Literature DB >> 22785635

Successful nonoperative management of the most severe blunt liver injuries: a multicenter study of the research consortium of new England centers for trauma.

Gwendolyn M van der Wilden1, George C Velmahos, Timothy Emhoff, Samielle Brancato, Charles Adams, Georgios Georgakis, Lenworth Jacobs, Ronald Gross, Suresh Agarwal, Peter Burke, Adrian A Maung, Dirk C Johnson, Robert Winchell, Jonathan Gates, Walter Cholewczynski, Michael Rosenblatt, Yuchiao Chang.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Grade 4 and grade 5 blunt liver injuries can be safely treated by nonoperative management (NOM).
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Eleven level I and level II trauma centers in New England. PATIENTS: Three hundred ninety-three adult patients with grade 4 or grade 5 blunt liver injury who were admitted between January 1, 2000, and January 31, 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Failure of NOM (f-NOM), defined as the need for a delayed operation.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-one patients (33.3%) were operated on immediately, typically because of hemodynamic instability. Among 262 patients (66.7%) who were offered a trial of NOM, treatment failed in 23 patients (8.8%) (attributed to the liver in 17, with recurrent liver bleeding in 7 patients and biliary peritonitis in 10 patients). Multivariate analysis identified the following 2 independent predictors of f-NOM: systolic blood pressure on admission of 100 mm Hg or less and the presence of other abdominal organ injury. Failure of NOM was observed in 23% of patients with both independent predictors and in 4% of those with neither of the 2 independent predictors. No patients in the f-NOM group experienced life-threatening events because of f-NOM, and mortality was similar between patients with successful NOM (5.4%) and patients with f-NOM (8.7%) (P = .52). Among patients with successful NOM, liver-specific complications developed in 10.0% and were managed definitively without major sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management was offered safely in two-thirds of grade 4 and grade 5 blunt liver injuries, with a 91.3% success rate. Only 6.5% of patients with NOM required a delayed operation because of liver-specific issues, and none experienced life-threatening complications because of the delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22785635     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  26 in total

1.  Is it possible to use transaminases for deciding on surgical or non-operative treatment for blunt liver trauma?

Authors:  Bulent Koca; Kagan Karabulut; Gokhan Selcuk Ozbalci; Ayfer Kamali Polat; Ismail Alper Tarim; Bahadir Bulent Gungor; Kenan Erzurumlu
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Hemostatic mechanism underlying microbubble-enhanced non-focused ultrasound in the treatment of a rabbit liver trauma model.

Authors:  Da-Wei Zhao; Meng Tian; Jian-Zheng Yang; Peng Du; Jie Bi; Xinjian Zhu; Tao Li
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2016-10-04

3.  Conservative management of abdominal injuries.

Authors:  Ahmet Okuş; Barış Sevinç; Serden Ay; Kemal Arslan; Ömer Karahan; Mehmet Ali Eryılmaz
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-12-01

4.  Preliminary Report of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy as Diagnosis and Treatment of Biliary Tract Trauma.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Cazauran; Arnaud Muller; Baptiste Hengy; Pierre-Jean Valette; Laurent Gruner; Olivier Monneuse
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Management of blunt liver injury: what is new?

Authors:  J Ward; L Alarcon; A B Peitzman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Utilization of angiography and embolization for abdominopelvic trauma: 14 years' experience at a level I trauma center.

Authors:  Bahman S Roudsari; Kevin J Psoter; Siddharth A Padia; Matthew J Kogut; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  [Approach to liver, spleen and pancreatic injuries including damage control surgery of terrorist attacks].

Authors:  G A Stavrou; M J Lipp; K J Oldhafer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Injuries in Polytrauma Patients: a Protocol only for Experienced Trauma Centers.

Authors:  Bogdan Gaspar; Ionut Negoi; Sorin Paun; Sorin Hostiuc; Roxana Ganescu; Mircea Beuran
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-06

Review 9.  Emergency ultrasound-based algorithms for diagnosing blunt abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Dirk Stengel; Grit Rademacher; Axel Ekkernkamp; Claas Güthoff; Sven Mutze
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-14

Review 10.  Outcomes and complications of angioembolization for hepatic trauma: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher S Green; Eileen M Bulger; Sharon W Kwan
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.