Amine Boudil1, Irina R Matei2, Han-Yu Shih3, Goce Bogdanoski2, Julie S Yuan2, Stephen G Chang2, Bertrand Montpellier1, Paul E Kowalski2, Veronique Voisin4, Shaheena Bashir4, Gary D Bader5, Michael S Krangel3, Cynthia J Guidos1. 1. 1] Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. [2] Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 2. Program in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Canada. 3. Department of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. 1] The Donnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. [2] Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Signaling via the pre-T cell antigen receptor (pre-TCR) and the receptor Notch1 induces transient self-renewal (β-selection) of TCRβ(+) CD4(-)CD8(-) double-negative stage 3 (DN3) and DN4 progenitor cells that differentiate into CD4(+)CD8(+) double-positive (DP) thymocytes, which then rearrange the locus encoding the TCR α-chain (Tcra). Interleukin 7 (IL-7) promotes the survival of TCRβ(-) DN thymocytes by inducing expression of the pro-survival molecule Bcl-2, but the functions of IL-7 during β-selection have remained unclear. Here we found that IL-7 signaled TCRβ(+) DN3 and DN4 thymocytes to upregulate genes encoding molecules involved in cell growth and repressed the gene encoding the transcriptional repressor Bcl-6. Accordingly, IL-7-deficient DN4 cells lacked trophic receptors and did not proliferate but rearranged Tcra prematurely and differentiated rapidly. Deletion of Bcl6 partially restored the self-renewal of DN4 cells in the absence of IL-7, but overexpression of BCL2 did not. Thus, IL-7 critically acts cooperatively with signaling via the pre-TCR and Notch1 to coordinate proliferation, differentiation and Tcra recombination during β-selection.
Signaling via the pre-T cell antigen receptor (pre-TCR) and the receptor Notch1 induces transient self-renewal (β-selection) of TCRβ(+) CD4(-)CD8(-) double-negative stage 3 (DN3) and DN4 progenitor cells that differentiate into CD4(+)CD8(+) double-positive (DP) thymocytes, which then rearrange the locus encoding the TCR α-chain (Tcra). Interleukin 7 (IL-7) promotes the survival of TCRβ(-) DN thymocytes by inducing expression of the pro-survival molecule Bcl-2, but the functions of IL-7 during β-selection have remained unclear. Here we found that IL-7 signaled TCRβ(+) DN3 and DN4 thymocytes to upregulate genes encoding molecules involved in cell growth and repressed the gene encoding the transcriptional repressor Bcl-6. Accordingly, IL-7-deficient DN4 cells lacked trophic receptors and did not proliferate but rearranged Tcra prematurely and differentiated rapidly. Deletion of Bcl6 partially restored the self-renewal of DN4 cells in the absence of IL-7, but overexpression of BCL2 did not. Thus, IL-7 critically acts cooperatively with signaling via the pre-TCR and Notch1 to coordinate proliferation, differentiation and Tcra recombination during β-selection.
During intrathymic T cell development, Notch1 signaling maintains survival and
promotes T lineage commitment as CD44+ CD25− DN1 cells
differentiate into CD44+ CD25+ DN2 and CD44lo
CD25+ DN3a cells[1]. Mice
lacking the interleukin-7 (Il7) or Il7
receptor (Il7r) genes have very few DN2 and DN3 cells, in part
because they depend on IL-7 signaling to induce expression of Bcl2, a
pro-survival gene[2]. Indeed, transgenic
expression of humanBCL2 (BCL2)[3, 4] or deletion of
Bax or Bim pro-apoptotic genes[5, 6] significantly restores
both DN2-DN3 and mature single positive (SP) compartments in
Il7r−/− or
γc−/− mice. Thus, IL-7 induces
Bcl2-mediated survival of T-lineage committed DN2-DN3a progenitors as they become quiescent
and rearrange T cell receptor (Tcr) gamma, delta and
beta (Tcrg, Tcrd and Tcrb) gene
segments. Subsequent proliferation and differentiation of αβ T cell
progenitors requires successful Tcrb rearrangement and expression of
intracellular TCRβ (icTCRβ) protein to form the pre-TCR signaling complex
and initiate “β-selection”. Although IL7R expression persists
through the early stages of β-selection, the importance of IL-7 signaling in this
process has not been resolved.pre-TCR and Notch1 signaling co-operate to initiate β-selection[7] by inducing quiescent DN3a cells to
down-regulate expression of Recombination activating genes
(Rag) and become large cycling DN3b cells that up-regulate transferrin
receptor (Tfrc or CD71) and other trophic receptors[8]. These pre-TCR and Notch1-induced changes promote rapid self-renewal of
DN3b cells as they lose CD25 and differentiate sequentially into cycling DN4, CD8 immature
single positive (ISP) and early DP (eDP) blast cells, which then cease proliferating and
become quiescent late DP (lDP) cells. However, it is unclear whether pre-TCR and Notch1
signaling are sufficient to maintain trophic responses, proliferation and differentiation
during β-selection in vivo.Rag expression declines precipitously after the DN3a stage, so
efficient Tcra rearrangement requires Rag re-expression in
DP thymocytes[9]. Tcra
recombination normally initiates in eDP cells using the most 3’ Vα and
5’ Jα gene segments. If DP thymocytes fail to be positively selected after
primary Tcra rearrangement, secondary rearrangements that use progressively
more distal 5’ Vα and 3’ Jα gene segments occur, but only in
non-cycling lDP cells[10]. The
Tcra-Eα enhancer, located 3’ of the
Jα array, modifies Tcra locus chromatin to make
3’ Vα segments and 5’Jα gene segments accessible to Rag,
facilitating their synapsis and recombination[11]. Although Tcra rearrangement is restricted to DP
thymocytes, Eα may be activated as early as the DN4 stage by transcription factors
induced by pre-TCR signaling[12]. During the
pre-B cell receptor (pre-BCR) induced pro-B to pre-B transition, IL-7 induces proliferation
and represses Ig kappa rearrangement by a STAT5-dependent epigenetic
mechanism[13, 14]. STAT5 also represses Bcl6 expression to prevent
p53-induced apoptosis during Ig light chain recombination in pre-B
cells[15, 16]. Bcl6 is best known as a transcriptional repressor
with critical functions in germinal center responses and as a potent B cell
oncogene[17]. Interestingly, thymocytes
strongly up-regulate Bcl6 as proliferation ceases during the DN3-DP
transition (www.Immgen.org), but the regulation and functions of Bcl6
during T cell development have not been defined.There are conflicting reports on the role of IL-7 signaling in β-selection.
IL7R expression is not lost until the ISP stage[18], but DN4 thymocytes were reported to be unresponsive to IL-7[19]. Studies using antibodies to block IL-7
signaling in vitro concluded that IL-7 signaling is dispensable for
β-selection of DN3 cells[20]. In
contrast, another group reported, using a similar approach, that IL-7 signaling is required
for DN4 survival but not proliferation[21].
