Chun Shing Kwok1, Ashkan Shoamanesh2, Hannah Charlotte Copley2, Phyo Kyaw Myint2, Yoon K Loke2, Oscar R Benavente2. 1. From the Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (C.S.K.); Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK (C.S.K., P.K.M.); Department of Medicine, McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.S.); Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK (H.C.C.); Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK (Y.K.L.); and Department of Medicine, Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Stroke Program, Vancouver, Canada (O.R.B.). shingkwok@doctors.org.uk. 2. From the Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK (C.S.K.); Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK (C.S.K., P.K.M.); Department of Medicine, McMaster University/Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.S.); Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK (H.C.C.); Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK (Y.K.L.); and Department of Medicine, Brain Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver Stroke Program, Vancouver, Canada (O.R.B.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lacunar stroke accounts for ≈25% of ischemic stroke, but optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent stroke recurrence remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in secondary stroke prevention after a lacunar stroke. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials that reported risk of recurrent stroke or death with antiplatelet therapy in patients with lacunar stroke. We used random effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity with I(2). RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 42,234 participants (mean age 64.4 years, 65% male) and follow up ranging from 4 weeks to 3.5 years. Compared with placebo, any single antiplatelet agent was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence of any stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 0.62-0.97, 2 studies) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.48, 0.30-0.78, 2 studies), but not for the composite outcome of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (RR 0.89, 0.75-1.05, 2 studies). When other antiplatelet agents (ticlodipine, cilostazol, and dipyridamole) were compared with aspirin, there was no consistent reduction in stroke recurrence (RR 0.91, 0.75-1.10, 3 studies). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not confer clear benefit over monotherapy (any stroke RR 0.83, 0.68-1.00, 3 studies; ischemic stroke RR 0.80, 0.62-1.02, 3 studies; composite outcome RR 0.90, 0.80-1.02, 3 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that any of the single antiplatelet agents compared with placebo in the included trials is adequate for secondary stroke prevention after lacunar stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy should not be used for long-term stroke prevention in this stroke subtype.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Lacunar stroke accounts for ≈25% of ischemic stroke, but optimal antiplatelet regimen to prevent stroke recurrence remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of antiplatelet agents in secondary stroke prevention after a lacunar stroke. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library for randomized controlled trials that reported risk of recurrent stroke or death with antiplatelet therapy in patients with lacunar stroke. We used random effects meta-analysis and evaluated heterogeneity with I(2). RESULTS: We included 17 trials with 42,234 participants (mean age 64.4 years, 65% male) and follow up ranging from 4 weeks to 3.5 years. Compared with placebo, any single antiplatelet agent was associated with a significant reduction in recurrence of any stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.77, 0.62-0.97, 2 studies) and ischemic stroke (RR 0.48, 0.30-0.78, 2 studies), but not for the composite outcome of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death (RR 0.89, 0.75-1.05, 2 studies). When other antiplatelet agents (ticlodipine, cilostazol, and dipyridamole) were compared with aspirin, there was no consistent reduction in stroke recurrence (RR 0.91, 0.75-1.10, 3 studies). Dual antiplatelet therapy did not confer clear benefit over monotherapy (any stroke RR 0.83, 0.68-1.00, 3 studies; ischemic stroke RR 0.80, 0.62-1.02, 3 studies; composite outcome RR 0.90, 0.80-1.02, 3 studies). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that any of the single antiplatelet agents compared with placebo in the included trials is adequate for secondary stroke prevention after lacunar stroke. Dual antiplatelet therapy should not be used for long-term stroke prevention in this stroke subtype.
Authors: Rocco J Cannistraro; Mohammed Badi; Benjamin H Eidelman; Dennis W Dickson; Erik H Middlebrooks; James F Meschia Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-05-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tiarnan D Keenan; Henry E Wiley; Elvira Agrón; Mary E Aronow; William G Christen; Traci E Clemons; Emily Y Chew Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Victor J Del Brutto; Seemant Chaturvedi; Hans-Christoph Diener; Jose G Romano; Ralph L Sacco Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Joseph Kwan; Melanie Hafdi; Lorraine L W Chiang; Phyo K Myint; Li Siang Wong; Terry J Quinn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-14