| Literature DB >> 25713561 |
Dawn Cardace1, D'Arcy R Meyer-Dombard2, Kristin M Woycheese2, Carlo A Arcilla3.
Abstract
A field campaign targeting high pH, H2-, and CH4-emitting serpentinite-associated springs in the Zambales and Palawan Ophiolites of the Philippines was conducted in 2012-2013, and enabled description of several springs sourced in altered pillow basalts, gabbros, and peridotites. We combine field observations of pH, temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and oxidation-reduction potential with analyses of major ions, dissolved inorganic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and dissolved gas phases in order to model the activities of selected phases important to microbial metabolism, and to rank feasible metabolic reactions based on energy yield. We document changing geochemical inventories in these springs between sampling years, and examine how the environment supports or prevents the function of certain microbial metabolisms. In all, this geochemistry-based assessment of feasible metabolisms indicates methane cycling, hydrogen oxidation, some iron and sulfur metabolisms, and ammonia oxidation are feasible reactions in this continental site of serpentinization.Entities:
Keywords: Philippines Islands; geochemical modeling; high pH springs; microbial metabolisms; serpentinization; ultramafic
Year: 2015 PMID: 25713561 PMCID: PMC4322734 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Summary of sites of ongoing research into the geobiology of ultramafic rocks.
| Submarine seeps/vents | Lost City Hydrothermal Field (LCHF) near the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR), ~40°N | Kelley et al., |
| Rainbow and Logatchev Hydrothermal Fields | Charlou et al., | |
| Saldanha Massif | Dias and Barriga, | |
| Kairei Vent Field, Central Indian Ridge | Gallant and Von Damm, | |
| Continental springs | Northern California and Oregon (USA) | Barnes et al., |
| Coast Range Ophiolite Microbial Observatory (CROMO), Lake County, CA (USA) | Cardace et al., | |
| Del Puerto Ophiolite seeps, CA (USA) | Blank et al., | |
| The Cedars ultrabasic springs, Sonoma County, CA (USA) | Morrill et al., | |
| Oman | Barnes et al., | |
| New Caledonia | Barnes et al., | |
| Bosnia | Barnes et al., | |
| Newfoundland (Canada) | Brazelton et al., | |
| Italy | Bruni et al., | |
| Portugal | Marques et al., | |
| Costa Rica | Sanchez-Murillo et al., | |
| Norway | Okland et al., | |
| Turkey | Hosgormez et al., |
Figure 1Elevation map shows the Philippines, including Palawan, with sampling localities indicated. Inset provides larger scale view of the Western Pacific, with red box showing location of main map. Image generated using GeoMapApp (Ryan et al., 2009): Marine Geoscience Data System (MGDS; www.marine-geo.org).
Figure 2(A) Active flowstone deposit near Manleluag Spring; terraces of travertine continued into/under the lushly vegetated adjacent landscape. (B) Within Manleluag Spring area, soft new travertine deposit. (C) Along the Poon Bato River. (D) Deeply sourced spring along Poon Bato River(Site PB2), very basic, very reducing, and depositing travertine. (E) pH strip showing PB2 edge travertine surface with pH ~11. (F) Serpentinite river cobble on the approach to Poon Bato River area springs.
Figure 3Aqueous geochemistry data indicate active serpentinization impacting spring waters. (A) Eh as a function of pH. (B) Ca++ as a function of pH. (C) Cl− as a function of pH for all sites sampled in this study, with other known continental sites of serpentinization for context.
Figure 4Geochemical variability across years in the sample set, given as Stiff diagrams, for which similar shapes connote similar major ion patterns. 2012 samples are in light blue, 2013 samples are in dark blue, and sample sites correspond from left to right except for single visit locations. SI1 and MF1 sites are in Palawan and were visited once. PB3 is the most upstream in the PB series of springs and was completely destroyed by vigorous rains between sampling years. Poon Bato River data are provided for context, in gray.
Figure 5Stable isotope data for spring waters presented with the current meteoric water line for the Philippines and a suite of meteoric and andesitic waters from the region; the latter are color-coded to show that the source water (circles) are driven to the upper right via interaction with andesitic volcanism (along dashed lines) to the cluster of magmatically associated waters (triangles). Note that all of the spring data for this study cluster near/on the MWL for the region, without a significant magmatic water component.