Yet other studies in which IL-7 signaling was artificially augmented in
vitro concluded that IL-7 signaling actively inhibits β-selection, in
part by impairing expression of Tcf7 (encoding TCF1), Lef1
and Rorc[18]. Therefore,
in vitro studies have reached conflicting conclusions on the importance
of IL-7 signaling during β-selection.Here, we report that early post-β-selection DN3b and DN4 thymocytes respond
to IL-7 in vitro and in vivo. IL-7 signaling acutely
induces many genes involved in protein translation, cell growth and metabolism, and also
represses Bcl6. Accordingly, we showed that IL-7 is required in
vivo for robust clonal expansion, to enforce the canonical
DN3b–DN4-ISP-DP differentiation sequence, and to prevent premature
Tcra rearrangement in DN thymocytes. Thus, we identified a novel role for
IL-7 signaling during β-selection that includes repression of Bcl6
to allow self-renewal of DN4 cells. In contrast to IL-7 functions at earlier and later
stages of T cell development, the functions of IL-7 during β-selection cannot be
replaced by BCL2.
RESULTS
IL-7 signaling in post-β-selection DN thymocytes
We first compared IL7R expression and function in pre- versus
post-β-selection DN thymocytes. In contrast to prior studies, we used
icTCRβ to positively identify β-selected cells within the heterogeneous
DN3 and DN4 subsets (Supplementary Fig.
1)[19]. As expected,
pre-selection icTCRβ− DN3a cells were IL7Rhi and
robustly phosphorylated STAT5 after IL-7 stimulation in vitro (Fig. 1a). Post-selection DN3b and DN4 cells also
expressed IL7R and IL-7 stimulation induced pSTAT5. Normalized amounts of IL7R and
IL-7-induced STAT5 phosphorylation were highest in DN3b and lowest in DN4 cells.
Nonetheless, IL-7 stimulation increased survival of DN3a, DN3b and DN4 cells to similar
extents (Fig. 1a). Thus, pre-selection DN3a and
post-selection DN3b–DN4 thymocytes were similarly responsive to IL-7-mediated
survival signaling in vitro. Importantly, fresh ex vivo
DN3b and DN4Il7r+/+ wild-type (WT) thymocytes expressed
considerably higher amounts of pSTAT5 and murineBcl2 (mBcl2) than those from
Il7r−/− mice (Fig. 1b), indicating that they respond to physiological levels of IL-7 produced
intrathymically.
Figure 1
Expression and function of IL-7R in pre- and post-β-selection thymocytes.
(a) Flow cytometry of DN3a
(CD25+icTCRβ−), DN3b
(CD25+icTCRβ+) and DN4
(CD25−icTCRβ+) thymocytes from wild-type mice
(gating strategy, Supplementary Fig.
1) and stained with antibody to IL-7R (Anti-IL-7R), plotted with the
fluorescence-minus-one background control (top left), or cultured for 20’ with (+)
or without (−) IL-7 and stained with antibody to phosphorylated STAT5 (p-STAT5)
(bottom left); right, viability of cells cultured for 10-24 h with or without IL-7,
analyzed by staining with propidium iodide and flow cytometry. *P
≤ _0.0001 (unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test).
(b) Flow cytometry of DN3a, DN3b and DN4
Il7r+/+ or
Il7r−/− thymocytes that were immediately
fixed, permeabilized and stained with antibody to p-STAT5 (left), or stained with antibody
to mouse Bcl-2 (mBcl-2), plotted with background control as in a (right). Due to limited
cellularity, p-STAT5 was analyzed in total DN3 cells from
Il7r−/− mice. Numbers in plots (a, top left,
and b) indicate normalized median fluorescence intensity of each marker, calculated by
subtraction of the median fluorescence intensity of the fluorescence-minus-one control
from that of fully stained cells. Numbers in a (bottom left) indicate normalized median
fluorescence intensity p-STAT5 calculated by subtracting the median fluorescence intensity
of cells cultured without IL-7 from that of cells cultured with IL-7. Flow cytometry
histograms are are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
Viability graphs in a, right, show mean and s.d. of two biological replicates with two
technical replicates per group in a, right.
To determine if humanBCL2 can restore both pre- and
post-β-selection compartments in IL-7-deficient mice, we generated transgenic
Il7r−/− mice expressing
BCL2 under control of the Lck-proximal promoter.
Accordingly, hBcl-2 was expressed in some DN2 cells and in all downstream cells (Fig. 2a). Although hBcl-2 increased DN3a cell numbers
30-fold in Il7r−/− mice, it did not increase
cellularity of the DN3b, DN4 or DP compartments (Fig.
2b). However, hBcl-2 significantly restored CD4 and CD8 SP thymocyte cellularity,
7- and 10-fold, respectively. These findings identify an important function for IL-7
signaling during β-selection in vivo that, in contrast to earlier
and later stages of T cell development, cannot be replaced by BCL2.
Figure 2
hBcl-2 fails to compensate for loss of IL-7 signaling during
β-selection. Thymocytes were counted and analyzed by flow cytomtery to calculate
the frequency and total number of cells in each subset. (a) hBcl-2 expression
(open) versus FMO control (shaded) in DN2, DN3, and DN4 thymocytes (gated as shown in
Supplementary Fig. 1a, c) as
well as DP, CD4 and CD8 subsets from Il7r−/−
BCL2 mice. Numbers shown in the top right corner of each histogram depict
normalized median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of hBcl-2 calculated by subtracting the MFI
of the FMO from that of fully stained cells. Similar results were obtained in 3 individual
experiments. (b) Bar graphs show the mean (+/− SD) number of cells in
each subset for each strain: Il7r+/+ (n=4),
Il7r−/− (n=9) and
Il7r−/−
BCL2 (n=9). The significance of differences between
genotypes was assessed using Student’s t-test as described for
Fig. 1: *P<0.0001.
Transcriptional responses to IL-7
The failure of BCL2 to restore post-β-selection DN or DP
thymocyte compartments in Il7r−/− mice
suggested that IL-7 activates other pathways critical for β-selection in
vivo. Therefore, we used Illumina gene expression profiling to globally
identify pathways acutely regulated by IL-7 in DN3a, DN3b and DN4 cells. Importantly, all
3 subsets showed robust induction of direct Jak-STAT target genes after 3h of IL-7
stimulation (Fig. 3a). This group included
Bcl2 and Cish, Socs2 and Socs3,
feedback regulators of Jak-STAT signaling, as well as Pim1, Tfrc
(Cd71) and Ccnd2. Thus, in addition to inducing
survival genes, IL-7 acutely regulates expression of trophic receptors and cell cycle
regulators in pre- and post-β-selection DN thymocytes.
Figure 3
Transcriptional response to IL-7 in DN3a, DN3b and DN4 thymocytes. Sorted
subsets (4 biological replicates) were cultured with IL-7 (10 ng/ml) or media for 3h prior
to isolating RNA and performing Illumina Ref8v2 gene expression profiling. After
pre-processing, a paired empirical Bayes moderated t-test with
Benjamin-Hochberg correction for multiple testing was conducted using Limma to select
probe-sets significantly altered by IL-7 in each subset (FDR
q<0.05), which were then collapsed into non-redundant gene lists.
(a,b) Bar graphs depict the fold-change (FC) ratio
(IL-7-stimulated/unstimulated) of normalized expression values for function-based groups
of genes. Asterisks highlight genes more robustly induced by IL-7 in post-selection DN3b
and DN4 relative to pre-selection DN3a cells. FC ratios and FDR-adjusted
q-values for each gene are indicated in Supplementary Table 2. ND: not
detected.
