| Literature DB >> 25707592 |
Bixia Tang1, Yanqing Wang2, Junwei Zhu2, Wenming Zhao3.
Abstract
An ever-growing number of resources on model organisms have emerged with the continued development of sequencing technologies. In this paper, we review 13 databases of model organisms, most of which are reported by the National Institutes of Health of the United States (NIH; http://www.nih.gov/science/models/). We provide a brief description for each database, as well as detail its data source and types, functions, tools, and availability of access. In addition, we also provide a quality assessment about these databases. Significantly, the organism databases instituted in the early 1990s--such as the Mouse Genome Database (MGD), Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD), and FlyBase--have developed into what are now comprehensive, core authority resources. Furthermore, all of the databases mentioned here update continually according to user feedback and with advancing technologies.Entities:
Keywords: Bioinformatics; Biology; Database; Genome; Model organism
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25707592 PMCID: PMC4411489 DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2015.01.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics ISSN: 1672-0229 Impact factor: 7.691
Major web resources for model organism studies
| MGD | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| RGD | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| SGD | Some browser limitation such as Firefox v35 under Win7 system; low access speed for data; data uploading not supported; abundant effective tools; web page downloading accepted | ★★★☆☆ | ||
| dictyBase | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading not supported; abundant effective tools; web page downloading accepted | ★★★★☆ | ||
| WormBase | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| FlyBase | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading not supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★☆ | ||
| ZFIN | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; web page downloading accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| Xenbase | Well-designed webpage; some problems exist such as wild word search 12∗; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★☆ | ||
| TAIR | Well designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| BeetleBase | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★☆ | ||
| MyMpn | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading not supported; abundant effective tools; web page downloading accepted | ★★★★☆ | ||
| MaizeGDB | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; FTP accepted | ★★★★★ | ||
| ASAP | Well-designed webpage; standard access speed for data; data uploading supported; abundant effective tools; web page downloading accepted | ★★★★★ |
Note: The assessment evidence covers 5 aspects: webpage esthetics, system performance, data sources, software and tools, and data availability. The details are as follows: whether webpage is well designed; whether the accessing speed is acceptable; whether data uploading is supported; whether there are abundant effective tools, and whether instant downloading is supported.