| Literature DB >> 25725230 |
Keiichiro Matsumoto1, Kenichi Fukunari2, Yuji Ikeda1, Motoaki Miyazono1, Tomoya Kishi1, Ryoko Matsumoto1, Makoto Fukuda1, Saori Uchiumi1, Mai Yoshizaki2, Yasunori Nonaka2, Akiko Kanaya2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although TINU syndrome is characterized by idiopathic TIN with bilateral anterior uveitis, few reports have provided a comprehensive summary of the features of this disorder. Previous reports have suggested that many Japanese patients had HLA-A2 and -A24 (7), but there is no evidence. CASE REPORT: A 44-year-old female was referred to our hospital due to renal dysfunction in March 2012. After admission, her symptoms improved spontaneously without medication within 2 weeks. In the outpatient clinic, she was diagnosed with idiopathic bilateral anterior uveitis in May, and her renal dysfunction relapsed in November. A renal biopsy showed diffuse TIN. We made a diagnosis of TINU syndrome because we could not explain the origin, and treated her with a systemic corticosteroid. Her renal function and ocular symptoms have been improving. The patient had HLA-A24, -B7, -DR1, -C*07: 02 and -DQB1*05: 01: 01. We collected 102 Japanese cases in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Japanese Medical Abstracts Society and compared our case with the previous cases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25725230 PMCID: PMC4347719 DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.892788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Case Rep ISSN: 1941-5923
Figure 1.The renal biopsy specimen. This panel shows a high-power image (×400) of a slide prepared from the renal biopsy specimen (Azan and Masson trichrome stain). The optical microscopic study showed almost normal glomeruli and diffuse infiltration of mononuclear cells in the interstitium. The mononuclear cells were mostly lymphocytes, with a few plasma cells. Furthermore, this panel shows that mononuclear cells were infiltrating the tubules. A low-power image (×20) revealed that fibrosis was present in 30% of the whole tissue.
The serological and genomic HLA typing.
| [ | A24/A31 | Bw54/Bw55 | Cw1/Cw3 | – | DR4/DRw6 |
| [ | A24/A31 | Bw48/Bw7 | Cw7 | – | DR4/DRw12 |
| [ | A24/A2 | Bw54/Bw61 | Cw3 | – | DRw8 |
| [ | A24/A33 | Bw52/Bw60 | Cw3 | – | DRw8 |
| [ | A11 | B54/B35 | Cw1/Cw3 | DQB1 0401 | DR4(DRB1 04051) |
| [ | – | – | – | – | DR6/DR9 |
| [ | – | – | – | – | DR4/DR6 |
| [ | A2/A11 | Bw62/Bw46 | Cw4 | – | – |
| [ | A2/A11 | B54/B35 | Cw1/Cw3 | – | DR4/DR11 |
| [ | A24/A26 | B70/B51 | Cw7 | – | DR4/DR2 |
| [ | A26/A11 | Bw61/Bw46 | Cw3 | – | – |
| [ | A2/A24 | B55/B62 | Cw1/Cw7 | – | DR12 |
| [ | A9 | Bw54 | C1 | – | DR4 |
| [ | A24/A33 | B44 | Cw3 | – | – |
| [ | A24(9)/A26(10) | B35/Bw62(15) | Cw3 | – | DRw12(5) |
| [ | A24/A26 | B7/56 | C04011/C0702 | – | B101/B104 |
| [ | A11/A24 | B54/B61 | Cw1/Cw3 | DQ1 | DR14 |
| [ | A2/A33 | B44/B61 | Cw3 | DQ13/DQ1/DQ4 | DR4 |
| [ | – | – | – | – | DR4/DR12 |
| [ | A2/A11 | Bw48/Bw54 | Cw1 | – | – |
| [ | A33 | B44/B61 | C3 | DQ1/DQ3 | DR9/DR13 |
| [ | A26 | B61/B62 | C3/C7 | DQ1/DQ3 | DR8/DR9 |
| [ | A29 | Bw52/Bw59 | Cw1 | – | – |
| [ | A2/A24 | B51/B61 | Cw10/Cw14 | – | DR4/DR14 |
| Our patient | A24 | B7 | C*07: 02/– | DQB1 05: 01: 01 | DR1 |
Number is same as references. Each report described serological or genomic HLA typing. The bar (–) was unsurveyed or undescribed articles.