Grahame K Simpson1, Luci Dall'Armi, Jessica K Roydhouse, Dion Forstner, Maysaa Daher, Teresa Simpson, Kathryn J White. 1. Author Affiliations: Liverpool Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, Liverpool Hospital (A/Prof Simpson); Brain Injury Rehabilitation Research Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research (A/Prof Simpson and Ms Daher); John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney (A/Prof Simpson); Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital (Dr Forstner, Mss Dall'Armi and Simpson); Cancer Nursing Research Unit, Sydney Nursing School, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of Sydney (Ms Roydhouse and Prof White); Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool Hospital (Dr Forstner), Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Caring for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) can have significant negative psychological and practical impact; however, some carers seem able to cope effectively. Little research has investigated this resilience among carers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the resilience levels among carers of patients with HNC. METHODS: Carers (n = 51) from 2 cancer services in New South Wales completed the Resilience Scale (RS), the Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale cutoff scores (>8) were used to classify carers with clinically significant levels of anxiety or depression. RESULTS: The majority of carers (67% [34/51]) reported moderately high to high resilience. Rates of anxiety and depression among carers were 27.4% and 9.8%, respectively. Higher resilience scores were significantly correlated with lower anxiety and depression scores, as well as increasing age. Resilience Scale scores were independent of the severity of the HNC. There were no significant correlations between RS scores and Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire scores. Finally, increasing RS scores were associated with a decreasing probability of possible anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that higher resilience in carers of HNC patients was associated with lower levels of psychological distress. Further investigation into the relationship between resilience and carer psychological wellbeing is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: If further evidence supports the findings of this study, then investigating ways to build resilience will be an important clinical option for reducing carer morbidity associated with anxiety and depression. The RS could be used to assess resilience levels among carers of HNC patients.
BACKGROUND: Caring for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) can have significant negative psychological and practical impact; however, some carers seem able to cope effectively. Little research has investigated this resilience among carers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the resilience levels among carers of patients with HNC. METHODS: Carers (n = 51) from 2 cancer services in New South Wales completed the Resilience Scale (RS), the Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale cutoff scores (>8) were used to classify carers with clinically significant levels of anxiety or depression. RESULTS: The majority of carers (67% [34/51]) reported moderately high to high resilience. Rates of anxiety and depression among carers were 27.4% and 9.8%, respectively. Higher resilience scores were significantly correlated with lower anxiety and depression scores, as well as increasing age. Resilience Scale scores were independent of the severity of the HNC. There were no significant correlations between RS scores and Head and Neck Information Needs Questionnaire scores. Finally, increasing RS scores were associated with a decreasing probability of possible anxiety or depression. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that higher resilience in carers of HNC patients was associated with lower levels of psychological distress. Further investigation into the relationship between resilience and carer psychological wellbeing is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: If further evidence supports the findings of this study, then investigating ways to build resilience will be an important clinical option for reducing carer morbidity associated with anxiety and depression. The RS could be used to assess resilience levels among carers of HNC patients.
Authors: G K B Halkett; E A Lobb; T Shaw; M M Sinclair; L Miller; E Hovey; A K Nowak Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Leah L Zullig; Heather E Whitson; Susan N Hastings; Chris Beadles; Julia Kravchenko; Igor Akushevich; Matthew L Maciejewski Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Eline W M Scholten; Julia D H P Simon; Tijn van Diemen; Chantal F Hillebregt; Marjolijn Ketelaar; Kees Hein Woldendorp; Rutger Osterthun; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Marcel W M Post Journal: BMC Psychol Date: 2020-05-20