Literature DB >> 25713012

Implementation and reimbursement of remote monitoring for cardiac implantable electronic devices in Europe: a survey from the health economics committee of the European Heart Rhythm Association.

Georges H Mairesse1, Frieder Braunschweig2, Katherine Klersy3, Martin R Cowie4, Francisco Leyva5.   

Abstract

Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) permits early detection of arrhythmias, device, and lead failure and may also be useful in risk-predicting patient-related outcomes. Financial benefits for patients and healthcare organizations have also been shown. We sought to assess the implementation and funding of RM of CIEDs, including conventional pacemakers (PMs), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices in Europe. Electronic survey from 43 centres in 15 European countries. In the study sample, RM was available in 22% of PM patients, 74% of ICD patients, and 69% of CRT patients. The most significant perceived benefits were the early detection of atrial arrhythmias in pacemaker patients, lead failure in ICD patients, and worsening heart failure in CRT patients. Remote monitoring was reported to lead a reduction of in-office follow-ups for all devices. The most important reported barrier to the implementation of RM for all CIEDs was lack of reimbursement (80% of centres). Physicians regard RM of CIEDs as a clinically useful technology that affords significant benefits for patients and healthcare organizations. Remote monitoring, however, is perceived as increasing workload. Reimbursement for RM is generally perceived as a major barrier to implementation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator; Pacemaker; Remote monitoring; Telemonitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25713012     DOI: 10.1093/europace/euu390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  19 in total

1.  [Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: Is remote monitoring obligatory?].

Authors:  Fritz W Horlbeck; J O Schwab
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-22

2.  Organizational model and reactions to alerts in remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: A survey from the Home Monitoring Expert Alliance project.

Authors:  Gabriele Zanotto; Antonio D'Onofrio; Paolo Della Bella; Francesco Solimene; Ennio C Pisanò; Saverio Iacopino; Cristina Dondina; Daniele Giacopelli; Alessio Gargaro; Renato P Ricci
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Home monitoring after ambulatory implanted primary cardiac implantable electronic devices: The home ambulance pilot study.

Authors:  Mariana S Parahuleva; Nedim Soydan; Dimitar Divchev; Ulrich Lüsebrink; Bernhard Schieffer; Ali Erdogan
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  [Antibradycardia therapy : Indication and implementation].

Authors:  Peter Zartner
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-05-24

5.  Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Canada: Survey of Patients and Device Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Shannon E Kelly; Debra Campbell; Lenora J Duhn; Karen Giddens; Anne M Gillis; Amir AbdelWahab; Isabelle Nault; Satish R Raj; Evan Lockwood; Jessica Basta; Steve Doucette; George A Wells; Ratika Parkash
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and resynchronization devices to improve patient outcomes: dead end or way ahead?

Authors:  Frieder Braunschweig; Stefan D Anker; Jochen Proff; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Remote Monitoring of Chronic Diseases: A Landscape Assessment of Policies in Four European Countries.

Authors:  Katherine Rojahn; Suzanne Laplante; James Sloand; Claire Main; Aftab Ibrahim; Janet Wild; Nicky Sturt; Thelga Areteou; K Ian Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prospective evaluation of the multisensor HeartLogic algorithm for heart failure monitoring.

Authors:  Luca Santini; Antonio D'Onofrio; Antonio Dello Russo; Leonardo Calò; Domenico Pecora; Stefano Favale; Barbara Petracci; Giulio Molon; Valter Bianchi; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Fabrizio Ammirati; Carmelo La Greca; Monica Campari; Sergio Valsecchi; Alessandro Capucci
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Social, Organizational, and Technological Factors Impacting Clinicians' Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Christine Jacob; Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez; Chris Ivory
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 10.  Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Permanent Pacemakers: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.