AIMS: Chronic lymphocytic B cell leukaemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic B cell lymphoma (SLL) has proven to be not a uniform entity but to consist of various disease subtypes. CLL might also pose diagnostic challenges by demonstrating an uncommon immunohistochemical profile. Recently, the role of lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) in CLL was elucidated being highly expressed and seeming to have a prognostic value. Our aim was to test the applicability of LEF1 as marker for CLL in a diagnostic setting. METHODS: We investigated LEF1 expression in lymphomas by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing several lymphoma entities (altogether 720 cases, including 61 CLL cases). We also separated CLL cases by zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70) and CD38 stainings and fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses for TP53 deletions and trisomy 12 into respective groups and correlated data with LEF1 expression. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for LEF1 as a diagnostic marker for CLL was 0.815 (95% CI 0.742 to 0.888). The relevant diagnostic cut-off value for LEF1 positivity determined by the Youden's index was 10% (specificity 92%, sensitivity 70%). The majority of CLL cases (70%) expressed LEF1. Eighteen per cent of (transformed) diffuse large B cell lymphoma cases also expressed LEF1. In most other lymphoma entities, LEF1 was negative. There was a positive correlation of LEF1 staining with ZAP70 expression (Spearman's rho: 0.438, p<0.001), but not with CD38 expression, TP53 deletions or trisomy 12. CONCLUSIONS: LEF1 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of CLL in difficult cases. It shows a high specificity (92%) and a reasonable sensitivity (70%) for this entity. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
AIMS: Chronic lymphocytic B cell leukaemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic B cell lymphoma (SLL) has proven to be not a uniform entity but to consist of various disease subtypes. CLL might also pose diagnostic challenges by demonstrating an uncommon immunohistochemical profile. Recently, the role of lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) in CLL was elucidated being highly expressed and seeming to have a prognostic value. Our aim was to test the applicability of LEF1 as marker for CLL in a diagnostic setting. METHODS: We investigated LEF1 expression in lymphomas by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays containing several lymphoma entities (altogether 720 cases, including 61 CLL cases). We also separated CLL cases by zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70) and CD38 stainings and fluorescence in situ hybridisation analyses for TP53 deletions and trisomy 12 into respective groups and correlated data with LEF1 expression. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for LEF1 as a diagnostic marker for CLL was 0.815 (95% CI 0.742 to 0.888). The relevant diagnostic cut-off value for LEF1 positivity determined by the Youden's index was 10% (specificity 92%, sensitivity 70%). The majority of CLL cases (70%) expressed LEF1. Eighteen per cent of (transformed) diffuse large B cell lymphoma cases also expressed LEF1. In most other lymphoma entities, LEF1 was negative. There was a positive correlation of LEF1 staining with ZAP70 expression (Spearman's rho: 0.438, p<0.001), but not with CD38 expression, TP53 deletions or trisomy 12. CONCLUSIONS:LEF1 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of CLL in difficult cases. It shows a high specificity (92%) and a reasonable sensitivity (70%) for this entity. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
DIAGNOSTICS; HAEMATOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING OF LEUKAEMIAS/LYMPHOMAS; LEUKAEMIA
Authors: Birgitta Sander; Leticia Quintanilla-Martinez; German Ott; Luc Xerri; Isinsu Kuzu; John K C Chan; Steven H Swerdlow; Elias Campo Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Zhihong Hu; Yi Sun; Ellen J Schlette; Guilin Tang; Shaoying Li; Jie Xu; C Cameron Yin; Ken H Young; Keyur Pravinchandra Patel; Roberto N Miranda; Maitrayee Goswami; Michael Wang; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Sa A Wang Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Xing Guo; Run Zhang; Juan Liu; Min Li; Chunhua Song; Sinisa Dovat; Jianyong Li; Zheng Ge Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hale Kıvrak; Seher Yüksel; Can Ateş; Mustafa Merter; Gülşah Kaygusuz; Muhit Özcan; Işınsu Kuzu Journal: Turk J Haematol Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 2.029