Literature DB >> 25720986

Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two dental implant types: volumetric soft tissue changes at 1 year of loading.

Ignacio Sanz Martin1, Goran I Benic2, Christoph H F Hämmerle2, Daniel S Thoma2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the volumetric changes occurring from prosthesis insertion to the 1-year follow-up (FU) using one- and two-piece dental implants.
METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to receive one-piece or two-piece implants. Casts were obtained at baseline (insertion of final reconstruction) and at 1 year of loading. Finally, 33 pairs of casts (BRA = 18, STM = 15) were deemed appropriate for volumetric analysis of the peri-implant tissues. If the patients had more than one implant, one was randomly selected for analysis. Casts were scanned to obtain stereolithography (STL) files. Baseline and 1-year FU digital models were superimposed with an image analysis program. Linear and volumetric measurements were performed including (i) crown height changes (CHCs), (ii) volumetric changes, and (iii) changes in tissue thickness at three levels below the mucosal margin on the buccal side of the implants (at 1,3, and 5 mm). The Mann-Whitney U-test and the paired t-test were used to analyze the data between the two groups using the patient as the unit of analysis.
RESULTS: No significant baseline differences were observed between the one- and two-piece groups for the linear measurements. The mean CHCs in the two-piece group amounted to 0.02 mm (SD ± 0.32), whereas the one-piece group exhibited a change of -0.17 mm (±0.57). The mean volume changes (VCs) were -0.12 mm (±0.27) (two-piece group) and -0.03 mm (±0.29) (one-piece group). With regard to the changes in tissue thickness, the two-piece group presented a change of -0.15 mm (±0.20) at 1 mm, -0.06 mm (±0.20) at 3 mm, and -0.2 mm (±0.51) at 5 mm. The respective values for the one-piece group were -0.03 mm (±0.35), 0.01 mm (±0.28), and -0.01 mm (±0.51) at the three levels. None of the differences in linear measurements between baseline and the 1-year FU reached significance. Positive correlations were seen for tissue thickness changes at 1 and 3 mm for both groups (P < 0.05). Significant positive correlations were found for VCs and tissue thickness at 1 mm for the two-piece group and for VCs and tissue thickness at 1,3, and 5 mm for the one-piece group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Within the first year of loading, minimal changes occur with regard to tissue thickness, crown height, and facial volume for both implant types.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crown; dental implants; denture; fixed; humans; partial; soft tissue; volumetric analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720986     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

1.  Contour changes after guided bone regeneration of large non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a porcine-derived collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation.

Authors:  I Sanz-Martin; L Ferrantino; F Vignoletti; J Nuñez; N Baldini; M Duvina; J Alcaraz; M Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Soft tissue thickness evaluation in screw-retained crowns by the biologically oriented preparation technique (BOPT).

Authors:  Victoria Mandillo-Alonso; Rocío Cascos-Sánchez; José-Luis Antonaya-Martín; Martín Laguna-Martos
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-12-01

Review 3.  Etiology and Treatment of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Charalampos Kaddas; Eirini Papamanoli; Yiorgos A Bobetsis
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes.

Authors:  Donghao Wei; Ping Di; Jiehua Tian; Yijiao Zhao; Ye Lin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  New method of assessing the relationship between buccal bone thickness and gingival thickness.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Kim; Ji-Man Park; Sungtae Kim; Ki-Tae Koo; Yang-Jo Seol; Yong-Moo Lee; In-Chul Rhyu; Young Ku
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 6.  Survival and Success Rates of Different Shoulder Designs: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Marco Tallarico; Marco Caneva; Silvio Mario Meloni; Erta Xhanari; Yuki Omori; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2018-04-26

7.  Correlation analysis of gingival recession after orthodontic treatment in the anterior region: an evaluation of soft and hard tissues.

Authors:  Jong-Bin Lee; Soo-Jin Baek; Minji Kim; Eun-Kyoung Pang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  Contour changes of peri-implant tissues are minimal and similar for a one- and a two-piece implant system over 12 years.

Authors:  Miha Pirc; Oliver Harbeck; Vitor M Sapata; Jürg Hüsler; Ronald E Jung; Christoph H F Hämmerle; Daniel S Thoma
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Baseline selection for evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue changes: a clinical trial.

Authors:  Chaoling Zheng; Shimin Wang; Hongqiang Ye; Yunsong Liu; Wenjie Hu; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

10.  Radiological Outcomes of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Dental Implants: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saverio Cosola; Simone Marconcini; Michela Boccuzzi; Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris; Ugo Covani; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.