Dissolved gas concentrations, obtained via gas-stripping of gas-rich aqueous samples.
| Zambales, 2012 | ML1 | 207.0 | 0.1 | 187.2 | 0.0 |
| ML2 | 239.1 | 0.0 | 186.8 | 1.6 | |
| ML3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| BB1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 2568.2 | |
| PB1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| PB2 | 7.2 | 0.2 | 33.5 | 359.4 | |
| PB3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| PBR | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| Palawan, 2012 | SI1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 631.6 | 57.5 |
| MF1 | – | – | – | – | |
| Zambales, 2013 | ML1 | 473.9 | 0.0 | 372.8 | 23.9 |
| ML2 | 495.5 | 0.0 | 400.0 | 6.8 | |
| ML3 | 85.4 | 0.0 | 119.8 | 120.2 | |
| BB1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2496.4 | |
| PB1 | 161.2 | 0.0 | BDL | BDL | |
| PB2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | BDL | 1755.3 | |
| PBR | – | 0.0 | – | – |
Figure 6Dissolved gas findings (reported in Table . Note that the sampled sites range from H2- and CH4-dominated (ML1 and ML2, inner green and black doughnuts) to nearly completely CO2-dominated (BB1, white doughnut).
New data for the stable isotopes of water in springs of the Zambales and Palawan Ophiolites, presented with additional regional data, related to the establishment of a local meteoric water line (Gerardo-Abaya, .
| Zambales, PB1 | −8.4 | −55.8 | This study |
| Zambales, PB2 | −8.5 | −57.2 | This study |
| Zambales, ML1 | −9.4 | −60.9 | This study |
| Zambales, ML2 | −9.3 | −60.7 | This study |
| Zambales, BB1 | −7.9 | −55.5 | This study |
| Palawan, SI1 | −7.5 | −45.6 | This study |
| Palawan, MF1 | −6.9 | −43.6 | This study |
| Quezon City, NIGS, meteoric water | −7.4 | −52.8 | This study |
| Southern Negros Geothermal Field, shallow groundwater | −7.2 | −45.0 | Gerardo-Abaya, |
| Southern Negros Geothermal Field, deep groundwater | −7.4 | −46.5 | Gerardo-Abaya, |
| Southern Negros Geothermal Field, warm springs | −7.1 | −48.0 | Gerardo-Abaya, |
| Southern Negros Geothermal Field, cold springs | −7.5 | −48.0 | Gerardo-Abaya, |
| Alto Peak, meteoric water | −7 | −44 | Giggenbach, |
| Alto Peak, most shifted andesitic water | 2.6 | −22 | Giggenbach, |
| Cagua, meteoric water | −7.5 | −50 | Giggenbach, |
| Cagua, most shifted andesitic water | 4.5 | −27 | Giggenbach, |
| Mahagnao, meteoric water | −7.5 | −50 | Giggenbach, |
| Mahagnao, most shifted andesitic water | 8 | −20 | Giggenbach, |
| Mt. Pinatubo, meteoric water | −8 | −54 | Giggenbach, |
| Mt. Pinatubo, most shifted andesitic water | 5 | −29 | Giggenbach, |
Figure 7Microbiological metabolic strategies, pitched as chemical reactions, are evaluated for Gibbs energy yield as in Amend and Shock (. Recall that spontaneous reactions have ΔG < 0. The geochemical environments considered here cause shifts in the thermodynamic feasibility of reactions. TDS were estimated from field conductivity data.
Hydrogen oxidation: H2(aq) + 0.5O2(aq) = H2O(l)
Methanogenesis: CO2(aq) + 4H2(aq) = CH4(aq) + 2H2O(l)
Sulfate reduction coupled to hydrogen oxidation: SO2−4 + 4H2(aq) +2H+ = H2S(aq) + 4H2O(l)
Methanotrophy: CH4(aq) + SO2−4 + 2H+ = HCO−3 + H2S(aq) + H2O(l)
Methane oxidation: CH4(aq) + 2O2(aq) = CO2(aq) + 2H2O(l)
Acetic acid disproportionation: acetic acid(aq) = CH4(aq) + CO2(aq)
Ferric iron reduction: H2(aq) + 2Fe3+ = 2Fe2+ + 2H+
Ferrous iron oxidation: 2Fe2+ + 0.5 O2(aq) + 2H+ = 2Fe3+ + H2O(l)
Oxidation of Fe in pyrite: 2 pyrite(s) + 7.5O2(aq) + H2O(l) = 2Fe3+ + 4SO2−4 + 2H+
Oxidation of S in pyrite: pyrite + 3.5O2(aq) + H2O(l) = Fe2+ + 2SO2− + 2H
Nitrification: NH3 + 1.5O2(aq) = H+ + NO−2 + H2O(l)
Ammonia oxidation: NH3(aq) + NO−2 + H+ = N2(aq) + 2H2O(l).
