Literature DB >> 2572181

Topical levocabastine versus sodium cromoglycate in allergic conjunctivitis.

H Odelram1, B Björkstén, T af Klercker, M Rimås, N I Kjellman, L O Blychert.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of levocabastine, a new H1-blocking antihistamine for topical use, in comparison with sodium cromoglycate on conjunctival symptoms of birch pollinosis. The two drugs were compared in a randomized double-blind comparative study over 5 weeks in 37 children and adolescents (6-19 years of age) with birch pollen conjunctivitis. Nasal symptoms occurred in 31 of the children and were treated with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray. An oral antihistamine was offered as rescue medication for eye symptoms. Initially, the patients received placebo four times a day for a 7-day run-in period. Conjunctival symptoms were recorded daily on diary cards on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. The pollen counts indicated a short but intensive birch pollen season. There was no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups with regard to eye symptom scores before and during active treatment. However, the patients' evaluation of the efficacy of the therapy was in favour of levocabastine (P less than 0.01). Topical levocabastine, an H1-blocker, applied twice daily, seems to protect from symptoms of allergic conjunctivities as favourably as sodium cromoglycate applied four times a day. There was no difference in number or character of reported adverse reactions between the two treatment groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2572181     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1989.tb04175.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  8 in total

1.  Double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study comparing olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution with cromolyn sodium 2% and levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic preparations in children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Giorgio Ciprandi; Darell Turner; Robert D Gross
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2004-03

2.  Cost effectiveness of emedastine versus levocabastine in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in 7 European countries.

Authors:  C G Pinto; A Lafuma; F Fagnani; M J Nuijten; G Berdeaux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The antihistamines of the nineties.

Authors:  M M Janssens; P H Howarth
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Levocabastine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential as a topical antihistamine in allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis.

Authors:  K L Dechant; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Therapeutic options in ocular allergic disease.

Authors:  M Hingorani; S Lightman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Levocabastine. An update of its pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability in the topical treatment of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis.

Authors:  S Noble; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Topical treatments for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and effectiveness.

Authors:  Christopher G Owen; Anupa Shah; Katherine Henshaw; Liam Smeeth; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Levocabastine eye drops are effective and well tolerated for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis in children.

Authors:  B Wüthrich; M Gerber
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.