Literature DB >> 25725816

Impaired brachial artery endothelial function in young healthy women following an acute painful stimulus.

T J King1, H Lemke, A D Green, D A Tripp, V J Poitras, B J Gurd, K E Pyke.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Impaired endothelial function has been observed during and immediately following an acutely painful stimulus. However, the extent to which this persists following pain dissipation is unclear.
PURPOSE: To determine whether painful ischemic handgrip exercise (pain task) causes impaired flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after the sensation of pain and hemodynamic responses have abated. A second purpose was to determine whether the response to pain differed with a predisposition to magnify, ruminate, and feel helpless about pain (pain catastrophizing status).
METHODS: Brachial artery FMD stimulated by reactive hyperemia was assessed via ultrasound in 18 (9 high catastrophizing) healthy, women (20 ± 1 years) before and 15 min after a 3 min pain task. The shear stress stimulus for FMD was estimated as shear rate (blood velocity/brachial artery diameter). RESULTS (MEAN ± SD): None of the variables were significantly impacted by pain catastrophizing status and are presented pooled across group. The pain task increased pain ratings [1 ± 1-6 ± 3 (0-10 scale) (p < 0.001)], mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p < 0.001) and heart rate (HR) (p < 0.001), all returning to pre-pain levels ≤2-min post-pain task (pre-pain vs. 2-min post-pain: pain rating p = 1.000; MAP p = 0.142; HR p = 0.992). The shear rate stimulus was not different between pre- and post-pain task FMD tests (p = 0.200). FMD decreased post-pain task (10.8 ± 4.6 vs. 7.0 ± 2.7 %, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that, regardless of pain catastrophizing status, painful ischemic handgrip exercise has a deleterious impact on endothelial function that persists after the pain sensation and hemodynamic responses have abated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725816     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3139-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  43 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline.

Authors:  Dick H J Thijssen; Mark A Black; Kyra E Pyke; Jaume Padilla; Greg Atkinson; Ryan A Harris; Beth Parker; Michael E Widlansky; Michael E Tschakovsky; Daniel J Green
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment.

Authors:  R Severeijns; J W Vlaeyen; M A van den Hout; W E Weber
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Acute psychological and physical stress transiently enhances brachial artery flow-mediated dilation stimulated by exercise-induced increases in shear stress.

Authors:  Ingrid C Szijgyarto; Veronica J Poitras; Brendon J Gurd; Kyra E Pyke
Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.665

4.  Fear of pain, not pain catastrophizing, predicts acute pain intensity, but neither factor predicts tolerance or blood pressure reactivity: an experimental investigation in pain-free individuals.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Erin A Dannecker; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  Variability of flow-mediated dilation measurements with repetitive reactive hyperemia.

Authors:  Ryan A Harris; Jaume Padilla; Lawrence D Rink; Janet P Wallace
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Acute systemic inflammation impairs endothelium-dependent dilatation in humans.

Authors:  A D Hingorani; J Cross; R K Kharbanda; M J Mullen; K Bhagat; M Taylor; A E Donald; M Palacios; G E Griffin; J E Deanfield; R J MacAllister; P Vallance
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The impact of baseline artery diameter on flow-mediated vasodilation: a comparison of brachial and radial artery responses to matched levels of shear stress.

Authors:  F Jazuli; K E Pyke
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 8.  Psychological aspects of pain perception.

Authors:  P A McGrath
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  D S Celermajer; K E Sorensen; V M Gooch; D J Spiegelhalter; O I Miller; I D Sullivan; J K Lloyd; J E Deanfield
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Interactions between autonomic nervous system activity and endothelial function: a model for the development of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kelly F Harris; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.