Literature DB >> 25720760

Adaptation and visual search in mammographic images.

Elysse Kompaniez-Dunigan1, Craig K Abbey, John M Boone, Michael A Webster.   

Abstract

Radiologists face the visually challenging task of detecting suspicious features within the complex and noisy backgrounds characteristic of medical images. We used a search task to examine whether the salience of target features in x-ray mammograms could be enhanced by prior adaptation to the spatial structure of the images. The observers were not radiologists, and thus had no diagnostic training with the images. The stimuli were randomly selected sections from normal mammograms previously classified with BIRADS Density scores of "fatty" versus "dense," corresponding to differences in the relative quantities of fat versus fibroglandular tissue. These categories reflect conspicuous differences in visual texture, with dense tissue being more likely to obscure lesion detection. The targets were simulated masses corresponding to bright Gaussian spots, superimposed by adding the luminance to the background. A single target was randomly added to each image, with contrast varied over five levels so that they varied from difficult to easy to detect. Reaction times were measured for detecting the target location, before or after adapting to a gray field or to random sequences of a different set of dense or fatty images. Observers were faster at detecting the targets in either dense or fatty images after adapting to the specific background type (dense or fatty) that they were searching within. Thus, the adaptation led to a facilitation of search performance that was selective for the background texture. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that adaptation allows observers to more effectively suppress the specific structure of the background, thereby heightening visual salience and search efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720760      PMCID: PMC4417074          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0841-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  28 in total

1.  Perceptual learning of the detection of features in X-ray images: a functional role for improvements in adults' visual sensitivity?

Authors:  P T Sowden; I R Davies; P Roling
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination.

Authors:  C W Clifford; A M Wyatt; D H Arnold; S T Smith; P Wenderoth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Cognitive psychology: rare items often missed in visual searches.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Todd S Horowitz; Naomi M Kenner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Visual scanning patterns of radiologists searching mammograms.

Authors:  E A Krupinski
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Comparison of recall and cancer detection rates for immediate versus batch interpretation of screening mammograms.

Authors:  Sujata V Ghate; Mary Scott Soo; Jay A Baker; Ruth Walsh; Edgardo I Gimenez; Eric L Rosen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The use of batch reading to improve the performance of screening mammography.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jeong Mi Park; Jason P Fine; Gale A Sisney
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Adaptation improves performance on a visual search task.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Carlyn A Patterson; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  Probing the functions of contextual modulation by adapting images rather than observers.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of radiological images.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone; Michael A Webster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.

Authors:  Nathan Witthoft; Long Sha; Jonathan Winawer; Roozbeh Kiani
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Adaptation in the visual cortex: a case for probing neuronal populations with natural stimuli.

Authors:  Michoel Snow; Ruben Coen-Cagli; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-07-27

3.  Visual adaptation and the amplitude spectra of radiological images.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez-Dunigan; Craig K Abbey; John M Boone; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-01-24

4.  Serial dependence in a simulated clinical visual search task.

Authors:  Mauro Manassi; Árni Kristjánsson; David Whitney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.