The response to IL-7 stimulation was robust and complex in all 3 subsets,
although the number of transcripts significantly altered by IL-7 declined substantially as
DN3a cells matured into DN3b and DN4 cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Il-7 stimulation acutely altered expression of
large numbers of genes involved in signaling, translation, metabolism and cell growth
(Supplementary Fig. 2b, c;
Supplementary Table 1, 2). The most potently induced
nutrient transporter was Slc7a5 (Supplementary Fig. 2c), which encodes a large neutral amino acid
transporter required for metabolic reprogramming during T cell activation and effector
differentiation[22]. The signaling
group included several genes encoding GTP binding proteins, Ras-MAPK and PI3K–mTOR
proteins as well as signaling receptors (Fig. 3b).
Finally, IL-7 increased expression of transcriptional regulators, most notably
Bhlhe40 (Fig. 3b), whose
importance in T cell development is unknown. Although the magnitude and significance of
IL-7-induced transcriptional changes were generally more robust in pre-selection DN3a
cells, some genes in each category were more highly induced in post-β-selection DN
cells (starred in Fig. 3), suggesting co-operative
regulation with pre-TCR signaling.
IL-7 promotes DN4 cell growth and proliferation
Since IL-7 significantly increased expression of many genes that regulate
metabolism, signaling and growth, we evaluated the impact of IL-7 deficiency on cell size,
a reflection of cellular metabolism and proliferation during β-selection. Although
the size of DN3b cells from Il7r+/+ vs
Il7r−/− mice was similar,
Il7r−/− DN4 cells were much smaller than
their WT counterparts, suggesting loss of trophic signaling (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, IL-7deficiency significantly impaired BrDU uptake by
Il7r−/− DN4 cells, but not DN3b cells (Fig. 4b). BCL2 over-expression did not
prevent atrophy or restore proliferation of
Il7r−/− DN4 cells, strongly suggesting that
IL-7 signaling is required to maintain DN4 thymocyte trophic responses and proliferation
in vivo, rather than simply to maintain Bcl2-dependent survival.
Figure 4
IL-7 signaling promotes DN4 growth and proliferation in vivo.
(a) Flow cytometric analysis of forward scatter (FSC), an indicator of cell
size and metabolism, of each subset identified as described in Supplementary Fig. 1.:
Il7r+/+ (shaded) versus
Il7r−/− (open) (Top).
Il7r+/+ (shaded) versus
Il7r (open) (Bottom).
(b) Flow cytometric quantification of BrdU incorporation in DN4 cells (Top)
from Il7r+/+ and
Il7r−/− mice, assessed 2h after the first
BrdU injection and identified as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Bar graphs show % BrdU+ cells
(mean +/− SD) in each subset from
Il7r+/+Il7r−/−
and Il7r−/−
BCL2 mice (Bottom) (3 biological replicates/group). (c) Flow
cytometric analysis of CD71 (Top) or CD98 (Bottom) vs CD25 expression, shown as 5%
probability contour plots gated on DN CD3 Lin icTCRβ+ thymocytes
(d) Histograms show flow cytometric quantification of CD71 expression (Top)
or CFSE (Bottom) after WT DN4 thymocytes were cultured in Med (shaded) or IL-7 (open) for
15 or 40h. (e) WT DN4 thymocytes (5×103/well, indicated by
dotted horizontal line) were cultured with OP9-DL4 cells and media containing the
indicated IL-7 concentrations for 48h. Bar graphs show the mean (+/− SD) number of
DN cells recovered (3 technical replicates/group). The significance of differences between
groups was assessed in (b) and (e) using one-way ANOVA with
Newman-Keuls post hoc t-test. Similar results were obtained in 3
(a, b, c, e) or 2 independent experiments (d).
*P<0.001, **P<0.01,
***P<0.05.
DN3b and DN4 cells self-renew extensively in a pre-TCR-dependent fashion when
cultured with OP9 stromal cells expressing Delta-like Notch ligands and IL-7, and
up-regulation of trophic receptors such as CD71 and CD98 (neutral amino acid transporter)
shows Notch-dependence in these assays[8, 23]. Because Notch signaling can regulate IL7R
expression in some contexts[24, 25], Notch effects on trophic receptors could be
IL-7-mediated. We therefore assessed the requirement for IL-7 signaling for inducing CD71
and CD98 during β-selection in vivo. As expected, WT DN3b and DN4
cells were CD71hi CD98hi (Fig.
4c). In striking contrast, Il7r−/−
DN4 cells lacked these trophic receptors, as well as CD27, CD28 and CD24 (data not shown),
although DN3b cells expressed normal amounts of these markers. Once again, hBcl-2 did not
restore CD71 and CD98 expression to Il7r−/−
DN4 cells. Although IL-7 increased CD71 expression in stromal-cell free cultures, it did
not stimulate DN4 cell proliferation (Fig. 4d),
demonstrating that IL-7 signaling cannot promote DN4 self-renewal without Notch
activation. Furthermore, Notch-induced proliferation of DN4 cells is IL-7-dependent (Fig. 4e). Collectively, these experiments demonstrate
that IL-7 signaling maintains DN4 nutrient receptor expression, and that Notch and IL-7
co-operate to promote self-renewal of DN4 cells.
IL-7 enforces the canonical DN3b–DN4-ISP sequence
DN4 cells are also referred to as “pre-DP” cells because they
rapidly generate DP progeny when cultured without stroma or cytokines[26]. Therefore, we evaluated the differentiation
potential and kinetics of WT versus Il7−/−
DN3b and DN4 cells in stromal cell-free cultures with and without exogenous IL-7.
Surprisingly, Il7−/− DN3b cells generated
significantly more DP progeny than WT DN3b cells after 15h of culture without IL-7 (Fig. 5a). However, both DN and ISP progeny of
Il7−/− DN3b cells retained CD25 expression
(Supplementary Fig. 3a),
suggesting that mutant DN3b cells generated ISP cells without obviously passing through
the CD25− DN4 stage.
Il7−/−DN4 cells also generated significantly
more DP progeny than WT DN4 cells after 15h, demonstrating that they have enhanced
“pre-DP” capacity (Fig. 5b).
Strikingly, most Il7−/−DN4 cells became DP
within 5h and appeared not to pass through the ISP stage, whereas WT DN4 cells generated
only ISP intermediates during this time (Fig. 5c).
IL-7 addition to DN3b cells also increased ISP frequency at the expense of DP cell
generation, but this impact of IL-7 was significant only for
Il7−/−DN3b cells (Supplementary Fig. 3b). IL-7 also
increased ISP frequency in cultures of WT but not
Il7−/− DN4 progenitors, (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 3b), indicating that
Il7−/− DN4 cells, in contrast to WT DN4
cells, are insensitive to IL-7. Collectively, these experiments suggest that
Il7−/− DN3b cells generate ISP and DP
progeny without obviously passing through the DN4 stage, whereas
Il7−/− DN4 cells rapidly generate DP progeny
without obviously passing through the ISP stage.
