Literature DB >> 18603574

Comparison of three systems of classification in predicting the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers in a Brazilian population.

Maria Cândida R Parisi1, Denise E Zantut-Wittmann, Elizabeth J Pavin, Helymar Machado, Márcia Nery, William J Jeffcoate.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare three ulcer classification systems as predictors of the outcome of diabetic foot ulcers: the Wagner, the University of Texas (UT) and the size (area, depth), sepsis, arteriopathy, denervation system (S(AD)SAD) systems in a specialist clinic in Brazil.
METHODS: Ulcer area, depth, appearance, infection and associated ischaemia and neuropathy were recorded in a consecutive series of 94 subjects. A novel score, the S(AD)SAD score, was derived from the sum of individual items of the S(AD)SAD system, and was evaluated. Follow-up was for at least 6 months. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of healing.
RESULTS: Mean age was 57.6 years; 57 (60.6%) were male. Forty-eight ulcers (51.1%) healed without surgery; 11 (12.2%) subjects underwent minor amputation. Significant differences in terms of healing were observed for depth (P=0.002), infection (P=0.006) and denervation (P=0.002) using the S(AD)SAD system, for UT grade (P=0.002) and stage (P=0.032) and for Wagner grades (P=0.002). Ulcers with an S(AD)SAD score of <or=9 (total possible 15) were 7.6 times more likely to heal than scores >or=10 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: All three systems predicted ulcer outcome. The S(AD)SAD score of ulcer severity could represent a useful addition to routine clinical practice. The association between outcome and ulcer depth confirms earlier reports. The association with infection was stronger than that reported from the centres in Europe or North America. The very strong association with neuropathy has only previously been observed in Tanzania. Studies designed to compare the outcome in different countries should adopt systems of classification, which are valid for the populations studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18603574     DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  11 in total

1.  Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.

Authors:  Trientje B Santema; Ellie A Lenselink; Ron Balm; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic foot wounds: has hope hurdled hype?

Authors:  Benjamin A Lipsky; Anthony R Berendt
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The role of nerve growth factor in the prophylaxis and treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Elisavet K Tiaka; Nikolaos Papanas; Anastassios C Manolakis; Efstratios Maltezos
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2011-09-03

4.  Diabetic foot screening: study of a 3000 times cheaper instrument.

Authors:  Maria Candida Ribeiro Parisi; Daniel Giannella; Tulio Diniz Fernandes; Karla Freire Rezende; Marcia Nery
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  The effect of topical olive oil on the healing of foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized clinical trial study in Iran.

Authors:  Morteza Nasiri; Sadigheh Fayazi; Simin Jahani; Leila Yazdanpanah; Mohammad Hossein Haghighizadeh
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2015-04-29

6.  Telemedicine Versus Standard Follow-Up Care for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial (DiaFOTo).

Authors:  Marjolein M Iversen; Birgitte Espehaug; Marie F Hausken; Marit Graue; Truls Østbye; Svein Skeie; John G Cooper; Grethe S Tell; Bodo Erhardt Günther; Håvard Dale; Hilde Smith-Strøm; Beate-Christin H Kolltveit; Marit Kirkevold; Berit Rokne
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-07-18

Review 7.  Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Raúl Fernández-Torres; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Alberto J Pérez-Panero; Jerónimo C García-Romero; Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Associated risk factors and management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers exceeding 6 months' duration.

Authors:  Hassan Gubara Musa; Mohamed Elmakki Ahmed
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2012-10-30

9.  A Predictive Model for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Outcome: The Wound Healing Index.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Ryan S Barrett; Brett Thomson
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Clinical and surgical characteristics of infected diabetic foot ulcers in a tertiary hospital of Mexico.

Authors:  Estrella Cervantes-García; Paz María Salazar-Schettino
Journal:  Diabet Foot Ankle       Date:  2017-09-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.