Literature DB >> 25722052

CRISPR/Cas9 and TALE: beyond cut and paste.

Liping Deng1, Ruotong Ren1, Jun Wu2, Keiichiro Suzuki2, Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmote2, Guang-Hui Liu1,3,4.   

Abstract

Nuclease-based genome editing has proven to be a powerful and promising tool for disease modeling and gene therapy. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas and TALE indicate that they could also be used as a targeted regulator of gene expression, as well as being utilized for illuminating specific chromosomal structures or genomic regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25722052      PMCID: PMC4348244          DOI: 10.1007/s13238-015-0137-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Cell        ISSN: 1674-800X            Impact factor:   14.870


Nuclease-based genome editing tools, including zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), transcriptional activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the recently developed CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)–Cas system, have been progressing at an unprecedented pace for gene therapy and disease modeling (Gaj et al. 2013; Pan et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014; Li et al. 2014). Recent advances have carved out new paths leading to novel applications of these genome engineering tools including visualization of specific loci of the genome and targeted regulation of gene expression. In addition to their genome-editing capabilities, TALE and Cas9 have also been harnessed for targeted regulation of gene expression. Several studies exploited TALE and Cas9’s DNA binding abilities and converted them into synthetic transcriptional factors or epigenetic modifiers to modulate gene expression. Synthetic transcription factors created by fusing TALE or catalytically dead Cas9 (dCas9) to effector domains were successfully used to gain transcriptional control of gene expression. Binding of dCas9 to DNA alone could repress transcription (CRISPRi), possibly through stalling transcription elongation. Fusing dCas9 to protein domains that can recruit repressive chromatin-modifying complexes, e.g. the KRAB domain of Kox12, can further enhance CRISPRi. To activate genes, in one study Therizols et al. (2014) fused TALE to VP64, a tetramer of the VP16 acidic transcriptional activator and used the fusion protein to ectopically activate genes normally silenced, leading to novel insights of nuclear reorganization in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Similarly, Gilbert et al. fused dCas9 to the activation domains of either VP64 or p65 to activate targeted genes (Gilbert et al. 2013). Synthetic epigenetic modifiers were created in Maeder et al.’s study (2013) by fusing a hydroxylase catalytic domain of TET1 to TALE, leading to targeted demethylation of specific promoter CpGs. Removal of the methylation from key promoter CpGs can result in enhanced transcription of endogenous genes. Tethering Tet1 hydroxylase domain to a target promoter thus constitutes a proof-of-concept in epigenetic activation of specific gene transcription. To epigenetically repress transcription of target genes, Mendenhall et al. (2013) fused TALE with the LSD1 histone demethylase which enabled targeted demethylation of enhancer-associated histone modifications thereby repressing the proximal genes. Furthermore, a recent study achieved spatiotemporal transcriptional regulation by combining TALE and a popular optogenetic approach and created a LITE (light-inducible transcriptional effectors) system (Konermann et al. 2013). The LITE system includes two parts: a customizable TALE DNA-binding domain, fused with light-sensitive cryptochrome 2 (CRY2), and transcriptional regulator-fused CIB1 (an interacting partner of CRY2). The LITE system allows for precise spatiotemporal control of genetic and epigenetic factors contributing to a variety of biological processes in vivo. Very recently, two studies further expanded the application of CRISPR/Cas9 to genome-wide interrogation of gene function through systematic transcriptional perturbation. One study by Zalatan et al. (2014) incorporated modular RNA domains into the sgRNA design and repurposed sgRNA as scaffolding molecules that encode both target and function in a single scaffold RNA (scRNA). scRNA enables simultaneous multidirectional regulation of multiple target genes. In the second study, Konermann et al. (2014) showed that following structure-guided design, a novel CRISPR–Cas9 complex could drive transcriptional activation at endogenous gene loci efficiently. Moreover, genome-wide transcriptional activation was realized with a library composed of 70,290 engineering guides targeting all coding isoforms of human RefSeq, with which they screened genes exhibiting resistance to a BRAF inhibitor upon activation. Interestingly, TALE and Cas9 have also been brought to service to visualize specific genomic loci in live cells, which provide a novel way to uncover the functional relevance between chromatin spatial organization and genome function. Traditionally fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is the method of choice to label DNA. However, FISH requires sample fixation and is incompatible for monitoring live cellular processes. Three recent studies turned TALE or Cas9 into powerful live cell imaging tools. In Miyanari et al.’s (2013), fluorescent TALE was designed to visualize major satellites in cultured mouse cells, including centromeric and telomeric elements in the genome. Moreover, the TALE-based approach exhibited high specificity allowing for distinguishing single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Ma et al. (2013) successfully labeled telomeres in human cells by fusing fluorescent protein (FP) to a TALE targeting a telomeric sequence. They also designed unique centromeric sequences specifically associated with certain chromosomes to visualize individual chromosomes in human cells. Meanwhile, since signals generated by FP-TALE positively correlated with telomere length, they could measure telomere length in human cells. Results from the above methods are consistent with those obtained by DNA-FISH, suggesting their potential in labeling specific genomic sequences with high accuracy. Therefore, TALE-based strategies hold immense promise to gain insight into the chromatin dynamics associated with different cellular physiologies by visualizing genomic DNA repetitive sequences. Importantly, an optimized CRISPR-Cas system with structure-guided sgRNA was recently employed for efficiently labeling arbitrary genomic sequences in live mammalian cells (Chen et al. 2013). It proved to be a robust method for imaging of both repetitive elements and coding genes. Although genome-scale imaging has not been implemented with a library of sgRNA, visualization of specific genomic loci paves the way for further study of dynamic organization of the human genome. The advances in targeted genome engineering technologies via CRISPR/Cas9 and TALE may lead to a revolution in cell biology research. Several considerations nevertheless should be taken into account for future applications. (1) Whether potential off-target effects can contribute to certain bias or misinterpretation in obtained results. While the current whole-genome sequencing has indicated that gene editing mediated by well-designed sgRNA and TALEN leads to minimal mutational load at global level (Hsu et al. 2013; Smith et al. 2014; Suzuki et al. 2014; Veres et al. 2014), precautions need to be taken to minimize off-targets caused by poor sgRNA and TALE design. (2) Choice of TALE vs Cas9 in specific application? From the aspect of construct size, TALE is relatively smaller than Cas9 and is easier to be delivered into cells; engineered TALE may be advantageous in site-specific transcriptional manipulation by serving as a direct transcriptional regulator or, alternatively, establishing a bridge between protein and DNA or between two genomic DNA loci without involving exogenous gRNA molecules. By contrast, while Cas9 with larger size is difficult to get into cells, it holds the potential for multiplex targeting. (3) It still remains unclear whether binding of TALE or Cas9–gRNA complex to the target sites would perturb the function of the native DNA-binding proteins and cause unwanted perturbation of cellular function. (4) Whether intra-nuclear localization, three-dimensional organization, or epigenetic modifications of target DNA element potentially affect the binding of engineered TALE and Cas9–gRNA warrants further investigations. Also how these factors contribute to unbiased interpretation of the observed results needs to be considered. Collectively, despite some current concerns for using engineered Cas9 and TALE for exploring uncharted cellular events, esp. in a physiologically relevant context, these tools undoubtedly open a new avenue to uncover novel events underlying gene expression regulation and dynamic nuclear organization of chromatin, and may greatly facilitate translation of basic studies into clinical therapies.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Find and replace: editing human genome in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Huize Pan; Weiqi Zhang; Weizhou Zhang; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 14.870