Figure 5
IL-7 signaling delays DN3b and DN4 cell differentiation into DP thymocytes. DN3b
or DN4 cells from Il7+/+ and
Il7−/− mice were cultured in the absence of
stromal cells with or without IL-7 and analyzed by flow cytometry to assess the impact of
IL-7 on their differentiation. (a) CD4 versus CD8 expression after DN3b cells
from Il7+/+ (white, 3 technical replicates/group) and
Il7−/− (black, 4 technical replicates/group)
mice were cultured for 15h without (Top) or with (Bottom) IL-7 (Left). Bar graphs show the
% (mean +/− SD) of each subset after culture: DN
(icTCRβ+ CD4 CD8, ISP (icTCRβ+ CD4
CD8+) and DP (icTCRβ+ CD4+ CD8+)
(Right). (b,c) DN4 cells from each genotype were cultured and analyzed by
flow cytometry to assess the impact of IL-7 on their differentiation as described for
(a). Bar graphs and contour plots show CD4 and CD8 expression on DN4
progeny after 15h without (Top) or with (Bottom) IL-7 (b, 4 technical
replicates/genotype/group), or after 5h without IL-7 (c, 3 technical
replicates/genotype/group). The significance of differences between means was calculated
using Student’s t-test as described for Fig. 1: *P<0.0001,
**P<0.001, ***P≤0.01,
****P<0.05. Similar results were obtained in at least 3
independent experiments (a, b, c).
Bcl6 deletion improves DN4 self-renewal
We noted that Bcl6 was the most significantly down-regulated
gene after IL-7 treatment of DN3a, DN3b and DN4 cells, with FDR-adjusted
q-values of 10−18,
4.2×10−20 and 2×10−12,
respectively (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Table 2). Furthermore,
DN3b and DN4 cells from Il7−/− mice expressed
significantly more Bcl6 mRNA than their WT counterparts, suggesting loss
of IL-7-mediated repression. Interestingly, normal thymocytes strongly up-regulate
Bcl6 expression as proliferation ceases during the DN3-DP transition
(www.Immgen.org), but its functions in T cell development have not yet been
identified. Therefore, we asked whether IL-7-induced repression of Bcl6
in DN4 cells is important for differentiation and self-renewal during β-selection.
Because Bcl6−/− mice develop a lethal
inflammatory disease[27, 28], we generated DN4 thymocytes by co-culturing WT or
Bcl6−/− fetal liver hematopoietic progenitor
cells with OP9-DL4 cells, WT and Bcl6−/− DN4
cells sorted from these co-cultures generated similar frequencies of ISP and DP cells in
the presence and absence of IL-7 (Fig. 6b),
suggesting that Bcl6 does not obviously regulate differentiation during
β-selection. Similar to the experiment shown in Fig.
4c, IL-7 significantly increased the number of WT DN4 cells recovered after 2
days (Fig. 6c). Interestingly, Bcl6
deficiency significantly increased recovery of DN4 cells in the absence of IL-7 (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, the number of
Bcl6−/− DN4 cells recovered from cultures
without IL-7 was not significantly different from the number of WT DN4 cells recovered
from cultures with IL-7, suggesting that repression of Bcl6 is a major
mechanism by which IL-7 induces DN4 self-renewal. Nonetheless, IL-7 addition further
augmented proliferation of Bcl6−/− DN4 cells,
suggesting that Bcl6 deletion does not fully recapitulate the
proliferation-inducing functions of IL-7.
Figure 6
Deletion of Bcl6 improves the self-renewal of DN4 cells in the
absence of IL-7. (a) Bcl6 expression in DN3a, DN3b and DN4
wild-type cells cultured in IL-7, presented relative to its expression in their
counterparts cultured in medium alone (as in Fig. 3;
FDR-adjusted q values, Supplementary Table 2) (left), and quantitative RT–PCR analysis of
Bcl6 mRNA in DN3b and DN4 Il7+/+ and
Il7−/− thymocytes, normalized to results
obtained for Cd45 mRNA. (b) Quantification of cells in the
DN, ISP and DP subsets (as in Fig. 5a) among the
progeny of DN4 cells sorted from co-cultures of Bcl6+/+ and
Bcl6−/− fetal liver hematopoietic progenitor
cells cultured for 9 d with OP9-DL4 cells, then re-cultured (after sorting) for 48 h with
or without IL-7 (left), and expression of CD4 versus CD8 by the sorted progeny of DN4
cells cultured with or without IL-7 (right), analyzed by flow cytometry (right).
(c) Quantification of DN cells among the sorted DN4 cells in b cultured
without or with IL-7. Each symbol represents an independent OP9 culture from two
Bcl6+/+ or three
Bcl6−/− individual fetuses; small horizontal
lines indicate the mean (±s.d.). *P < 0.0001,
**P ≤ 0.01 (Student’s t-test (a)).
Data are representative of two experiments with similar results (mean and s.d. of n = 3
technical replicates per group in a) or one experiment (b,c; mean and s.d. of n = 2
(Bcl6+/+) or 3
(Bcl6−/−) fetuses (three replicate cultures
each)).
IL-7 impact on ISP thymocytes
We also investigated ISP generation in the absence of IL-7 signaling in
vivo. ISP numbers (defined as shown in Supplementary Fig. 4a) were 100-fold lower in
Il7r−/− than
Il7r+/+ mice (Fig. 7a),
in keeping with the reduced pools of all upstream progenitors (Fig. 2b). However, in striking contrast to
Il7r−/− DN4 cells,
Il7r−/− ISP were large CD71hi
CD98hi cells, similar to WT ISP (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Expression of CD71 and CD98 in eDP and lDP also
persisted in the absence of IL-7 signaling (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Il7+/+ and
Il7−/− ISP generated DP progeny in
vitro with similar kinetics (Fig. 7b),
suggesting that IL-7 deficiency does not impact the ISP-DP transition. Thus, although loss
of IL-7 signaling impaired DN4 trophic responses and accelerated their differentiation, it
did not impact these functions in ISP or DP cells. Nonetheless,
Il7r−/− ISP generated in
vivo (Fig. 7a) and in
vitro (Supplementary Fig.
3a) abnormally expressed CD25, suggesting that in the absence of IL-7 signaling,
most ISP seem to arise directly from CD25+ DN3b cells rather than from
CD25− DN4 cells.
Figure 7
Il7r−/− DN4 thymocytes are not the
precursors of ISP cell subset. (a) Left, thymocytes from
Il7+/+ (n=4) and
Il7r−/− (n=6) mice were
counted and analyzed by flow cytometry to identify ISP cells as CD3 CD24+ cells
within the Lin CD4 CD8+ icTCRβ+ subset (See Supplementary Figure 4a). Right,
contour plots show representative CD8 vs CD25 distribution gated on Lin CD3 CD4
icTCRβ+ thymocytes. Gates identify ISP (CD25−/+
CD8+), DN4 (CD25 CD8−/lo) and DN3b (CD25+
CD8−/lo) cells in each strain. (b) Sorted ISP cells from
each genotype were cultured for 5h (Top) or 15h (Bottom) without IL-7 (3 technical
replicates/time point/genotype) and analyzed by flow cytometry as described for Fig. 5 to identify DP (CD4+ CD8+)
and ISP (CD4 CD8+) cells. (c, d) Thymocytes from
Il7r+/+ and
Il7r−/− mice were harvested 2, 24 and 48h
after BrdU injection (n=3 biological replicates/time-point/genotype) and
analyzed by flow cytometry to measure % BrdU+ (mean +/− SD)
cells in DN3a (c), and DN3b (gray filled line), DN4 (black dashed line) and
ISP (black filled line) subsets (d). Data for the 2h time-point were
re-plotted here from Fig. 4b for comparison.
