Literature DB >> 25725046

Guidelines for time-to-event end point definitions in breast cancer trials: results of the DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials)†.

S Gourgou-Bourgade1, D Cameron2, P Poortmans3, B Asselain4, D Azria5, F Cardoso6, R A'Hern7, J Bliss7, J Bogaerts8, H Bonnefoi9, E Brain10, M J Cardoso6, B Chibaudel11, R Coleman12, T Cufer13, L Dal Lago14, F Dalenc15, E De Azambuja14, M Debled9, S Delaloge16, T Filleron15, J Gligorov17, M Gutowski18, W Jacot19, C Kirkove20, G MacGrogan9, S Michiels21, I Negreiros22, B V Offersen23, F Penault Llorca24, G Pruneri25, H Roche15, N S Russell26, F Schmitt27, V Servent28, B Thürlimann29, M Untch30, J A van der Hage31, G van Tienhoven32, H Wildiers33, J Yarnold34, F Bonnetain35, S Mathoulin-Pélissier36, C Bellera36, T S Dabakuyo-Yonli37.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using surrogate end points for overall survival, such as disease-free survival, is increasingly common in randomized controlled trials. However, the definitions of several of these time-to-event (TTE) end points are imprecisely which limits interpretation and cross-trial comparisons. The estimation of treatment effects may be directly affected by the definitions of end points. The DATECAN initiative (Definition for the Assessment of Time-to-event Endpoints in CANcer trials) aims to provide recommendations for definitions of TTE end points. We report guidelines for randomized cancer clinical trials (RCTs) in breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature review was carried out to identify TTE end points (primary or secondary) reported in publications of randomized trials or guidelines. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts proposed recommendations for the definitions of these end points based on a validated consensus method that formalize the degree of agreement among experts.
RESULTS: Recommended guidelines for the definitions of TTE end points commonly used in RCTs for breast cancer are provided for non-metastatic and metastatic settings.
CONCLUSION: The use of standardized definitions should facilitate comparisons of trial results and improve the quality of trial design and reporting. These guidelines could be of particular interest to those involved in the design, conducting, reporting, or assessment of RCT.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; efficacy measure; guidelines; randomized, controlled trial; time-to-event end point

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25725046     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  39 in total

1.  Trends in endpoint selection in clinical trials of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Seung Yeon Song; Heenam Seo; Gyungjin Kim; Ah Rong Kim; Eun Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Prognosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Analysis of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Sherene Loi; Damien Drubay; Sylvia Adams; Giancarlo Pruneri; Prudence A Francis; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Heikki Joensuu; Maria Vittoria Dieci; Sunil Badve; Sandra Demaria; Robert Gray; Elisabetta Munzone; Jerome Lemonnier; Christos Sotiriou; Martine J Piccart; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen; Andrea Vingiani; Kathryn Gray; Fabrice Andre; Carsten Denkert; Roberto Salgado; Stefan Michiels
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Prevention of Late Recurrence: An Increasingly Important Target for Breast Cancer Research and Control.

Authors:  Serban Negoita; Esmeralda Ramirez-Pena
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Risk evaluation of early-stage hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: a population-based study from Taiwan.

Authors:  Lei Lei; Han-Ching Chan; Tzu-Pin Lu; Skye Hung-Chun Cheng
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Guidelines for time-to-event end-point definitions in adjuvant randomised trials for patients with localised colon cancer: Results of the DATECAN initiative.

Authors:  Romain Cohen; Dewi Vernerey; Carine Bellera; Aurélia Meurisse; Julie Henriques; Xavier Paoletti; Benoît Rousseau; Steven Alberts; Thomas Aparicio; Ioannis Boukovinas; Sharlene Gill; Richard M Goldberg; Axel Grothey; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Timothy Iveson; Rachel Kerr; Roberto Labianca; Sara Lonardi; Jeffrey Meyerhardt; James Paul; Cornelis J A Punt; Leonard Saltz; Marck P Saunders; Hans-Joachim Schmoll; Manish Shah; Alberto Sobrero; Ioannis Souglakos; Julien Taieb; Atsuo Takashima; Anna Dorothea Wagner; Marc Ychou; Franck Bonnetain; Sophie Gourgou; Takayuki Yoshino; Greg Yothers; Aimery de Gramont; Qian Shi; Thierry André
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 6.  Paradigm shift in the local treatment of breast cancer: mastectomy to breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Kowsi Murugappan; Apoorva Saboo; Lu Kuo; Owen Ung
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

7.  Patient familiarity with, understanding of, and preferences for clinical trial endpoints and terminology.

Authors:  Mitchell S von Itzstein; Elda Railey; Mary L Smith; Carol B White; George W Sledge; John R Howell; Wendy Lawton; Donna M Marinucci; Nisha Unni; David E Gerber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Disease-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in patients with HER2-positive, early breast cancer in trials of adjuvant trastuzumab for up to 1 year: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Everardo D Saad; Pierre Squifflet; Tomasz Burzykowski; Emmanuel Quinaux; Suzette Delaloge; Dimitris Mavroudis; Edith Perez; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Bryan P Schneider; Dennis Slamon; Norman Wolmark; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Is Mastectomy Oncologically Safer than Breast-Conserving Treatment in Early Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Fabian Riedel; André Hennigs; Sarah Hug; Benedikt Schaefgen; Christof Sohn; Florian Schuetz; Michael Golatta; Jörg Heil
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Systemic immune reaction in axillary lymph nodes adds to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer prognostication.

Authors:  Fangfang Liu; Thomas Hardiman; Kailiang Wu; Jelmar Quist; Patrycja Gazinska; Tony Ng; Arnie Purushotham; Roberto Salgado; Xiaojing Guo; Sarah E Pinder; Anita Grigoriadis
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.