Literature DB >> 25725368

Mesenchymal stem cell allograft as a fusion adjunct in one- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a matched cohort analysis.

Steven J McAnany1, Junyoung Ahn2, Islam M Elboghdady2, Alejandro Marquez-Lara2, Nomaan Ashraf1, Branko Svovrlj1, Samuel C Overley1, Kern Singh2, Sheeraz A Qureshi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Live mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) allograft-containing allogeneic bone grafts have recently gained popularity and currently account for greater than 17% of all bone grafts and bone graft substitutes used in spinal surgery. Although the claim of cellular bone matrices containing osteogenic cells with osteoinductive properties is attractive, little is known about their clinical success when used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to report on the radiographic fusion rates in one- and two-level instrumented ACDF using an MSC. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This was a retrospective review of prospectively matched cohort of patients with radiologic assessment of fusion as the primary end point. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two matched cohorts of adult patients who underwent ACDF with MSC or standard allograft were included. OUTCOMES MEASURES: The outcome measures included radiographic and clinical evidence of healing at 1 year.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 57 patients who underwent a one- or two-level instrumented ACDF procedure between 2010 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All fusion constructs comprised an interbody allograft, an anterior plate, and Osteocel (NuVasive, San Diego, CA, USA). These patients were matched to a control group of 57 patients.
RESULTS: Of the 57 cases in both cohorts, 29 (50.9%) were single-level, and 28 (49.1%) were two-level instrumented ACDFs. There were no significant differences in patient age (p=.71), gender, comorbidity burden (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]: 1.95; 2.42, p=.71) or body mass index (p=.79). At the 1-year follow-up, 50 of 57 (87.7%) patients in the Osteocel cohort demonstrated a solid fusion compared with 54 of 57 (94.7%) in the control group (p=.19). Seven (12.3%) patients in the Osteocel cohort were reported as having a failed fusion at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first non-industry sponsored study to analyze a matched cohort assessing the 1-year arthrodesis rates associated with a nonstructural MSC allograft in one- and two-level ACDF procedures. Although not statistically significant, patients treated with MSC allografts demonstrated lower fusion rates compared with a matched non-MSC cohort.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cellular bone matrices; Mesenchymal stem cell allograft; Pseudarthrosis; Radiological assessment of fusion; Structural allograft

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725368     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

1.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

2.  Effect of Lidocaine on Viability and Gene Expression of Human Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Hai Nie; Eva Kubrova; Tao Wu; Janet M Denbeigh; Christine Hunt; Allan B Dietz; Jay Smith; Wenchun Qu; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Development of AOSpine BOnE (Bone Osteobiologics and Evidence) Classification.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; S Tim Yoon; Darrel S Brodke; Jong-Beom Park; Patrick Hsieh; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Zorica Buser
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-10-23

4.  Comparing cellular bone matrices for posterolateral spinal fusion in a rat model.

Authors:  Cliff Lin; Nianli Zhang; Erik I Waldorff; Paolo Punsalan; David Wang; Eric Semler; James T Ryaby; Jung Yoo; Brian Johnstone
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-03-15

5.  Allogenic Stem Cells in Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick C Hsieh; Zorica Buser; Andrea C Skelly; Erika D Brodt; Darrel Brodke; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Jong-Beom Park; S Tim Yoon; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 6.  Methods of Cryoprotectant Preservation: Allogeneic Cellular Bone Grafts and Potential Effects.

Authors:  W Blake Martin; Renaud Sicard; Shabnam M Namin; Timothy Ganey
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Safety and Tolerability of Stromal Vascular Fraction Combined with β-Tricalcium Phosphate in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Phase I Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Un Yong Choi; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Kwang Gi Kim; Sang Heon Lim; Young Jae Kim; Seil Sohn; Seung Hun Sheen; Chan Yeong Heo; Inbo Han
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Bone Marrow Aspirate in Spine Surgery: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Noh; Hesham Zakaria; Lara Massie; Christian T Ogasawara; Gunnar A Lee; Mokbel Chedid
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-09

9.  Predictive Factors and Rates of Fusion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Utilizing rhBMP-2 or Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Samuel C Overley; Steven J McAnany; Muhammad A Anwar; Robert K Merrill; Andrew Lovy; Javier Z Guzman; Sergey Zhadanov; Amish Doshi; Edward Rothenberg; Avani Vaishnav; Catherine Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-02-22

Review 10.  Radiological Fusion Criteria of Postoperative Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Masahito Oshina; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-02-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.