Statistical significance in (a) was assessed using Student’s
t-test as described for Fig. 1:
*P<0.0001. Similar results were obtained in 3 (a,
b) or 2 (c, d) independent experiments.
To directly evaluate the DN3b–DP transition in vivo, we
tracked differentiation of proliferating cells in
Il7r−/− versus
Il7r+/+ mice at various times after BrdU injection. As
expected, DN3a cells from both strains of mice were quiescent (mostly
BrdU−) 2h after injection, but accumulated label from proliferating
precursors over the next 24–48h (Fig. 7c).
Thus, the absence of intrathymic IL-7 signaling did not impact DN3a generation from
proliferating precursors but greatly decreased DN3a survival (Fig. 2). In contrast to quiescent DN3a cells, 65–75% of
WT DN3b, DN4 and ISP cells were BrdU+ after 2h, confirming that each subset is
rapidly cycling (Fig. 7d). Labeled DN3b cells
decreased after 24h, consistent with derivation from quiescent DN3a precursors, whereas
DN4 and ISP cells were highly labeled, consistent with their derivation from cycling DN3b
and DN4 precursors, respectively. As shown earlier (Fig.
4), only ∼10% of
Il7r−/− DN4 cells were BrdU+ 2h
after injection. However, 70–90% of
Il7r−/− DN3b cells were BrdU+
(Fig. 7d), suggesting that most DN4 cells are
derived from quiescent DN3a cells rather than cycling DN3b cells in Il7r
mutant mice. Indeed, BrdU accumulated in
Il7r−/− DN4 cells slowly over the next 2
days, similar to both WT and mutant DN3a cells. Furthermore,
Il7r−/− ISP were highly labelled after 24h,
suggesting that they are not derived from quiescent DN4 cells, but directly from cycling
DN3b cells.
Impact of IL-7 on Tcra recombination
Primary TCRA recombination involving 3’ Vα and
5’ Jα gene segments normally initiates in eDP cells as they become
quiescent lDP cells, with secondary recombination events that use more distal gene
segments occurring exclusively in non-cycling lDP cells[10, 29]. Since DN4 cells
generated in the absence of IL-7 were abnormally quiescent, we asked whether they had
undergone premature Tcra recombination. We sorted DN4, ISP and eDP and
lDP thymocytes from Il7−/− versus
Il7+/+ mice and used qPCR to quantify primary
Tcra rearrangements involving 3’ Vα17
(Trav17) and 5’ Jα61
(Traj61) and Jα56
(Traj56) as well as secondary rearrangements involving more 5’
Vα12 (Trav12) and 3’
Jα42 (Traj42),
Jα30 (Traj30) and
Jα17 (Traj17) segments.As expected, we detected very low amounts of primary and secondary
Tcra rearrangements in cycling WT DN4, ISP and CD71+
CD98+ eDP cells, whereas we detected high levels of both primary and
secondary rearrangements in post-mitotic CD71− CD98−
lDP cells (Fig. 8a,b). In striking contrast,
Il7−/− DN4 cells had abundant primary and
secondary rearrangements that were comparable in frequency to those found in WT lDP cells.
Thus, abnormally quiescent DN4 cells from IL-7-deficient mice undergo premature and
extensive Tcra recombination. Nonetheless,
Il7−/− ISP and eDP cells had very low levels
of both primary and secondary Tcra rearrangements, similar to levels seen
in WT ISP and eDP cells. Furthermore, we did not detect Tcra
rearrangements in Il7−/− DN3b cells (data not
shown). The sharp contrast in Tcra rearrangement status between quiescent
DN4 relative to cycling ISP and eDP cells from
Il7−/− mice provides further evidence that
DN4 cells are not precursors of ISP and eDP cells in these mutant mice.
Figure 8
IL-7 signaling prevents premature recombination of Tcra locus
in DN4 subset. (a,b) Genomic DNA from DN4, ISP, eDP (CD71hi
FSChi) and lDP (CD71lo FSClo) thymocytes was analyzed
by qPCR to measure Vα-to-Jα
recombination using primers for Trav17 (Vα17) and proximal
Traj61 (Jα61) and Traj56 (Jα56)
segments (a), or primers for Trav12 (which detect multiple,
widely distributed Trav12 (Vα12) family members) and central
Traj42 (Jα42) and Traj30 (Jα30)
segments vs distal Traj17 (Jα17) segment (b). Bar
graphs show relative Jα usage (mean ± SD) in each subset,
normalized to levels detected in unfractionated WT thymocytes (n=4, 2
biological replicates/subset/genotype and 2 technical replicate/sort). ND: not detected.
(c) Bar graphs depict normalized expression values (Log2 scale)
for Rag1, Rag2 and Cish from the Illumina mRNA
expression profiling shown in Fig. 3. FDR-adjusted
q-values for each comparison are indicated: *FDR
q<0.0001. (d) qRT–PCR quantification of
Rag1 and Rag2 mRNA in sorted
Il7+/+ and
Il7−/− DN4 thymocytes (normalized to
CD45, 3 technical replicates/group). The significance of differences
between groups was assessed using Student’s t-test as described
for Fig. 1: *P<0.0001,
**P<0.01. (e) Western blotting for Rag2 (top) and
β-actin (bottom) protein in the indicated subsets from
Il7+/+ and
Il7−/− thymi. Protein extracts from total
Rag2+/+ and
Rag2−/− thymocytes were used as positive and
negative controls, respectively. Similar results for each subset were obtained in 2 or
more (a, b), 1 (d) and 3 (e) independent
experiments.
The extensive rearrangement of Tcra in
Il7−/− DN4 cells suggested that they
prematurely up-regulated Rag1/2 expression. However, our gene expression
profiling experiments showed that IL-7 treatment (for 3 h) did not acutely decrease
Rag1/2 expression in DN3b or DN4 thymocytes, in contrast to direct
STAT5 targets such as Cish (Fig. 8c)
and Bcl6 (Fig. 6a). Thus,
Rag genes do not appear to be direct transcriptional targets of IL-7 in
DN thymocytes. Nonetheless, Rag1 and Rag2 mRNA levels
were significantly higher in DN4 cells isolated from
Il7−/− relative to WT mice (Fig. 8d), likely reflecting their accelerated
differentiation in the absence of IL-7. Interestingly, Rag2 undergoes
cyclin-A/cdk2-mediated proteolysis during S-phase to minimize the oncogenic potential of
Rag-induced DNA breaks in cycling cells[30] . Since IL-7-deficient DN4 cells were abnormally quiescent, we also
evaluated Rag2 protein abundance by immunoblotting (Fig.
