Literature DB >> 19104405

Time-zero renal biopsy in living kidney transplantation: a valuable opportunity to correlate predonation clinical data with histological abnormalities.

Eduardo Mancilla1, Carmen Avila-Casado, Norma Uribe-Uribe, Luis E Morales-Buenrostro, Francisco Rodríguez, Mario Vilatoba, Bernardo Gabilondo, Salvador Aburto, Roxana M Rodríguez, Salvador Magaña, Fernando Magaña, Josefina Alberú.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Living kidney donation is increasing as a partial solution for wait-listed patients. Despite properly followed guideline criteria for donor selection, current reports identify unsuspected renal pathology at preimplantation or time-zero biopsy (T0-RBx).
METHODS: T0-RBx was evaluated for following: interstitial fibrosis (IF), tubular atrophy (TA), arteriolar hyalinosis (AH), mesangial increase (MI), and glomerulosclerosis (GS). Predonation data were demography, body weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP), serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and proteinuria.
RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen T0-RBx were analyzed. Of these 54.4% had abnormal findings, namely, IF in 29%, TA in 13%, MI in 12%, AH in 10%, and GS in 10%. Mean clinical data were as follows: age 35.4+/-10 years, weight 66.27+/-10.14 kg, BMI 25.53+/-2.99, systolic BP 115+/-9 mm Hg, diastolic BP 74+/-7 mm Hg, SCr 0.91+/-0.25 mg/dL, eGFR 96+/-16.65 mL/min, and proteinuria 70.25+/-62.8 mg/24 hr. A total of 56.7% were women. IF correlated to age (r=0.22, P=0.001) and SCr (r=0.19, P=0.005); TA to diastolic BP (r=0.15, P=0.03) and proteinuria (r=0.20, P=0.009); AH to SCr (r=0.15, P=0.02) and eGFR (r=-0.16, P=0.018); MI to BMI (r=0.13, P=0.047). Multivariate analysis failed to sustain the significant associations found on bivariate analysis, most likely due to a low event/parameter relation and sample size.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant correlation was established between T0-RBx findings and clinical predonation parameters. Whether these mild histologic findings at the time of kidney donation represent a higher risk for the remaining kidney ought to be evaluated during follow-up. In an era, when living kidney donation is increasing, we advise closer donor surveillance to modify risk factors that participate in kidney damage progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19104405     DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181906150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of kidney organ quality and prediction of outcome at time of transplantation.

Authors:  Thomas F Mueller; Kim Solez; Valeria Mas
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 2.  The implications of anatomical and functional changes of the aging kidney: with an emphasis on the glomeruli.

Authors:  Richard J Glassock; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Long-term Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors Who Had Histological Abnormalities at Donation.

Authors:  Lara M Fahmy; Allan B Massie; Abimereki D Muzaale; Serena M Bagnasco; Babak J Orandi; Jennifer L Alejo; Brian J Boyarsky; Saad K Anjum; Robert A Montgomery; Nabil N Dagher; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Detection and Clinical Patterns of Nephron Hypertrophy and Nephrosclerosis Among Apparently Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Aleksandar Denic; Mariam P Alexander; Vidhu Kaushik; Lilach O Lerman; John C Lieske; Mark D Stegall; Joseph J Larson; Walter K Kremers; Terri J Vrtiska; Harini A Chakkera; Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Distinguishing age-related from disease-related glomerulosclerosis on kidney biopsy: the Aging Kidney Anatomy study.

Authors:  Walter K Kremers; Aleksandar Denic; John C Lieske; Mariam P Alexander; Vidhu Kaushik; Hisham E Elsherbiny; Harini A Chakkera; Emilio D Poggio; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Live Donor Renal Anatomic Asymmetry and Posttransplant Renal Function.

Authors:  Bekir Tanriover; Sonalis Fernandez; Eric S Campenot; Jeffrey H Newhouse; Irina Oyfe; Prince Mohan; Burhaneddin Sandikci; Jai Radhakrishnan; Jennifer J Wexler; Maureen A Carroll; Sairah Sharif; David J Cohen; Lloyd E Ratner; Mark A Hardy
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The state of U.S. living kidney donors.

Authors:  Connie L Davis; Mathew Cooper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 8.  Structural and Functional Changes With the Aging Kidney.

Authors:  Aleksandar Denic; Richard J Glassock; Andrew D Rule
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.620

9.  Latent abnormal pathology affects long-term graft function in elder living renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  Linlin Ma; Lei Zhang; Yu Du; Zelin Xie; Yawang Tang; Jun Lin; Wen Sun; Hongbo Guo; Rumei Bi; Mengmeng Zhang; Xi Zhu; Ye Tian
Journal:  Clin Dev Immunol       Date:  2013-09-19

10.  Approach to the pretransplant evaluation of the living kidney donor.

Authors:  Mala Sachdeva; Madhu Bhaskaran; Ernesto P Molmenti; Donna Dalton; Joseph Mattana
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2011-12-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.