BACKGROUND: Increasingly, minimally invasive procedures are performed to assess lung lesions and stage lung carcinomas. In cases of advanced-stage lung cancer, the biopsy may provide the only diagnostic tissue. The aim of this study was to determine which method-fine-needle aspiration (FNA), core biopsy (CBx), or both (B)--is optimal for providing sufficient tissue for rendering a specific diagnosis and pursuing molecular studies for guiding tumor-specific treatment. METHODS: A search was performed for computed tomography-guided lung FNA, CBx, or B cases with rapid onsite evaluation. Carcinomas were assessed for the adequacy to render a specific diagnosis; this was defined as enough refinement to subtype a primary carcinoma or to assess a metastatic origin morphologically and/or immunohistochemically. In cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma, the capability of each modality to yield sufficient tissue for molecular studies (epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS, or anaplastic lymphoma kinase) was also assessed. RESULTS: There were 210 cases, and 134 represented neoplasms, including 115 carcinomas. For carcinomas, a specific diagnosis was reached in 89% of FNA cases (33 of 37), 98% of CBx cases (43 of 44), and 100% of B cases (34 of 34). For primary lung adenocarcinomas, adequate tissue remained to perform molecular studies in 94% of FNA cases (16 of 17), 100% of CBx cases (19 of 19), and 86% of B cases (19 of 22). No statistical difference was found among the modalities for either reaching a specific diagnosis (p = .07, Fisher exact test) or providing sufficient tissue for molecular studies (p = .30, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FNA, CBx, and B are comparable for arriving at a specific diagnosis and having sufficient tissue for molecular studies: they specifically attained the diagnostic and prognostic goals of minimally invasive procedures for lung carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, minimally invasive procedures are performed to assess lung lesions and stage lung carcinomas. In cases of advanced-stage lung cancer, the biopsy may provide the only diagnostic tissue. The aim of this study was to determine which method-fine-needle aspiration (FNA), core biopsy (CBx), or both (B)--is optimal for providing sufficient tissue for rendering a specific diagnosis and pursuing molecular studies for guiding tumor-specific treatment. METHODS: A search was performed for computed tomography-guided lung FNA, CBx, or B cases with rapid onsite evaluation. Carcinomas were assessed for the adequacy to render a specific diagnosis; this was defined as enough refinement to subtype a primary carcinoma or to assess a metastatic origin morphologically and/or immunohistochemically. In cases of primary lung adenocarcinoma, the capability of each modality to yield sufficient tissue for molecular studies (epidermal growth factor receptor, KRAS, or anaplastic lymphoma kinase) was also assessed. RESULTS: There were 210 cases, and 134 represented neoplasms, including 115 carcinomas. For carcinomas, a specific diagnosis was reached in 89% of FNA cases (33 of 37), 98% of CBx cases (43 of 44), and 100% of B cases (34 of 34). For primary lung adenocarcinomas, adequate tissue remained to perform molecular studies in 94% of FNA cases (16 of 17), 100% of CBx cases (19 of 19), and 86% of B cases (19 of 22). No statistical difference was found among the modalities for either reaching a specific diagnosis (p = .07, Fisher exact test) or providing sufficient tissue for molecular studies (p = .30, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that FNA, CBx, and B are comparable for arriving at a specific diagnosis and having sufficient tissue for molecular studies: they specifically attained the diagnostic and prognostic goals of minimally invasive procedures for lung carcinoma.
Authors: Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Hui Chen; Rajesh R Singh; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Jawad Manekia; Bedia A Barkoh; Hui Yao; Sharjeel Sabir; Russell R Broaddus; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Gregg Staerkel; John Stewart; Rajyalakshmi Luthra Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: David M DiBardino; David W Rawson; Anjali Saqi; Jonas J Heymann; Carlos A Pagan; William A Bulman Journal: Cytojournal Date: 2017-03-20 Impact factor: 2.091