8e). As expected, Rag2 expression was low in cycling DN3b and eDP cells but high
in quiescent lDP cells from both WT and Il7−/−
mice. In striking contrast, Rag2 was barely detectable in cycling DN4 cells from WT mice,
but was readily detected in quiescent DN4 cells from
Il7−/− mice, even though the low DN4
abundance in Il7−/− mice necessitated
under-loading this lane. Notably, Rag2 expression was not elevated in cycling DN3b cells
from Il7−/− mice, suggesting that loss of IL-7
signaling is not sufficient to increase Rag2 in cycling cells. Collectively, these data
suggest that IL-7 deficiency promotes premature Rag1/2 re-expression and
Tcra rearrangement by preventing cycling and accelerating
differentiation of DN4 cells (summarized in Supplementary. Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION
Our study has demonstrated that the absence of intrathymic IL-7 signaling causes
several striking abnormalities during β-selection that were not ameliorated by
transgenic BCL2. During β-selection in WT mice, the canonical
differentiation sequence is linear: DN3a–DN3b–DN4-ISP-eDP-lDP. In contrast,
we provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that DP cells
arise via 2 abnormal pathways in IL-7 mutant mice. In one pathway, DN3a cells generate DN4
cells that prematurely up-regulate Bcl6, fail to self-renew and rapidly
differentiate into lDP cells without obviously passing through the ISP stage. IL-7-deficient
quiescent DN4 cells also prematurely re-express Rag1 and
Rag2, allowing premature primary and secondary Tcra
recombination. However, there is also a “cycling” pathway, in which some
DN3a cells generate cycling DN3b progeny that differentiate into DP cells via ISP
intermediates that express CD25, and thus do not appear to transit through the DN4 stage.
The abnormal retention of CD25 by proliferating post-β-selection cells in IL-7
mutant mice may suggest abnormal persistence of Notch signaling, since
Il2ra is a direct Notch target in DN thymocytes[31]. Interestingly, IL-7 increased ISP frequency when added to WT
DN3b and DN4 cells or to Il7−/− DN3b cells.
Since ISP cells do not express IL7R[18],
IL-7 acts on DN3b and/or DN4 cells to enhance ISP generation and/or delay their
differentiation into DP cells. Thus, IL-7 signaling in DN3 and DN4 cells may delay some
aspects of differentiation during the DN3b–DP transition. Collectively these
findings demonstrate that IL-7 signaling is required to maintain DN4 self-renewal, to
enforce the canonical DN3a–DN3b–DN4-ISP-DP differentiation sequence, and to
delay Tcra rearrangement until after proliferation ceases during thymocyte
β-selection.In agreement with a previous study[21], we found that IL7R expression was relatively higher in pre-TCR-signaled
DN3b cells than in DN3a cells. However, in contrast to studies examining total DN3 and DN4
cells[19], we found that IL-7 robustly
induces STAT5 phosphorylation and significantly increases Bcl2 mRNA in
icTCRβ+ DN3b and DN4 thymocytes in vitro. Furthermore,
we showed that IL-7 induces pSTAT5 and maintains mBcl-2 protein levels in DN3b and DN4 cells
in vivo. Although a previous study concluded that IL-7 is needed to
maintain survival but not proliferation of fetal DN4 thymocytes[21], we found that over-expression of hBcl-2 in
Il7r−/− mice did not restore DN3b, CD4, CD8
ISP or DP cells, despite significantly restoring the DN3a, CD4 and CD8 SP subsets. While we
cannot rule out that IL-7 functions differ between fetal versus adult DN4 cells, our
findings demonstrate that in addition to pre-TCR and Notch1, IL-7 signaling is maintained
during β-selection in vivo and has important functions that cannot
be replaced by BCL2.Our study suggests that IL-7 signaling is required to prevent atrophy of DN4 cells
and maintain their proliferation in vivo. Furthermore, IL-7 greatly
enhanced Notch-dependent DN4 self-renewal in vitro. We identified several
mechanisms underlying the trophic and pro-proliferative functions of IL-7 during
β-selection. First, IL-7 maintained expression of CD71 and CD98 nutrient receptors
in DN4 thymocytes, previously reported to be Notch-dependent in
vitro[8, 23]. However, Notch activation sustains IL7R expression in some
contexts[24, 25], so the Notch effect on CD71 and CD98 expression may be indirect.
Indeed, treatment with IL-7 alone increased Cd71 mRNA and protein
expression in DN4 thymocytes, but was not sufficient to induce DN4 proliferation in the
absence of Notch activation. Therefore, our data suggest that IL-7 collaborates with Notch1
to maintain nutrient receptor expression and proliferation in DN4 thymocytes. Second, IL-7
induces expression of a surprisingly complex array of cell growth regulators in DN
thymocytes, including metabolic enzymes, translational regulators and nutrient transporters.
Most genes were more potently induced in pre-selection DN3a cells, suggesting that the
profound impact of IL-7 during β-selection could be partly due to changes induced
prior to pre-TCR expression. Nonetheless, a small group of genes were more potently induced
in post-selection DN thymocytes, suggesting that they may be co-operatively regulated by
pre-TCR plus IL-7 signaling. Finally, Bcl6 deletion partially restored DN4
self-renewal in the absence of IL-7, revealing that repression of Bcl6 is
an important function of IL-7 during β-selection. Although Bcl6
promotes self-renewal of pre-B cells by limiting p53-induced apoptosis[15], hBcl-2 over-expression did not restore DN4
cellularity in IL-7-deficient mice. Thus, Bcl6 likely limits DN4
self-renewal by inhibiting proliferation, perhaps by repressing
Myc[32], rather than by
simply promoting survival. Overall, our data suggest that during β-selection, IL-7
co-operates with pre-TCR-Notch signaling to re-program metabolism and translation to meet
the biosynthetic demands of clonal expansion by inducing large number of metabolic
regulators and repressing Bcl6. This prominent role for IL-7 in regulating
metabolism and proliferation of T cell precursors likely explains why this signaling pathway
is frequently mutated in T cell leukemia[33].Among cell growth regulators induced by IL-7, regulators of PI3K–mTOR
signaling pathway are likely to be particularly important for β-selection. The
importance of PI3K signaling in β-selection was first revealed by the observation
that deletion of Pten, a lipid phosphatase that counteracts PI3K function,
greatly restores the DP thymocyte pool in mice with mutations that compromise pre-TCR or
IL7R signaling[34]. Pi3kcd
is the isoform required for β-selection[35], and its expression was acutely enhanced by IL-7 in both pre- and
post-β-selection thymocytes, suggesting a positive feedback loop. PI3K leads to AKT
activation and mTOR signaling to increase nutrient uptake and metabolism during
proliferation. However, serum and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase (SGK), rather than
AKT, may control cell growth and metabolism downstream of mTOR signaling[36]. Since Sgk1 was more strongly
induced by IL-7 in DN3b and DN4 cells than in DN3a cells, this kinase may have particularly
important roles for inducing clonal expansion of pre-TCR+ cells.Although pre-TCR signaling is thought to activate the Eα enhancer as early
as the DN4 stage[12, 37, 38], in IL-7-sufficient
mice very little Tcra recombination occurs until the DP stage. However,
Il7−/− DN4 cells had high levels of primary
and secondary Tcra rearrangements, similar to levels in WT lDP cells,
revealing that IL-7 signaling normally prevents Tcra rearrangement in DN4
thymocytes. Several possible mechanisms could underlie this role for IL-7. During B cell
development, IL-7-induced STAT5 tetramers directly repress Igk
transcription and rearrangement via an epigenetic mechanism[13,14]. However,
Eα does not contain consensus STAT5 binding sites, although
several low stringency motifs are present (data not shown). Furthermore, a mechanism
invoking active IL-7-induced repression of Tcra rearrangement does not
readily explain the differential abundance of Tcra rearrangements in
Il7−/− DN4 and lDP relative to
Il7−/− ISP and eDP cells.During B cell development, pre-BCR and IL-7 signaling co-operate to down-regulate
Rag1/2 expression by inhibiting Foxo transcriptions factors, thus
preventing V(D)J recombination during pre-BCR-induced clonal expansion[39, 40, 41]. In contrast, IL-7 did not induce acute
changes in Rag1/2 expression in post-β-selection thymocytes in our
study. Nonetheless, DN4 cells generated in IL-7-deficient mice had higher steady mRNA
levels, likely reflecting their accelerated differentiation kinetics. We also documented
that non-cycling DN4 thymocytes from IL-7-deficient mice expressed higher Rag2 protein than
cycling DN4 cells from WT mice, consistent with decreased cyclin-A-cdk2-mediated proteolysis
of Rag2[30]. Therefore, our data suggest
that IL-7 indirectly inhibits Tcra rearrangement by promoting DN4 cell
proliferation and Rag2 degradation rather than by directly repressing
Rag1/2 expression. Collectively, our study shows that thymocyte
β-selection is orchestrated by a complex interplay between pre-TCR, Notch and IL7R
signaling.
