Justin M Guagliano1, Chris Lonsdale2, Gregory S Kolt3, Richard R Rosenkranz4, Emma S George3. 1. School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: j.guagliano@uws.edu.au. 2. Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia. 3. School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 4. School of Science and Health, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Human Nutrition, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term efficacy of coach education on basketball players' physical activity (PA) intensity during practices. Intervention effects on players' motivation were also investigated. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This study took place over the course of a 5-day organized youth sport (OYS) basketball program in 2 sports centres in Greater Western Sydney, Australia (September, 2013). A convenience sample of 76 players and 8 coaches were recruited. Players were girls aged 9 to 12 years. Following the first 2 days of the basketball program, coaches allocated into the intervention condition attended 2 coach education sessions where strategies to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and decrease inactivity were discussed. Each coach education session lasted approximately 2h. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, players in the intervention group spent a significantly higher proportion of practice time in MVPA (mean difference [MD]=14.6%; standard error [SE]=2.2%), vigorous PA (VPA; MD=12.6%; SE=1.9%), moderate PA (MD=2.0%; SE=0.5%) and a significantly lower proportion of practice time inactive (MD=-14.5%; SE=2.3%) from baseline to follow-up. There were no significant changes in motivation from baseline to follow-up in either group. CONCLUSIONS:Brief coach education sessions can increase MVPA and decrease inactivity without deleterious effects on players' motivation. Also, substantial increases in VPA were found, which is an important finding because VPA has been associated with health benefits, over and above benefits accrued from lower-intensity activity.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short-term efficacy of coach education on basketball players' physical activity (PA) intensity during practices. Intervention effects on players' motivation were also investigated. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: This study took place over the course of a 5-day organized youth sport (OYS) basketball program in 2 sports centres in Greater Western Sydney, Australia (September, 2013). A convenience sample of 76 players and 8 coaches were recruited. Players were girls aged 9 to 12 years. Following the first 2 days of the basketball program, coaches allocated into the intervention condition attended 2 coach education sessions where strategies to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and decrease inactivity were discussed. Each coach education session lasted approximately 2h. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, players in the intervention group spent a significantly higher proportion of practice time in MVPA (mean difference [MD]=14.6%; standard error [SE]=2.2%), vigorous PA (VPA; MD=12.6%; SE=1.9%), moderate PA (MD=2.0%; SE=0.5%) and a significantly lower proportion of practice time inactive (MD=-14.5%; SE=2.3%) from baseline to follow-up. There were no significant changes in motivation from baseline to follow-up in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Brief coach education sessions can increase MVPA and decrease inactivity without deleterious effects on players' motivation. Also, substantial increases in VPA were found, which is an important finding because VPA has been associated with health benefits, over and above benefits accrued from lower-intensity activity.
Authors: Michael W Beets; Anthony Okely; R Glenn Weaver; Collin Webster; David Lubans; Tim Brusseau; Russ Carson; Dylan P Cliff Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Chris Lonsdale; Taren Sanders; Kristen E Cohen; Philip Parker; Michael Noetel; Tim Hartwig; Diego Vasconcellos; Morwenna Kirwan; Philip Morgan; Jo Salmon; Marj Moodie; Heather McKay; Andrew Bennie; Ron Plotnikoff; Renata L Cinelli; David Greene; Louisa R Peralta; Dylan P Cliff; Gregory S Kolt; Jennifer M Gore; Lan Gao; David R Lubans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David R Lubans; Chris Lonsdale; Kristen Cohen; Narelle Eather; Mark R Beauchamp; Philip J Morgan; Benjamin D Sylvester; Jordan J Smith Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Chelsey R Schlechter; Justin M Guagliano; Richard R Rosenkranz; George A Milliken; David A Dzewaltowski Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rafael M Tassitano; R Glenn Weaver; Maria Cecília M Tenório; Keith Brazendale; Michael W Beets Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Troy Carlton; Thomas L McKenzie; Jason N Bocarro; Michael Edwards; Jonathan Casper; Luis Suau; Michael A Kanters Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2021-07-09