| Literature DB >> 25713654 |
Helena Moreira1, Betânia Passos2, Josiane Rocha3, Vivianne Reis4, André Carneiro5, Ronaldo Gabriel6.
Abstract
The object of the study was to analyze the relationship between aerobic fitness and body composition in postmenopausal women. We hypothesized that postmenopausal women that had higher adiposity had lower cardiorespiratory capacity, regardless of the characteristics of menopause. The sample included 208 women (57.57 ± 6.62 years), whose body composition and the basal metabolic rate were evaluated by octopolar bioimpedance (InBody 720) and the oxygen uptake by the modified Bruce protocol. Most of the sample showed obesity and a high visceral fat area. The visceral fat area and the basal metabolic rate explained 30% of the variation of oxygen uptake, regardless of age, time, nature or hormone therapy. The values of the latter variables were reduced in the presence of high central adiposity (-6.16 ml/kg/min) and the basal metabolic rate of less than 1238 kcal/day (-0.18 ml/kg/min). The women with oxygen uptake above 30.94 ml/kg/min showed lower values of total and central adiposity when compared with other groups. With an increase of aerobic fitness, there was a growing tendency of the average values of the soft lean mass index, with differences between the groups low-high and moderate-high. These results suggest worsening of the cardiorespiratory condition with an increase of central adiposity and a decrease of the BMR, regardless of age and menopause characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: maximal oxygen uptake; menopause; visceral adiposity
Year: 2014 PMID: 25713654 PMCID: PMC4332173 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Characteristics of the sample (n=208).
| Age (years) | 57.57±6.62 | 40.60 – 79.58 |
| Body height (cm) | 155.09 ± 5.39 | 142.00 – 170.00 |
| Body mass (kg) | 68.90±11.59 | 45.80 – 108.70 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 27.74±8.71 | 9.10 – 55.70 |
| Fat mass (%) | 39.34±6.92 | 17.90 – 53.00 |
| Visceral fat area (cm2) | 133.61±27.28 | 52.10 – 206.10 |
| Fat-free mass (kg) | 41.17±4.85 | 30.40 – 54.40 |
| Skeletal muscle mass (kg) | 22.40±2.93 | 15.80 – 30.40 |
| Skeletal muscle mass index (%) | 32.89±3.78 | 25.66 – 45.98 |
| Soft lean mass arms (kg) | 4.52±0.79 | 2.93 – 7.04 |
| Soft lean mass index of arms (%) | 6.59±0.69 | 4.75 – 9.20 |
| Soft lean mass trunk (kg) | 19.53±2.43 | 14.30 – 27.40 |
| Soft lean mass index of trunk (%) | 28.64±2.66 | 22.08 – 38.49 |
| Soft lean mass legs (kg) | 11.86±1.84 | 4.54 – 17.95 |
| Soft lean mass index of legs (%) | 17.41±2.34 | 4.88 – 25.03 |
| Basal metabolic rate (kcal/day) | 258.76±104.72 | 127.00 – 1545.00 |
| Maximal oxygen uptake (ml/kg/min) | 29.14±5.68 | 16.39 – 48.31 |
Influence of body composition (%FM, FFM, VFA, SMI, SLMIA, SLMIT and SLMIL) in the variation of cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max), with controlling for age, basal metabolic rate and characteristics of menopause (time, nature and hormone therapy).
| Dependent Variable | Independent Variables | β | R2 × 100 | SEE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximal oxygen uptake (ml/kg/min) | Visceral fat area (cm2) | −0.563 | 30% | 4.76 |
FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; VFA, visceral fat area; SMI, skeletal muscle mass index; SLMIA, soft lean mass index of arms SLMIT, soft lean mass index of trunk; SLMIL, soft lean mass index of legs;
p≤0.01
Comparisons between the mean values of the visceral fat area (VFA< 100 cm2 and VFA≥ 100 cm2) and basal metabolic rate (BMR< 1238 kcal/day and BMR≥ 1238 kcal/day).
| Variables | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visceral Fat Area | < 100 cm2 | 21 | 34.69±5.30 | 6.16±1.24 |
| ≥ 100 cm2 | 187 | 28.52±5.39 | ||
| Basal Metabolic Rate | < 1238 kcal/day | 103 | 29.05±5.60 | −0.18±0.79 |
| ≥ 1238 kcal/day | 105 | 29.23±5.78 |
p≤0.01
Comparison of age, body composition, characteristics of menopause and basal metabolic rate for the three groups of cardiorespiratory fitness.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60.16 ± 6.86 | 57.11 ± 6–53 | 55.44 ± 5.62 | F= 19.02 (p<0.01) | ↓ | 3.05±1.08 (p=0.02) | ||
| 4.72±1.08 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 42.39 ±6.52 | 39.95 ±6.01 | 35.67±6.52 | F= 38.33 (p<0.01) | ↓ | 6.72±1.09 (p=0.00) | ||
| 4.28±1.08 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 31.26±3.49 | 32.43 ±3.25 | 35.00± 3.64 | F= 40.35 (p<0.01) | ↑ | −3.74± 0.59 (p<0.01) | ||
| −2.57± 0,59 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 148.39 ±24.78 | 133.46 ±23.29 | 118.97 ±25.72 | F= 49.31 (p<0.01) | ↓ | 14.93±4,17 (p<0.01) | ||
| 29.42±4,19(p<0.01)14. | |||||||
| 49± 4.17 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 6.37 ± 0.61 | 6.46 ± 0.62 | 6.92 ± 0.71 | F= 24.61 (p<0.01) | ↑ | −0.55± 0.11 (p<0.01) | ||
| −0.46± 0.11 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 27.53±2.53 | 28.31±2.31 | 30.09 ±2.51 | F= 37.54 (p<0.01) | ↑ | −2.56± 0.42 (p<0.01) | ||
| −1.78± 0.42 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Soft Lean Mass Index Legs (%) | 16.46 ±2.36 | 17.28±2.12 | 18.48±2.09 | F= 29.35 (p<0.01) | ↑ | −2.02± 0.37 (p<0.01) | |
| −1.20± 0.37 (p<0.01) | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1267,88 ±12, 81 | 1244.99±11. 82 | 1263.62 ±13.10 | X2=0.84 (p=0.66) | - | --- | ||
| - | |||||||
| - | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 2.16±0.10 | 1.94±0.09 | 1.86±0.09 | X2=5.59 (p=0.06) | - | --- | ||
| - | |||||||
| - | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 1.21±0.05 | 1.24±0.05 | 1.28±0.05 | X2=0.63 (p=0.73) | - | --- | ||
| - | |||||||
| - | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| 0.52±0.06 | 0.53 ±0.06 | 0.59±0.06 | X2=0.89 (p=0.64) | - | --- | ||
| - | |||||||
| - | |||||||
Differences between groups: a LOW - MODERATE; b LOW - HIGH; c MODERATE – HIGH