among the possible cfDNA strategies a Primary test has the highest performance but is expensive, while a Contingent cfDNA test can achieve high performance at a relatively low cost. Practicalities to be considered in the provision of testing include pretest counseling about the scope and accuracy of the testing, the interpretation of results when there is a low fetal fraction and follow-up studies for positive test results. The role of first trimester nuchal translucency measurement and conventional biochemical testing needs to be reassessed in the context of the use of cfDNA.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discordant; Fetal fraction; Non-invasive prenatal testing; Practicality; Screening strategy; cfDNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732593     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  19 in total

Review 1.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

2.  How Primary Care Providers Talk to Patients about Genome Sequencing Results: Risk, Rationale, and Recommendation.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; J Kelly Davis; Christine Kirby; Ian J Richardson; Robert C Green; Amy L McGuire; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Kurt D Christensen; Erica F Schonman; Carrie L Blout; Jill O Robinson; Joel B Krier; Pamela M Diamond; Matthew Lebo; Kalotina Machini; Danielle R Azzariti; Dmitry Dukhovny; David W Bates; Calum A MacRae; Michael F Murray; Heidi L Rehm; Amy L McGuire; Robert C Green
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic value and immune implications of the TTK gene in lung adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Bo Li; Xiaojuan Gu; Hanbing Zhang; Hao Xiong
Journal:  Anim Cells Syst (Seoul)       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.398

Review 5.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Sylvie Langlois; Vardit Ravitsky; François Audibert; David Gradus van den Berg; Hazar Haidar; François Rousseau
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2016-02-04

6.  Aneuploidy screening using circulating fetal cells in maternal blood by dual-probe FISH protocol: a prospective feasibility study on a series of 172 pregnant women.

Authors:  Giuseppe Calabrese; Donatella Fantasia; Melissa Alfonsi; Elisena Morizio; Claudio Celentano; Paolo Guanciali Franchi; Giulia Sabbatinelli; Chiara Palka; Peter Benn; Gianmaria Sitar
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.183

7.  Genomic newborn screening: public health policy considerations and recommendations.

Authors:  Jan M Friedman; Martina C Cornel; Aaron J Goldenberg; Karla J Lister; Karine Sénécal; Danya F Vears
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down's syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units.

Authors:  Lyn S Chitty; David Wright; Melissa Hill; Talitha I Verhoef; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Sarah Mason; Fiona McKay; Lucy Jenkins; Abigail Howarth; Louise Cameron; Alec McEwan; Jane Fisher; Mark Kroese; Stephen Morris
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-07-04

9.  Sequential combined test, second trimester maternal serum markers, and circulating fetal cells to select women for invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Paolo Guanciali Franchi; Chiara Palka; Elisena Morizio; Giulia Sabbatinelli; Melissa Alfonsi; Donatella Fantasia; Giammaria Sitar; Peter Benn; Giuseppe Calabrese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Imaging single DNA molecules for high precision NIPT.

Authors:  Fredrik Dahl; Olle Ericsson; Olof Karlberg; Filip Karlsson; Mathias Howell; Fredrik Persson; Fredrik Roos; Johan Stenberg; Tarja Ahola; Ida Alftrén; Björn Andersson; Emelie Barkenäs; Birgit Brandner; Jenny Dahlberg; Sara Elfman; Magnus Eriksson; Per-Ola Forsgren; Niels Francois; Anna Gousseva; Faizan Hakamali; Åsa Janfalk-Carlsson; Henrik Johansson; Johanna Lundgren; Atefeh Mohsenchian; Linus Olausson; Simon Olofsson; Atif Qureshi; Björn Skarpås; Anna Sävneby; Eva Åström; Ove Öhman; Magnus Westgren; Helena Kopp-Kallner; Aino Fianu-Jonasson; Argyro Syngelaki; Kypros Nicolaides
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.