Literature DB >> 25723379

Strategies for effective feedback.

Patricia A Kritek1.   

Abstract

Provision of regular feedback to trainees on clinical performance by supervising providers is increasingly recognized as an essential component of undergraduate and graduate health sciences education; however, many individuals have not been formally trained in this pedagogical skill. At the bedside or in the clinic, effective performance feedback can be accomplished by following four key steps. Begin by setting expectations that incorporate the trainee's personal goals and external objectives. Delineate how and when you will provide feedback to the learner. Next, directly observe the trainee's performance. This can be challenging while engaged on a busy clinical service, but a focus on discrete activities or interactions (e.g., family meeting, intravascular volume assessment using bedside ultrasound, or obtaining informed consent) is helpful. The third step is to plan and prioritize the feedback session. Feedback is most effective when given in a timely fashion and delivered in a safe environment. Limit the issues addressed because learners often disengage if confronted with too many deficiencies. Finally, when delivering feedback, begin by listening to the trainee's self-evaluation and then take a balanced approach. Describe in detail what the trainee does well and discuss opportunities for improvement with emphasis on specific, modifiable behaviors. The feedback loop is completed with a plan for follow-up reassessment. Through the use of these relatively simple practices, both the trainee and teacher can have a more productive learning experience.

Keywords:  feedback; fellowship; medical education; residency; training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25723379     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201411-524FR

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  3 in total

1.  Receiving Real-Time Clinical Feedback: A Workshop and OSTE Assessment for Medical Students.

Authors:  Andrew Matthews; Matthew Hall; Jose M Parra; Margaret M Hayes; Christine P Beltran; Brittany L Ranchoff; Amy M Sullivan; Jeffrey H William
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2020-11-12

2.  Evaluating the SPIKES Model for Improving Peer-to-Peer Feedback Among Internal Medicine Residents: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Emmett A Kistler; Victor Chiappa; Yuchiao Chang; Meridale Baggett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The SAFE-T upper endoscopy tool: a web-based application for the point-of-care evaluation of gastroenterology fellow performance in upper endoscopy.

Authors:  Navin L Kumar; Guillaume Kugener; Kelly E Hathorn; Molly L Perencevich; Kunal Jajoo; John R Saltzman
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.