ONLINE METHODS
Mice
C57BL/6J (referred to as WT, Il7r+/+or
Il7+/+) and
Il7r−/−[42] mice were purchased (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME.
Il7−/− mice[43] were kindly provided by Dr. Rachel Gerstein (University of
Massachusetts, Worchester Campus). BCL2transgenic mice used to generate
Il7r−/− mice to generate
Il7r−/−
BCL2mice were previously described[44]. Bcl6+/− mice[27] were kindly provided by Dr. Riccardo
Dalla-Favera (University of Colombia, NY). Genotypes were determined by PCR amplification
of tail DNA as described previously[44].
For all experiments, thymocytes were harvested from 4–6 week-old mice. All mice
were bred in the specific pathogen-free facility of Toronto Centre for Phenogenomics
(Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and procedures were approved by its Animal Care Committee,
following guidelines from the Canadian Council on Animal Care.
Flow Cytometry
Thymocyte single-cell suspensions were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated
antibodies and secondary reagents and immunofluorescence was analyzed on a FACSLSR-II (BD
Biosciences, San Jose, CA) as previously described[23]. Data files were analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Dead
cells and debris were excluded based on staining with propidium iodide (unfixed cells) or
Fixable Blue Viability dye (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), versus forward scatter
profiles. Thymocytes were stained with a cocktail of APC-conjugated antibodies specific
for lineage (Lin) markers (CD19, Gr1, CD11b, NK1.1, δγTCR and CD11c)
together with antibodies recognizing CD3 (Alexa-700), CD4 (EF450), CD8 (APC-EF780), CD25
(PE-Cy7) and CD71 (FITC) and CD98 (PE). To distinguish DN2 from DN3 cells (Fig. 2) CD44 (PE) was used instead of CD98). After gating
out Lin+ cells, DN3a (CD25+ CD71lo CD98lo,
DN3b (CD25+ CD71hi CD98hi) and DN4
(Il7+/+: CD25− CD71hi
CD98hi; Il7−/−:
CD25−CD71hi/lo CD98hi/lo) thymocytes were
sorted using a FACS AriaII (BD Biosciences). Purity was >98% for all
sorted populations. For detection of icTCRβ and mBcl-2 or hBcl-2, cells were
stained with Fixable Blue Viability dye (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 30’ at
4°C, followed by antibodies specific for Lin markers, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD25, CD71
and CD98 prior to fixing, permeabilizing (Cytofix/Cytoperm kit, BD biosciences) and
staining with antibodies specific for TCRβ (H57–597), mBcl-2 (3F11) or
hBcl-2 (6C8) according to manufacturer’s protocols (BD Biosciences).Fluorochrome or biotin-conjugated antibodies specific for the following murine
markers were used: IL7R (A7R34), CD19 (ID3), CD3 (145-2C11), CD4 (RM4–5), CD8a
(53–6.7), CD45.1 (A20), CD45.2 (104), CD25 (7D4), TCRβ (H57–597),
CD11b (M1/70), Gr-1 (RB6–8C5), Ly76 (Ter119), NK1.1 (PK136), CD11c (HL3), CD24
(M1/69), CD44 (IM781), CD27 (LG.3A10), CD71 (C2), CD98 (RL388) and CD117 (2B8).
Antibody-fluorochrome conjugates and Avidin second-stage reagents were purchased from
Pharmingen–BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA) or eBiosciences (San Diego, CA), and
used at predetermined optimal concentrations. Statistical significance for all population
comparisons was calculated using unpaired two-tailed T-tests. FMO controls included all
antibodies except the one displayed on the x-axis in each Figure.To assess thymocyte proliferation in vivo, 4 to 6-week-old
Il7r−/−,
Il7r−/−
BCL2mice and age-matched Il7r+/+ mice were
injected twice with 1 mg BrdU (intra-peritoneally), 1h apart. Thymocytes were isolated 2,
24 or 48h after the first injection. BrdU incorporation was assessed after Fixable Blue
staining using the BrdU Flow Kit (BD Biosciences) as per manufacturer’s
instructions.
pSTAT5 Staining
For ex vivo experiments, thymocyte suspensions were prepared in
serum-free, phenol-free RPMI (Wisent Inc.), stained with Fixable Blue for 30’ at
37°C and immediately fixed using BD Cytofix buffer, and then permeabilized using
Phosphoflow BD Perm III buffer prior to staining with anti-pSTAT5(Y694) conjugated to
Alexa647 and other antibodies. For detection of pSTAT5 after in vitro
IL-7 stimulation, WT thymocytes were cultured with media or 10 ng/ml mIL-7 for
20’, stained with Fixable Blue for 30’ at 37°C, then fixed and
permeablized as described above prior to staining with anti-pSTAT5(Y694).
Cell culture
Sorted thymocytes were seeded into 24-well plates containing 1 ml
Iscove’s media supplemented with 20% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml),
streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and IL7 (10 ng/ml), and were incubated at 37° C
in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 for the amount of time indicated in each
Figure legend. To assess thymocyte proliferation in vitro, WT DN4
thymocytes were sorted and labeled with CFSE as described[23] prior to culture (5,000/well) in media alone or with 10
ng/ml of IL7 without stromal cells, or on 80% confluent monolayers of OP9-DL4
cells together with increasing doses of IL7: 0, 0.05, 0.5 and 5 ng/ml. After
15–40h (no stroma) or 48h (OP9-DL4), cells were stained with propidium iodide,
followed by antibodies specific for CD4 and CD8, and CFSE levels and viable cell numbers
were assessed by flow cytometry.To assess the impact of Bcl6 deletion effect on DN4 survival
in vitro, Ter119− CD19−
Gr1− CD117+ cells from
Bcl6−/− and
Bcl6+/+ fetal liver (15.5 dpc) were sorted and co-cultured
(1,000/well) with OP9-DL4 cells and IL7 and Flt3 ligand as described[23], to induce their differentiation into
T-lineage precursors. After 9 days, DN4 cells (Lin− CD45.2+
CD4− CD8− CD44−
CD25− CD27hi) were sorted and re-cultured (3,000/well) on
OP9-DL4 cells in media alone or with IL7 (10 ng/ml). After 2 days, CD4 vs CD8 expression
and recovery of viable icTCRβ+ DN cells was quantified using flow
cytometry.