| Manleluag 1, ML1 | <2 | −12.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | −26.8 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
| Manleluag 2, ML2 | <2 | −16.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | −26.5 | – | ||||||||||||
| Manleluag 3, ML3 | – | – | <2 | −18.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | −26.8 | – | ||||||||||
| Bigbiga well, BB1 | – | 38.6 | −13.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | −26.3 | – | |||||||||||
| Poon Bato 1, PB1 | <2 | −25.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | −22.9 | – | ||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 [star pool] | 6 | −17.5 | 0.7 | 1.1 | −24.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 2, PB2[square pool] | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 [red waterfall] | – | – | – | – | – | |||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 3, PB3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.2 | −21.4 | – | |||||||
| Poon Bato Riv, PBR | – | – | – | – | – | 18.5 | −12.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | −27.8 | 1 | |||||||
| San Isidro Spr, SI1. | 3.9 | −19.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | −26.3 | – | ||||||||||||
| Mainit Falls, MF1 | 28.1 | −15.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | −26.4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Manleluag 1, ML1 | <2 | −15.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | −29.6 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
| Manleluag 2, ML2 | <2 | −10.8 | 2 | 0.1 | −25.5 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Manleluag 3, ML3 | – | – | 4.4 | −21.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | −29.1 | 0.4 | ||||||||||
| Bigbiga well, BB1 | 35.6 | −10.8 | 0.5 | 10.6 | −30.2 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 1, PB1 | 3 | −12.8 | 2 | 0.3 | −26.8 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 | 22.5 | −13.8 | 0.5 | 1.2 | −25.8 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
| Poon Bato Riv, PBR | 21.3 | −8.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | −23.6 | 0.4 |
| Manleluag 1, ML1 | bdl | 18 | bdl | 0.7 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 23 | bdl | 0.2 | 0 | 3.1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Manleluag 2, ML2 | bdl | 18.7 | bdl | 0.7 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 24.4 | bdl | 0.2 | 0 | 3.9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Manleluag 3, ML3 | bdl | 17 | bdl | 0.8 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 22.6 | bdl | 0.2 | 0.1 | 3.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Bigbiga well, BB1 | 0.7 | 4.4 | bdl | 47.3 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 100.5 | bdl | 0.5 | 0 | 1.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato 1, PB1 | bdl | 24 | bdl | 0.1 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 23.9 | bdl | 1.3 | 0 | 52.8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 [star pool] | 0.1 | 11.3 | bdl | 0.1 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 10.3 | bdl | 0.6 | 7.6 | 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato 2, PB2[square pool] | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 [red waterfall] | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato 3, PB3 | bdl | 17.9 | bdl | 0 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 15.6 | bdl | 0.8 | 0.2 | 50.2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Poon Bato Riv, PBR | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| San Isidro Spr, SI1. | bdl | 57.4 | 0.2 | 3.9 | bdl | bdl | bdl | bdl | 91.6 | bdl | 0.7 | 0 | 3.6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Mainit Falls, MF1 | 2.8 | 228.7 | 0.7 | 9.7 | bdl | bdl | bdl | 0.07 | 269.7 | 1.9 | 4.5 | 0 | 2.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Manleluag 1, ML1 | – | 17 | bdl | <5 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Manleluag 2, ML2 | – | 16.9 | bdl | 18.5 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Manleluag 3, ML3 | – | 9.8 | bdl | 19.3 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Bigbiga well, BB1 | – | <5 | bdl | 46.6 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 1, PB1 | – | 12.4 | bdl | 9.6 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Poon Bato 2, PB2 | – | 10.9 | bdl | 89.1 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – | |||||||||||||||
| Poon Bato Riv, PBR | – | 7.3 | bdl | <5 | bdl | bdl | bdl | – | – |
Environmental parameters temperature, pH, conductivity, ORP, and DO (bolded) were measured during sampling by YSI 556 multiprobe meter while field spectrophotometry tests were completed (bolded). Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) data pertain to samples collected at the same location as for other analyses. Stable isotope data for .
.