Literature DB >> 25713022

Development and validation of a melanoma risk score based on pooled data from 16 case-control studies.

John R Davies1, Yu-mei Chang2, D Timothy Bishop2, Bruce K Armstrong3, Veronique Bataille4, Wilma Bergman5, Marianne Berwick6, Paige M Bracci7, J Mark Elwood8, Marc S Ernstoff9, Adele Green10, Nelleke A Gruis5, Elizabeth A Holly7, Christian Ingvar11, Peter A Kanetsky12, Margaret R Karagas13, Tim K Lee14, Loïc Le Marchand15, Rona M Mackie16, Håkan Olsson17, Anne Østerlind18, Timothy R Rebbeck19, Kristian Reich20, Peter Sasieni21, Victor Siskind10, Anthony J Swerdlow22, Linda Titus13, Michael S Zens13, Andreas Ziegler23, Richard P Gallagher14, Jennifer H Barrett2, Julia Newton-Bishop2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report the development of a cutaneous melanoma risk algorithm based upon seven factors; hair color, skin type, family history, freckling, nevus count, number of large nevi, and history of sunburn, intended to form the basis of a self-assessment Web tool for the general public.
METHODS: Predicted odds of melanoma were estimated by analyzing a pooled dataset from 16 case-control studies using logistic random coefficients models. Risk categories were defined based on the distribution of the predicted odds in the controls from these studies. Imputation was used to estimate missing data in the pooled datasets. The 30th, 60th, and 90th centiles were used to distribute individuals into four risk groups for their age, sex, and geographic location. Cross-validation was used to test the robustness of the thresholds for each group by leaving out each study one by one. Performance of the model was assessed in an independent UK case-control study dataset.
RESULTS: Cross-validation confirmed the robustness of the threshold estimates. Cases and controls were well discriminated in the independent dataset [area under the curve, 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.73-0.78]. Twenty-nine percent of cases were in the highest risk group compared with 7% of controls, and 43% of controls were in the lowest risk group compared with 13% of cases.
CONCLUSION: We have identified a composite score representing an estimate of relative risk and successfully validated this score in an independent dataset. IMPACT: This score may be a useful tool to inform members of the public about their melanoma risk. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713022      PMCID: PMC4487528          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  39 in total

1.  Changing knowledge and attitudes about skin cancer risk factors in adolescents.

Authors:  R J Mermelstein; L A Riesenberg
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Personal risk-factor chart for cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  R M MacKie; T Freudenberger; T C Aitchison
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Benign melanocytic naevi as a risk factor for malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A J Swerdlow; J English; R M MacKie; C J O'Doherty; J A Hunter; J Clark; D J Hole
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-06-14

4.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Estimating the population attributable risk for multiple risk factors using case-control data.

Authors:  P Bruzzi; S B Green; D P Byar; L A Brinton; C Schairer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Malignant melanoma in England: risks associated with naevi, freckles, social class, hair colour, and sunburn.

Authors:  J M Elwood; S M Whitehead; J Davison; M Stewart; M Galt
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  The Danish case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV-light exposure.

Authors:  A Osterlind; M A Tucker; B J Stone; O M Jensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-09-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Cutaneous melanoma in relation to intermittent and constant sun exposure--the Western Canada Melanoma Study.

Authors:  J M Elwood; R P Gallagher; G B Hill; J C Pearson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1985-04-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Relationship of cutaneous malignant melanoma to individual sunlight-exposure habits.

Authors:  C D Holman; B K Armstrong; P J Heenan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Sunburn and malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A Green; V Siskind; C Bain; J Alexander
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Melanoma risk stratification of individuals with a high-risk naevus phenotype - A pilot study.

Authors:  Ayelet Rishpon; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Stephen W Dusza; Gila Isman; Kivanc Kose; Allan C Halpern; Michael A Marchetti
Journal:  Australas J Dermatol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.875

2.  Combining common genetic variants and non-genetic risk factors to predict risk of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Fangyi Gu; Ting-Huei Chen; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Maria Concetta Fargnoli; Donato Calista; Paola Ghiorzo; Ketty Peris; Susana Puig; Chiara Menin; Arcangela De Nicolo; Monica Rodolfo; Cristina Pellegrini; Lorenza Pastorino; Evangelos Evangelou; Tongwu Zhang; Xing Hua; Curt T DellaValle; D Timothy Bishop; Stuart MacGregor; Mark I Iles; Matthew H Law; Anne Cust; Kevin M Brown; Alexander J Stratigos; Eduardo Nagore; Stephen Chanock; Jianxin Shi; Melanoma Meta-Analysis Consortium; MelaNostrum Consortium; Maria Teresa Landi
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Genetic Associations with Indoor Tanning Addiction among non-Hispanic White Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Jaeil Ahn; Bingsong Zhang; Michael B Atkins; David Goerlitz; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-01-01

4.  Using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to Evaluate Melanoma Prediction Studies.

Authors:  Isabelle Kaiser; Sonja Mathes; Annette B Pfahlberg; Wolfgang Uter; Carola Berking; Markus V Heppt; Theresa Steeb; Katharina Diehl; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Genome-Wide Association Study Suggests the Variant rs7551288*A within the DHCR24 Gene Is Associated with Poor Overall Survival in Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Annette Pflugfelder; Xuan Ling Hilary Yong; Kasturee Jagirdar; Thomas K Eigentler; H Peter Soyer; Richard A Sturm; Lukas Flatz; David L Duffy
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Indoor Tanning Dependence in Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Darren Mays; Michael B Atkins; Jaeil Ahn; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Reporting Quality of Studies Developing and Validating Melanoma Prediction Models: An Assessment Based on the TRIPOD Statement.

Authors:  Isabelle Kaiser; Katharina Diehl; Markus V Heppt; Sonja Mathes; Annette B Pfahlberg; Theresa Steeb; Wolfgang Uter; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26

8.  Risk Prediction Models for Melanoma: A Systematic Review on the Heterogeneity in Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Isabelle Kaiser; Annette B Pfahlberg; Wolfgang Uter; Markus V Heppt; Marit B Veierød; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.