Literature DB >> 25720543

Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.

Trientje B Santema1, Ellie A Lenselink2, Ron Balm1, Dirk T Ubbink1.   

Abstract

Accurate classification of diabetic foot ulcers is essential for inter-clinician communication, assessment of healing tendency and determination of treatment options. The aim of this study was to assess the inter-observer agreement (IOA) of the most commonly used classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers; the Meggitt-Wagner (MW) and the University of Texas (UT) systems. In this study, 95 clinicians judged digital photographs of diabetic foot ulcers in various stages of healing. Wound depth was classified along the grades of the MW and the UT systems. IOA of the MW and UT systems was only moderate among the clinicians. This moderate agreement demonstrates that the MW and the UT systems appear not to be useful as single instrument and should always be used in combination with additional clinical information to avoid erroneous interpretations.
© 2015 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic foot ulcer; Inter-observer agreement; Meggitt-Wagner classification; University of Texas classification; Wound assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25720543      PMCID: PMC7949589          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  28 in total

1.  Are digital photographs reliable to assess donor site scars? An inter-method analysis and validity testing.

Authors:  Fleur E Brölmann; Anne M Eskes; Annekatrien L van de Kar; Chantal M van der Horst; Frank B Niessen; Robert Lindeboom; Hester Vermeulen; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  A new wound-based severity score for diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective analysis of 1,000 patients.

Authors:  Stefan Beckert; Maria Witte; Corinna Wicke; Alfred Königsrainer; Stephan Coerper
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Factors contributing to the presentation of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  R M Macfarlane; W J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  The effects of ulcer size and site, patient's age, sex and type and duration of diabetes on the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  S O Oyibo; E B Jude; I Tarawneh; H C Nguyen; D G Armstrong; L B Harkless; A J Boulton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Classification of diabetic foot wounds.

Authors:  L A Lavery; D G Armstrong; L B Harkless
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.286

6.  Comparison of four systems of classification of diabetic foot ulcers in Tanzania.

Authors:  Z G Abbas; J K Lutale; F L Game; W J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-01-19       Impact factor: 4.359

7.  Comparison of three systems of classification in predicting the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  Maria Cândida R Parisi; Denise E Zantut-Wittmann; Elizabeth J Pavin; Helymar Machado; Márcia Nery; William J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 6.664

8.  The reliability of digital imaging in the remote assessment of wounds: defining a standard.

Authors:  Robert X Murphy; Michael A Bain; Thomas E Wasser; Eric Wilson; Walter J Okunski
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  A foot risk classification system to predict diabetic amputation in Pima Indians.

Authors:  J A Mayfield; G E Reiber; R G Nelson; T Greene
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  A study of prognostic factors in Chinese patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Aiping Wang; Xinjuan Sun; Wei Wang; Kechun Jiang
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2014-03-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Zi Guo; Chun Yue; Qiang Qian; Honghui He; Zhaohui Mo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Outcome predictors for wound healing in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  Maryam Mohammad Zadeh; Hester Lingsma; Johan W van Neck; Dalibor Vasilic; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Combined Transplantation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Endothelial Colony-Forming Cells Accelerates Refractory Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing.

Authors:  Liling Zhao; Zi Guo; Ke Chen; Wenjun Yang; Xinxing Wan; Pingyu Zeng; Honghui He; Yufang Luo; Qian Xiao; Zhaohui Mo
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.443

4.  An explainable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital amputation rate of patients with diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  Puguang Xie; Yuyao Li; Bo Deng; Chenzhen Du; Shunli Rui; Wu Deng; Min Wang; Johnson Boey; David G Armstrong; Yu Ma; Wuquan Deng
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.099

5.  Mesenchymal stem cell-laden, personalized 3D scaffolds with controlled structure and fiber alignment promote diabetic wound healing.

Authors:  Shixuan Chen; Hongjun Wang; Yajuan Su; Johnson V John; Alec McCarthy; Shannon L Wong; Jingwei Xie
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 8.947

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.