Literature DB >> 25720571

Is it possible to use transaminases for deciding on surgical or non-operative treatment for blunt liver trauma?

Bulent Koca1, Kagan Karabulut2, Gokhan Selcuk Ozbalci2, Ayfer Kamali Polat2, Ismail Alper Tarim2, Bahadir Bulent Gungor2, Kenan Erzurumlu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to research the relation of transaminase levels in blunt liver trauma (BLT) with the intensity of the trauma and the use of transaminase levels for deciding on surgical or non-operative treatment.
METHODS: In all, 44 patients with BLT diagnosed by computerized tomography (CT) were involved in this retrospective study. By testing the correlation of the transaminase levels and the grade of liver injury with receiver operator characteristics (ROC), area under the curve (AUC) was calculated; besides, the sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off values of transaminases were calculated separately for the grades. Moreover, same method was repeated for the surgically and non-operatively treated patients. Cut-off value was assessed for surgical and non-operative treatments. The efficiency of transaminases in deciding non-operative treatment was compared with that of other methods using ROC test applied on focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST), hemodynamic instability, blood replacement rate, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT).
RESULTS: It was observed that the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity increased correspondingly with the grade rise of transaminase levels in BLT. In the selection of non-operative treatment/surgery, following values have been confirmed: AUC for AST: 0.851 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 73%, cut-off value: 498 U/L), AUC for ALT: 0.880 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 81%, cut-off value: 498 U/L), AUC for replacement: 0.948 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 94%), AUC for hemodynamic instability: 0.902 (sensitivity: 86%, specificity: 94%), and AUC for FAST: 0.642 (sensitivity: 57%, specificity: 75%).
CONCLUSIONS: It was found that in BLT, transaminases can predict the injury rating with higher accuracy as the grade rises, and they outrival FAST in terms of determining the need for laparotomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt liver trauma; Non-operative treatment; Transaminases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720571     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-015-0708-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  22 in total

1.  Blunt hepatic trauma: comparison between surgical and nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Thiago Messias Zago; Bruno Monteiro Pereira; Thiago Rodrigues Araujo Calderan; Elcio Shiyoiti Hirano; Sandro Rizoli; Gustavo Pereira Fraga
Journal:  Rev Col Bras Cir       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

2.  Changing patterns in diagnostic strategies and the treatment of blunt injury to solid abdominal organs.

Authors:  Cornelis H van der Vlies; Dominique C Olthof; Menno Gaakeer; Kees J Ponsen; Otto M van Delden; J Carel Goslings
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07-27

3.  Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt liver injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of new England centers for trauma.

Authors:  Gwendolyn M van der Wilden; George C Velmahos; Timothy Emhoff; Samielle Brancato; Charles Adams; Georgios Georgakis; Lenworth Jacobs; Ronald Gross; Suresh Agarwal; Peter Burke; Adrian A Maung; Dirk C Johnson; Robert Winchell; Jonathan Gates; Walter Cholewczynski; Michael Rosenblatt; Yuchiao Chang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05

4.  Selective management of blunt hepatic injuries including nonoperative management is a safe and effective strategy.

Authors:  Ashley Britton Christmas; Ashley K Wilson; Benjamin Manning; Glen A Franklin; Frank B Miller; J David Richardson; Jorge L Rodriguez
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Management of grade III-IV blunt liver traumas: a comparative, observational study.

Authors:  L Bonariol; M Massani; E Caratozzolo; C Ruffolo; A Recordare; M Scarpa; T Stecca; L Cegolon; N Bassi
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Hepatic enzymes have a role in the diagnosis of hepatic injury after blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Ker-Kan Tan; Shieh-Ling Bang; Appasamy Vijayan; Ming-Terk Chiu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Non-operative management (NOM) of blunt hepatic trauma: 80 cases.

Authors:  Bünyami Özoğul; Abdullah Kısaoğlu; Bülent Aydınlı; Gürkan Öztürk; Atıf Bayramoğlu; Murat Sarıtemur; Ayhan Aköz; Özgür Hakan Bulut; Sabri Selçuk Atamanalp
Journal:  Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03

8.  Evaluation of liver function tests in screening for intra-abdominal injuries.

Authors:  P Sahdev; R R Garramone; R J Schwartz; S R Steelman; L M Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Long-term follow-up after non-operative management of biloma due to blunt liver injury.

Authors:  Nobuichiro Tamura; Satoshi Ishihara; Akira Kuriyama; Shigeru Watanabe; Koichiro Suzuki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Role of elevated liver transaminase levels in the diagnosis of liver injury after blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tian; Hong Liu; Xiaofang Su; Zheng Fang; Zhitao Dong; Changchun Yu; Kunlun Luo
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.447

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combination of liver enzymes, amylase and abdominal ultrasound tests have acceptable diagnostic values as an alternative test for abdominopelvic CT scan in blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Reza Mosaddegh; Samane Nabi; Sogand Daei; Fatemeh Mohammadi; Gholamreza Masoumi; Samira Vaziri; Mahdi Rezai
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2019-08-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.