Literature DB >> 25721021

Children's mappings between number words and the approximate number system.

Darko Odic1, Mathieu Le Corre2, Justin Halberda3.   

Abstract

Humans can represent number either exactly--using their knowledge of exact numbers as supported by language, or approximately--using their approximate number system (ANS). Adults can map between these two systems--they can both translate from an approximate sense of the number of items in a brief visual display to a discrete number word estimate (i.e., ANS-to-Word), and can generate an approximation, for example by rapidly tapping, when provided with an exact verbal number (i.e., Word-to-ANS). Here we ask how these mappings are initially formed and whether one mapping direction may become functional before the other during development. In two experiments, we gave 2-5 year old children both an ANS-to-Word task, where they had to give a verbal number response to an approximate presentation (i.e., after seeing rapidly flashed dots, or watching rapid hand taps), and a Word-to-ANS task, where they had to generate an approximate response to a verbal number request (i.e., rapidly tapping after hearing a number word). Replicating previous results, children did not successfully generate numerically appropriate verbal responses in the ANS-to-Word task until after 4 years of age--well after they had acquired the Cardinality Principle of verbal counting. In contrast, children successfully generated numerically appropriate tapping sequences in the Word-to-ANS task before 4 years of age--well before many understood the Cardinality Principle. We further found that the accuracy of the mapping between the ANS and number words, as captured by error rates, continues to develop after this initial formation of the interface. These results suggest that the mapping between the ANS and verbal number representations is not functionally bidirectional in early development, and that the mapping direction from number representations to the ANS is established before the reverse.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquisition of number; Approximate number system; Cardinality principle; Natural numbers

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25721021     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Preschoolers and multi-digit numbers: A path to mathematics through the symbols themselves.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Richard W Prather; Kelly S Mix; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?

Authors:  Emily Szkudlarek; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 3.  The problem with percentages.

Authors:  Jennifer A Jacobs Danan; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Teasing apart the unique contributions of cognitive and affective predictors of math performance.

Authors:  Alex M Silver; Leanne Elliott; Bert Reynvoet; Delphine Sasanguie; Melissa E Libertus
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.499

5.  Eye movements reveal distinct encoding patterns for number and cumulative surface area in random dot arrays.

Authors:  Darko Odic; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The precision of mapping between number words and the approximate number system predicts children's formal math abilities.

Authors:  Melissa E Libertus; Darko Odic; Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-06-24

7.  Relating mathematical abilities to numerical skills and executive functions in informal and formal schooling.

Authors:  Peera Wongupparaj; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Acquisition of the Cardinal Principle Coincides with Improvement in Approximate Number System Acuity in Preschoolers.

Authors:  Anna Shusterman; Emily Slusser; Justin Halberda; Darko Odic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Children's Non-symbolic, Symbolic Addition and Their Mapping Capacity at 4-7 Years Old.

Authors:  Yanjun Li; Meng Zhang; Yinghe Chen; Xiaoshuang Zhu; Zhijun Deng; Shijia Yan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-17

10.  Interpreting Degree Semantics.

Authors:  Alexis Wellwood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.