Noémie Savard1, Lucie Bédard2, Robert Allard3, David L Buckeridge3. 1. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada noemie.savard@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Direction de santé publique de l'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada Direction de santé publique de l'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Markers of illness severity are increasingly captured in emergency department (ED) electronic systems, but their value for surveillance is not known. We assessed the value of age, triage score, and disposition data from ED electronic records for predicting influenza-related hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2006 to January 2011, weekly counts of pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalizations from five Montreal hospitals were modeled using negative binomial regression. Over lead times of 0-5 weeks, we assessed the predictive ability of weekly counts of 1) total ED visits, 2) ED visits with influenza-like illness (ILI), and 3) ED visits with ILI stratified by age, triage score, or disposition. Models were adjusted for secular trends, seasonality, and autocorrelation. Model fit was assessed using Akaike information criterion, and predictive accuracy using the mean absolute scaled error (MASE). RESULTS: Predictive accuracy for P&I hospitalizations during non-pandemic years was improved when models included visits from patients ≥65 years old and visits resulting in admission/transfer/death (MASE of 0.64, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.54-0.80) compared to overall ILI visits (0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.10). During the H1N1 pandemic year, including visits from patients <18 years old, visits with high priority triage scores, or visits resulting in admission/transfer/death resulted in the best model fit. DISCUSSION: Age and disposition data improved model fit and moderately reduced the prediction error for P&I hospitalizations; triage score improved model fit only during the pandemic year. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of age and severity measures available in ED records can improve ILI surveillance algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: Markers of illness severity are increasingly captured in emergency department (ED) electronic systems, but their value for surveillance is not known. We assessed the value of age, triage score, and disposition data from ED electronic records for predicting influenza-related hospitalizations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 2006 to January 2011, weekly counts of pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalizations from five Montreal hospitals were modeled using negative binomial regression. Over lead times of 0-5 weeks, we assessed the predictive ability of weekly counts of 1) total ED visits, 2) ED visits with influenza-like illness (ILI), and 3) ED visits with ILI stratified by age, triage score, or disposition. Models were adjusted for secular trends, seasonality, and autocorrelation. Model fit was assessed using Akaike information criterion, and predictive accuracy using the mean absolute scaled error (MASE). RESULTS: Predictive accuracy for P&I hospitalizations during non-pandemic years was improved when models included visits from patients ≥65 years old and visits resulting in admission/transfer/death (MASE of 0.64, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.54-0.80) compared to overall ILI visits (0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.10). During the H1N1 pandemic year, including visits from patients <18 years old, visits with high priority triage scores, or visits resulting in admission/transfer/death resulted in the best model fit. DISCUSSION: Age and disposition data improved model fit and moderately reduced the prediction error for P&I hospitalizations; triage score improved model fit only during the pandemic year. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of age and severity measures available in ED records can improve ILI surveillance algorithms.
Authors: John M Townes; Melvin A Kohn; Karen L Southwick; Christopher A Bangs; Andrew D Zechnich; J A Magnuson; Jonathan Jui Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2004 Jul-Aug
Authors: Hong Zhou; William W Thompson; Cecile G Viboud; Corinne M Ringholz; Po-Yung Cheng; Claudia Steiner; Glen R Abedi; Larry J Anderson; Lynnette Brammer; David K Shay Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Michael Christ; Florian Grossmann; Daniela Winter; Roland Bingisser; Elke Platz Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2010-12-17 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Josep Gómez Jiménez; Michael J Murray; Robert Beveridge; Josep Pons Pons; Ester Albert Cortés; Joan B Ferrando Garrigós; Marta Borràs Ferré Journal: CJEM Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 2.410
Authors: Rodica Gilca; Gaston De Serres; Danuta Skowronski; Guy Boivin; David L Buckeridge Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Toomas Timpka; Olle Eriksson; Armin Spreco; Elin A Gursky; Magnus Strömgren; Einar Holm; Joakim Ekberg; Orjan Dahlström; Lars Valter; Henrik Eriksson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kate Zinszer; Aman D Verma; Katia Charland; Timothy F Brewer; John S Brownstein; Zhuoyu Sun; David L Buckeridge Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Helen E Hughes; Obaghe Edeghere; Sarah J O'Brien; Roberto Vivancos; Alex J Elliot Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.295