| Literature DB >> 25714363 |
Diana L Martin1, Rhiannon Bid2, Frank Sandi3, E Brook Goodhew1, Patrick A Massae4, Augustin Lasway5, Heiko Philippin6, William Makupa4, Sandra Molina2, Martin J Holland2, David C W Mabey2, Chris Drakeley7, Patrick J Lammie1, Anthony W Solomon2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trachoma, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct), is the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Yearly azithromycin mass drug administration (MDA) plays a central role in efforts to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem. Programmatic decision-making is currently based on the prevalence of the clinical sign "trachomatous inflammation-follicular" (TF) in children. We sought to test alternative tools for trachoma surveillance based on serology in the 12-year cohort of Kahe Mpya, Rombo District, Tanzania, where ocular chlamydial infection was eliminated with azithromycin MDA by 2005. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25714363 PMCID: PMC4340913 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Population structure of Kahe-Mpya and the study population.
|
| |
| Total population | 989 |
| Males [%] | 481 [48.6] |
| Females [%] | 508 [51.4] |
|
| |
| Total number of participants | 575 |
| Males [%] | 242 [42.1] |
| Females [%] | 333 [57.9] |
| Age range in years [median] | 0.2–87.6 [12.6] |
Age-specific prevalence of clinical signs of trachoma.
| Age (years) | TF [%] | TI [%] | TS [%] | TT [%] | CO [%] | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 1 | 3 [20] | 1 [7] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | 2 [8] | 1 [4] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
| 3 | 4 [14] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| 5 | 1 [6] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| 7 | 2 [8] | 1 [4] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 |
| 8 | 1 [9] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29 |
| 10–20 | 0 | 2[1] | 8[5] | 0 | 0 | 161 |
| 20–30 | 1 [4] | 1 [4] | 6 [25] | 1 [4] | 0 | 24 |
| 30–40 | 0 | 0 | 7 [19] | 1 [3] | 0 | 36 |
| 40–50 | 0 | 0 | 19 [61] | 0 | 0 | 31 |
| 50–60 | 0 | 1 [2] | 34 [74] | 1 [2] | 0 | 46 |
| 60–70 | 0 | 2 [6] | 19 [58] | 1 [3] | 0 | 33 |
| 70–80 | 0 | 2 [12] | 16 [94] | 2 [12] | 1 [6] | 17 |
| 80–90 | 0 | 1 [20] | 5 [100] | 0 | 1 [20] | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TF = trachomatous inflammation—follicular
TI = trachomatous inflammation—intense
TS = trachomatous scarring
TT = trachomatous trichiasis
CO = corneal opacity.
Numbers represent N for each group, numbers in parentheses represent % of individuals in each age group with the respective clinical sign.
Fig 1Antibody responses to Ct antigens 10 years after MDA cessation.
A. Age-prevalence curves for antibody responses grouped by decade. Black squares represent individuals with any antibody-positive test (to pgp3 alone, CT694 alone, or both antigens), and red squares represent responses positive to both pgp3 and CT694. B. Plots show box-and-whiskers graph (min-max) of MFI-BG against age ranges grouped by decade for antibodies against pgp3 (left) and CT694 (right). C. Plots show age against MFI-BG for children aged 1–9. Each dot represents a single individual. Note the differences in the y-axis scales for pgp3 (left) and CT694 (right). Indeterminate range is shaded. Horizontal lines indicate cutoffs for antibody positivity. Ag = antigen.
Fig 2Force of infection modelling of seroconversion rates before and after MDA.
A. Maximum likelihood fits from reversible catalytic equilibrium model for antibody responses either pgp3 or CT694 is shown. X-axis represents the time in years that each model has a change point. The y-axis is the log-likelihoods from each model where log-likelihoods are rescaled against a maximum of 0 and a log-likelihood above -2 is an approximate 95% confidence interval when the change occurred. B. A model in which SCR changed 10 years previously, to represent the time at which MDA ceased, had a better fit than the model that assumed the SCR had remained constant (likelihood ratio test X2 = 45.4 p,0.0001). The triangles represent deciles of observed seroprevalence; the solid blue line represents the predicted values based on the model with dotted lines and the 95% CI.