Gene expression profiling
DN3a, DN3b and DN4 thymocytes were sorted from
Il7r+/+ mice (4 independent sorts), rested for 1h at
37° C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2, and then left untreated or
stimulated with IL-7 (10 ng/ml, Stem Cell Technologies) for 3h before isolating total
cellular RNA using the RNeasy isolation kit (Qiagen). Quality control and quantitation was
done on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent). Genome-wide expression profiling was carried out
using Illumina mouse Ref8 v2 beadchips according to standard protocols at The Centre for
Applied Genomics (TCAG, www.tcag.ca) core facility at the Hospital for Sick Children. Data
processing and other statistical analyses were performed using R Bio-conductor 2.13.0. Raw
signals from 25697 probes were pre-processed to perform background subtraction, quantile
normalization and log2 transformation before using moderated t-tests
within Bioconductor package Limma (Linear Models for Microarray Data). Empirical Bayes
smoothing was applied to the standard errors. Paired t-tests were used to
identify IL-7-induced changes in gene expression in each subset and the false discovery
rate (FDR) was estimated using the Benjamini-Hochberg method to correct for multiple
testing. Pearson correlations showed that technical replicates showed very high
correlations between chips. For genes that were represented by multiple probesets on the
array, we selected the ones with the highest ANOVA F-statistics (lowest FDR-adjusted
q-value).
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
Gene lists were ranked using the Limma moderated t-statistic, a value that
reflects the magnitude of differential expression (based on mean expression value) as well
as the variance of that gene’s expression within each group. Parameters were set
to 2000 gene-set permutations and gene-set sizes between 15 and 500 (www.broadinstitute.org). Gene-sets were obtained from KEGG, MsigDB-c2, NCI,
Biocarta, IOB, Netpath, HumanCyc, Reactome and the Gene Ontology (GO) databases.
Enrichment maps depicting relationships between significantly enriched gene-sets (nominal
p<0.01, overlap coefficient=0.5) were generated using the
Enrichment Plugin module (v1.2) of Cytoscape 2.8.1[45].
qRT-PCR
mRNA from sorted thymocytes was isolated with the RNeasy Plus Micro kit (Qiagen)
and reverse-transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life
Technologies). The abundance of Cd45, Bcl6, Rag1 and
Rag2 cDNA in each sample was determined with Power SYBR Green (Life
Technologies). Primers used were: CD45 forward,
5’-AAGTCTCTACGCAAAGCACGG-3’, CD45 reverse,
5’-GATAGATGCTGGCGATGATGTC-3’, Bcl6 forward,
5’-CTGCAGATGGAGCATGTTGT-3’, Bcl6 reverse,
5’-GCCATTTCTGCTTCACTGG-3’, Rag1 forward, 5’-
CTGTGGCATCGAGTGTTAACA-3’, Rag1 reverse,
5’-GCTCAGGGTAGACGGCAAG-3’, Rag2 forward,
5’-TGCCAAAATAAGAAAGAGTATTTCAC-3’, Rag2 reverse,
5’- GGGACATTTTTGATTGTGAATAGG-3’. The number of Bcl6, Rag1
and Rag2 templates was divided by the number of Cd45
templates (mean of triplicate measurements) to obtain normalized expression values for
each gene.
Tcra recombination
Genomic DNA was isolated from sorted thymocytes by standard procedures.
Rearranged DNA was quantified by real-time PCR using a QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR kit
(Qiagen). All PCR reactions were run in duplicate using the following amplification
program: 95°C for 5m, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10s and
62°C for 30s. Samples were normalized to signals for B2m. Primers
used for Tcra rearrangement analysis were published elsewhere[46, 47, 48], except for Traj30:
GGGAGAACATGAAGATGTGTCC.
Western blotting
Protein extracts were prepared from sorted thymocytes in modified
radioimmuno-precipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [50 mM tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 1% NP-40,
0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA] with protease inhibitor (Roche)
and separated by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred
onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, which were cut into two parts at the level of
the 50kDa marker before Western blotting overnight using standard techniques. The upper
membrane was probed with rabbit anti-Rag2 antibody (EPRAGR239, Abcam) and the lower
membrane was probed with rabbit anti-β-actin antibody (13E5, Cell Signaling). Both
membranes were then probed with horseradishperoxidase–conjugated anti-rabbit IgG
(7074, Cell Signaling) for 2 hours. Detection was performed with ECL reagents (GE
Healthcare) and digitally measured using ChemiDoc MP (BioRad).
Statistical methods
Data were analyzed with a two-tailed Student T-test to compare means of 2
groups, and one-way ANOVA with Newman-Keuls post hoc T-test to compare means of 2 groups
in experiments with 3 or more groups. P values of less than 0.05 were
considered statistically significant. No randomization of mice or
‘blinding’ of researchers to sample identity was used during the analyses.
Sample sizes were not predetermined on the basis of expected effect size, but rough
estimations were made on the basis of pilot experiments and measurements. No data
exclusion was applied.
Authors: Han-Yu Shih; Jiyoti Verma-Gaur; Ali Torkamani; Ann J Feeney; Niels Galjart; Michael S Krangel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Beatriz del Blanco; Alberto García-Mariscal; David L Wiest; Cristina Hernández-Munain Journal: J Immunol Date: 2012-02-22 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Vlad C Seitan; Bingtao Hao; Kikuë Tachibana-Konwalski; Thais Lavagnolli; Hegias Mira-Bontenbal; Karen E Brown; Grace Teng; Tom Carroll; Anna Terry; Katie Horan; Hendrik Marks; David J Adams; David G Schatz; Luis Aragon; Amanda G Fisher; Michael S Krangel; Kim Nasmyth; Matthias Merkenschlager Journal: Nature Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Malay Mandal; Sarah E Powers; Mark Maienschein-Cline; Elizabeth T Bartom; Keith M Hamel; Barbara L Kee; Aaron R Dinner; Marcus R Clark Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2011-10-30 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Linda V Sinclair; Julia Rolf; Elizabeth Emslie; Yun-Bo Shi; Peter M Taylor; Doreen A Cantrell Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Adam W Plumb; Abdalla Sheikh; Douglas A Carlow; Daniel T Patton; Hermann J Ziltener; Ninan Abraham Journal: Immunol Cell Biol Date: 2017-08-16 Impact factor: 5.126
Authors: Melissa A Galati; Karl P Hodel; Zachary F Pursell; Uri Tabori; Miki S Gams; Sumedha Sudhaman; Taylor Bridge; Walter J Zahurancik; Nathan A Ungerleider; Vivian S Park; Ayse B Ercan; Lazar Joksimovic; Iram Siddiqui; Robert Siddaway; Melissa Edwards; Richard de Borja; Dana Elshaer; Jiil Chung; Victoria J Forster; Nuno M Nunes; Melyssa Aronson; Xia Wang; Jagadeesh Ramdas; Andrea Seeley; Tomasz Sarosiek; Gavin P Dunn; Jonathan N Byrd; Oz Mordechai; Carol Durno; Alberto Martin; Adam Shlien; Eric Bouffet; Zucai Suo; James G Jackson; Cynthia E Hawkins; Cynthia J Guidos Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 12.701