2.  Visualization of repetitive DNA sequences in human chromosomes with transcription activator-like effectors.

Authors:  Hanhui Ma; Pablo Reyes-Gutierrez; Thoru Pederson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs.

Authors:  Yusuke Miyanari; Céline Ziegler-Birling; Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; David A Scott; Joshua A Weinstein; F Ann Ran; Silvana Konermann; Vineeta Agarwala; Yinqing Li; Eli J Fine; Xuebing Wu; Ophir Shalem; Thomas J Cradick; Luciano A Marraffini; Gang Bao; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Luke A Gilbert; Matthew H Larson; Leonardo Morsut; Zairan Liu; Gloria A Brar; Sandra E Torres; Noam Stern-Ginossar; Onn Brandman; Evan H Whitehead; Jennifer A Doudna; Wendell A Lim; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds.

Authors:  Jesse G Zalatan; Michael E Lee; Ricardo Almeida; Luke A Gilbert; Evan H Whitehead; Marie La Russa; Jordan C Tsai; Jonathan S Weissman; John E Dueber; Lei S Qi; Wendell A Lim
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Locus-specific editing of histone modifications at endogenous enhancers.

Authors:  Eric M Mendenhall; Kaylyn E Williamson; Deepak Reyon; James Y Zou; Oren Ram; J Keith Joung; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system.

Authors:  Baohui Chen; Luke A Gilbert; Beth A Cimini; Joerg Schnitzbauer; Wei Zhang; Gene-Wei Li; Jason Park; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Jonathan S Weissman; Lei S Qi; Bo Huang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Optical control of mammalian endogenous transcription and epigenetic states.

Authors:  Silvana Konermann; Mark D Brigham; Alexandro Trevino; Patrick D Hsu; Matthias Heidenreich; Le Cong; Randall J Platt; David A Scott; George M Church; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Targeted DNA demethylation and activation of endogenous genes using programmable TALE-TET1 fusion proteins.

Authors:  Morgan L Maeder; James F Angstman; Marcy E Richardson; Samantha J Linder; Vincent M Cascio; Shengdar Q Tsai; Quan H Ho; Jeffry D Sander; Deepak Reyon; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Miles F Wilkinson; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  2 in total

1.  Visualization of aging-associated chromatin alterations with an engineered TALE system.

Authors:  Ruotong Ren; Liping Deng; Yanhong Xue; Keiichiro Suzuki; Weiqi Zhang; Yang Yu; Jun Wu; Liang Sun; Xiaojun Gong; Huiqin Luan; Fan Yang; Zhenyu Ju; Xiaoqing Ren; Si Wang; Hong Tang; Lingling Geng; Weizhou Zhang; Jian Li; Jie Qiao; Tao Xu; Jing Qu; Guang-Hui Liu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Engineered Cell Membrane-Derived Nanocarriers: The Enhanced Delivery System for Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Biao Yu; Xu Xue; Zhifeng Yin; Liehu Cao; Mengmeng Li; Jianping Huang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.