H Hetterich1, A Schafnitzel, F Bamberg. 1. Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Campus Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland, Holger.Hetterich@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent multisystemic disorder with numerous potential complications and substantial socioeconomic consequences. In many cases, the patient history, physical examination and laboratory tests are not sufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of complicating disorders. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Imaging modalities, such as sonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are of major significance in the evaluation of complicating disorders of diabetes according to current guidelines. Examples include assessment of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke and diabetic foot syndrome. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Technical developments allow a substantial reduction in radiation dose and scan time in CT and MRI, respectively and could therefore justify a broader application in this patient population. PERFORMANCE: In the future CT and MRI could also be used for the early detection of diabetic complications. Furthermore, they could also be used for risk stratification, e.g. measurement of hepatic fat content and evaluation of atherosclerosis in whole body MRI. ACHIEVEMENTS: Prior to widespread application of advanced imaging techniques in this patient population, improved outcomes with respect to survival, quality of life and cost-effectiveness need to be demonstrated. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of the syndrome complex of diabetic disorders should be used according to the current guidelines but the use is predicted to increase given the high potential in this population.
CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent multisystemic disorder with numerous potential complications and substantial socioeconomic consequences. In many cases, the patient history, physical examination and laboratory tests are not sufficient for a comprehensive evaluation of complicating disorders. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS: Imaging modalities, such as sonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are of major significance in the evaluation of complicating disorders of diabetes according to current guidelines. Examples include assessment of coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke and diabetic foot syndrome. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Technical developments allow a substantial reduction in radiation dose and scan time in CT and MRI, respectively and could therefore justify a broader application in this patient population. PERFORMANCE: In the future CT and MRI could also be used for the early detection of diabetic complications. Furthermore, they could also be used for risk stratification, e.g. measurement of hepatic fat content and evaluation of atherosclerosis in whole body MRI. ACHIEVEMENTS: Prior to widespread application of advanced imaging techniques in this patient population, improved outcomes with respect to survival, quality of life and cost-effectiveness need to be demonstrated. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of the syndrome complex of diabetic disorders should be used according to the current guidelines but the use is predicted to increase given the high potential in this population.
Authors: Lars Rydén; Peter J Grant; Stefan D Anker; Christian Berne; Francesco Cosentino; Nicolas Danchin; Christi Deaton; Javier Escaned; Hans-Peter Hammes; Heikki Huikuri; Michel Marre; Nikolaus Marx; Linda Mellbin; Jan Ostergren; Carlo Patrono; Petar Seferovic; Miguel Sousa Uva; Marja-Riita Taskinen; Michal Tendera; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Paul Valensi; Jose Luis Zamorano; Jose Luis Zamorano; Stephan Achenbach; Helmut Baumgartner; Jeroen J Bax; Héctor Bueno; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Cetin Erol; Robert Fagard; Roberto Ferrari; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Patrizio Lancellotti; Ales Linhart; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Massimo F Piepoli; Piotr Ponikowski; Per Anton Sirnes; Juan Luis Tamargo; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; William Wijns; Stephan Windecker; Guy De Backer; Per Anton Sirnes; Eduardo Alegria Ezquerra; Angelo Avogaro; Lina Badimon; Elena Baranova; Helmut Baumgartner; John Betteridge; Antonio Ceriello; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; Dietrich C Gulba; David Hasdai; Arno W Hoes; John K Kjekshus; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Eli Lev; Christian Mueller; Ludwig Neyses; Peter M Nilsson; Joep Perk; Piotr Ponikowski; Zeljko Reiner; Naveed Sattar; Volker Schächinger; André Scheen; Henrik Schirmer; Anna Strömberg; Svetlana Sudzhaeva; Juan Luis Tamargo; Margus Viigimaa; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Robert G Xuereb Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Fabian Bamberg; Klaus G Parhofer; Elena Lochner; Roy P Marcus; Daniel Theisen; Hannes M Findeisen; Udo Hoffmann; Stefan O Schönberg; Christopher L Schlett; Maximilian F Reiser; Sabine Weckbach Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Leah Iles; Heinz Pfluger; Arintaya Phrommintikul; Joshi Cherayath; Pelin Aksit; Sandeep N Gupta; David M Kaye; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Goodarz Danaei; Mariel M Finucane; Yuan Lu; Gitanjali M Singh; Melanie J Cowan; Christopher J Paciorek; John K Lin; Farshad Farzadfar; Young-Ho Khang; Gretchen A Stevens; Mayuree Rao; Mohammed K Ali; Leanne M Riley; Carolyn A Robinson; Majid Ezzati Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 79.321