Sarah D Kowitt1,2, Diana Urlaub1, Laura Guzman-Corrales1, Melissa Mayer1, Juana Ballesteros2, Jonathan Graffy3, David Simmons4, Doyle M Cummings5, Edwin B Fisher1. 1. Peers for Progress, American Academy of Family Physicians Foundation, and Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Ms Kowitt, Ms Urlaub, Ms Guzman-Corrales, Ms Mayer, Dr Fisher) 2. Alivio Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (Ms Ballesteros) 3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Dr Graffy) 4. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK (Dr Simmons) 5. Departments of Family Medicine and Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina (Dr Cummings)
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how emotional support emerged in interactions between peer supporters (PSs) and adults living with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Qualitative data were analyzed from 22 semistructured interviews with PSs in 3 settings: low-income Latinos in Chicago, middle-class Caucasians in the United Kingdom, and low-income African American women in North Carolina. Emotional support was defined as expressions of empathy, trust, and caring. RESULTS: Across all sites, emotional support gradually emerged over time, was often combined with informational support, and was conveyed both implicitly (through nonverbal actions connoting emotional acceptance; eg, a walk together without discussion of problems) and explicitly (eg, by reassurance or discussion of stressors). Cross-site differences did appear regarding the strategies to address barriers to diabetes management (eg, PSs in North Carolina and Chicago reported providing support for social stressors) and the role of PSs (eg, PSs in Chicago reported providing directive support). CONCLUSIONS: Across different settings and populations, emotional support for diabetes management evolved over time, was often integrated with informational support, and emerged through both implicit and explicit strategies that addressed varied context-specific stressors.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to explore how emotional support emerged in interactions between peer supporters (PSs) and adults living with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Qualitative data were analyzed from 22 semistructured interviews with PSs in 3 settings: low-income Latinos in Chicago, middle-class Caucasians in the United Kingdom, and low-income African American women in North Carolina. Emotional support was defined as expressions of empathy, trust, and caring. RESULTS: Across all sites, emotional support gradually emerged over time, was often combined with informational support, and was conveyed both implicitly (through nonverbal actions connoting emotional acceptance; eg, a walk together without discussion of problems) and explicitly (eg, by reassurance or discussion of stressors). Cross-site differences did appear regarding the strategies to address barriers to diabetes management (eg, PSs in North Carolina and Chicago reported providing support for social stressors) and the role of PSs (eg, PSs in Chicago reported providing directive support). CONCLUSIONS: Across different settings and populations, emotional support for diabetes management evolved over time, was often integrated with informational support, and emerged through both implicit and explicit strategies that addressed varied context-specific stressors.
Authors: Edwin B Fisher; Guadalupe X Ayala; Leticia Ibarra; Andrea L Cherrington; John P Elder; Tricia S Tang; Michele Heisler; Monika M Safford; David Simmons Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Sarah D Kowitt; Katrina R Ellis; Veronica Carlisle; Nivedita L Bhushan; Kristin Z Black; Kaitlyn Brodar; Nicole M Cranley; Kia L Davis; Eugenia Eng; Michelle Y Martin; Jared McGuirt; Rebeccah L Sokol; Patrick Y Tang; Anissa I Vines; Jennifer S Walker; Edwin B Fisher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-10-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Megan Evans; Patrick Y Tang; Nivedita Bhushan; Edwin B Fisher; Dawn Dreyer Valovcin; Cherie Castellano Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Allison A Lewinski; Ruth A Anderson; Allison A Vorderstrasse; Edwin B Fisher; Wei Pan; Constance M Johnson Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Edwin B Fisher; Suzanne M Miller; Megan Evans; Samantha L Luu; Patrick Y Tang; Dawn Dreyer Valovcin; Cherie Castellano Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Jacqueline D Cotugno; Maree Ferguson; Hazel Harden; Shoni Colquist; Annabelle A Stack; Jane I Zimmerman; Anthony W Russell; Lauren E Ball; Ingrid J Hickman Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2015-11-17 Impact factor: 2.711