Jung Hun Ohn1, Ju Hee Lee1, Eun Shil Hong1, Bo Kyung Koo2, Sang Wan Kim2, Ka Hee Yi2, Min Kyong Moon2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ; Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether patients' perceived glycemic control and self-reported diabetes self-care correlated with their actual glycemic control. METHODS: A survey was administered among patients with diabetes mellitus at an outpatient clinic with structured self-report questionnaires regarding perceived glycemic control and diabetes self-management. Actual glycemic control was defined as a change in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) since the last clinic visit. RESULTS: Patients who perceived their glycemic control as "improved" actually showed a mild but significant decrease in the mean A1C (-0.1%, P=0.02), and those who perceived glycemic control as "aggravated" had a significant increase in the mean FPG (10.5 mg/dL or 0.59 mmol/L, P=0.04) compared to the "stationary" group. However, one-half of patients falsely predicted their actual glycemic control status. Subjective assessment of diabetes self-care efforts, such as adherence to a diet regimen or physical activity, correlated positively with perceived glycemic control but showed no association with actual glycemic control. CONCLUSION: Patients should be encouraged to assess and monitor diabetes self-care more objectively to motivate behavioral modifications and improve their actual glycemic control.
BACKGROUND: We investigated whether patients' perceived glycemic control and self-reported diabetes self-care correlated with their actual glycemic control. METHODS: A survey was administered among patients with diabetes mellitus at an outpatient clinic with structured self-report questionnaires regarding perceived glycemic control and diabetes self-management. Actual glycemic control was defined as a change in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) since the last clinic visit. RESULTS:Patients who perceived their glycemic control as "improved" actually showed a mild but significant decrease in the mean A1C (-0.1%, P=0.02), and those who perceived glycemic control as "aggravated" had a significant increase in the mean FPG (10.5 mg/dL or 0.59 mmol/L, P=0.04) compared to the "stationary" group. However, one-half of patients falsely predicted their actual glycemic control status. Subjective assessment of diabetes self-care efforts, such as adherence to a diet regimen or physical activity, correlated positively with perceived glycemic control but showed no association with actual glycemic control. CONCLUSION:Patients should be encouraged to assess and monitor diabetes self-care more objectively to motivate behavioral modifications and improve their actual glycemic control.
Entities:
Keywords:
Actual glycemic control; Diabetes self-care; Perceived glycemic control
Authors: Valmi D Sousa; Jaclene A Zauszniewski; Carol M Musil; Patricia J Price Lea; Schenita A Davis Journal: Res Theory Nurs Pract Date: 2005 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Susan Furber; Claire Monger; Lisa Franco; Darren Mayne; Lauren A Jones; Rachel Laws; Louise Waters Journal: Health Promot J Austr Date: 2008-12
Authors: M J Davies; S Heller; T C Skinner; M J Campbell; M E Carey; S Cradock; H M Dallosso; H Daly; Y Doherty; S Eaton; C Fox; L Oliver; K Rantell; G Rayman; K Khunti Journal: BMJ Date: 2008-02-14
Authors: Charlene C Quinn; Michelle D Shardell; Michael L Terrin; Erik A Barr; Shoshana H Ballew; Ann L Gruber-Baldini Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 19.112