Literature DB >> 25712212

Reprogramming of human cancer cells to pluripotency for models of cancer progression.

Jungsun Kim1, Kenneth S Zaret2.   

Abstract

The ability to study live cells as they progress through the stages of cancer provides the opportunity to discover dynamic networks underlying pathology, markers of early stages, and ways to assess therapeutics. Genetically engineered animal models of cancer, where it is possible to study the consequences of temporal-specific induction of oncogenes or deletion of tumor suppressors, have yielded major insights into cancer progression. Yet differences exist between animal and human cancers, such as in markers of progression and response to therapeutics. Thus, there is a need for human cell models of cancer progression. Most human cell models of cancer are based on tumor cell lines and xenografts of primary tumor cells that resemble the advanced tumor state, from which the cells were derived, and thus do not recapitulate disease progression. Yet a subset of cancer types have been reprogrammed to pluripotency or near-pluripotency by blastocyst injection, by somatic cell nuclear transfer and by induced pluripotent stem cell (iPS) technology. The reprogrammed cancer cells show that pluripotency can transiently dominate over the cancer phenotype. Diverse studies show that reprogrammed cancer cells can, in some cases, exhibit early-stage phenotypes reflective of only partial expression of the cancer genome. In one case, reprogrammed human pancreatic cancer cells have been shown to recapitulate stages of cancer progression, from early to late stages, thus providing a model for studying pancreatic cancer development in human cells where previously such could only be discerned from mouse models. We discuss these findings, the challenges in developing such models and their current limitations, and ways that iPS reprogramming may be enhanced to develop human cell models of cancer progression.
© 2015 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; iPS; pluripotency; progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25712212      PMCID: PMC4369311          DOI: 10.15252/embj.201490736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  74 in total

1.  Ectopic expression of Oct-4 blocks progenitor-cell differentiation and causes dysplasia in epithelial tissues.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Yasuhiro Yamada; Caroline Beard; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  SWI/SNF nucleosome remodellers and cancer.

Authors:  Boris G Wilson; Charles W M Roberts
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Essential role for oncogenic Ras in tumour maintenance.

Authors:  L Chin; A Tam; J Pomerantz; M Wong; J Holash; N Bardeesy; Q Shen; R O'Hagan; J Pantginis; H Zhou; J W Horner; C Cordon-Cardo; G D Yancopoulos; R A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development.

Authors:  John J Tentler; Aik Choon Tan; Colin D Weekes; Antonio Jimeno; Stephen Leong; Todd M Pitts; John J Arcaroli; Wells A Messersmith; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Zebrafish models for cancer.

Authors:  Shu Liu; Steven D Leach
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 23.472

6.  Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutant mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection.

Authors:  Z Q Wang; F Kiefer; P Urbánek; E F Wagner
Journal:  Mech Dev       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Mutations in the p53 gene occur in diverse human tumour types.

Authors:  J M Nigro; S J Baker; A C Preisinger; J M Jessup; R Hostetter; K Cleary; S H Bigner; N Davidson; S Baylin; P Devilee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Nuclear cloning of embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Robert H Blelloch; Konrad Hochedlinger; Yasuhiro Yamada; Cameron Brennan; Minjung Kim; Beatrice Mintz; Lynda Chin; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Proteomic and bioinformatic analysis of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes identifies extensive roles in human malignancy.

Authors:  Cigall Kadoch; Diana C Hargreaves; Courtney Hodges; Laura Elias; Lena Ho; Jeff Ranish; Gerald R Crabtree
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Terminal differentiation and loss of tumorigenicity of human cancers via pluripotency-based reprogramming.

Authors:  X Zhang; F D Cruz; M Terry; F Remotti; I Matushansky
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  31 in total

1.  Murine melanoma cells incomplete reprogramming using non-viral vector.

Authors:  D A D Câmara; A S Porcacchia; A S Costa; R A Azevedo; I Kerkis
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and precision oncology.

Authors:  Eirini P Papapetrou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 3.  Common stemness regulators of embryonic and cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Christiana Hadjimichael; Konstantina Chanoumidou; Natalia Papadopoulou; Panagiota Arampatzi; Joseph Papamatheakis; Androniki Kretsovali
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Stage-Specific Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Map the Progression of Myeloid Transformation to Transplantable Leukemia.

Authors:  Andriana G Kotini; Chan-Jung Chang; Arthur Chow; Han Yuan; Tzu-Chieh Ho; Tiansu Wang; Shailee Vora; Alexander Solovyov; Chrystel Husser; Malgorzata Olszewska; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Deepak Perumal; Virginia M Klimek; Alexandros Spyridonidis; Raajit K Rampal; Lewis Silverman; E Premkumar Reddy; Elli Papaemmanuil; Samir Parekh; Benjamin D Greenbaum; Christina S Leslie; Michael G Kharas; Eirini P Papapetrou
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  The proteasome as a druggable target with multiple therapeutic potentialities: Cutting and non-cutting edges.

Authors:  G R Tundo; D Sbardella; A M Santoro; A Coletta; F Oddone; G Grasso; D Milardi; P M Lacal; S Marini; R Purrello; G Graziani; M Coletta
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 12.310

6.  An NF-κB signature predicts low-grade glioma prognosis: a precision medicine approach based on patient-derived stem cells.

Authors:  Tamara Ius; Yari Ciani; Maria Elisabetta Ruaro; Miriam Isola; Marisa Sorrentino; Michela Bulfoni; Veronica Candotti; Cecilia Correcig; Evgenia Bourkoula; Ivana Manini; Enrico Pegolo; Damiano Mangoni; Stefania Marzinotto; Slobodanka Radovic; Barbara Toffoletto; Federica Caponnetto; Andrea Zanello; Laura Mariuzzi; Carla Di Loreto; Antonio Paolo Beltrami; Silvano Piazza; Miran Skrap; Daniela Cesselli
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  Revisiting Epithelial Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Luis Fernando Méndez-López
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 8.  Regulation of Cellular Identity in Cancer.

Authors:  Nilotpal Roy; Matthias Hebrok
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 9.  Stem cell therapies and benefaction of somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning in COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Birbal Singh; Gorakh Mal; Vinod Verma; Ruchi Tiwari; Muhammad Imran Khan; Ranjan K Mohapatra; Saikat Mitra; Salem A Alyami; Talha Bin Emran; Kuldeep Dhama; Mohammad Ali Moni
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 10.  Drug Delivery Using Nanoparticles for Cancer Stem-Like Cell Targeting.

Authors:  Bing Lu; Xiaojia Huang; Jingxin Mo; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.