Literature DB >> 25706754

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens for chronic hepatitis C infection: Insights from a work productivity economic model from the United States.

Zobair M Younossi1, Yushan Jiang, Nathaniel J Smith, Maria Stepanova, Rachel Beckerman.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) exhibit reduced work productivity owing to their disease. Historically, most regimens indicated for CHC genotype 1 (GT1) patients were administered with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and/or ribavirin (RBV), which further compromised work productivity during treatment. The aim of this study was to model the impact of LDV/SOF (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), the first Peg-IFN- and RBV-free regimen for CHC GT1 patients, on work productivity from an economic perspective, compared to receiving no treatment. The WPAI-SHP (Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem) questionnaire was administered to patients across the ION clinical trials (N = 1,923 U.S. patients). Before initiation of treatment, patients with CHC GT1 in the ION trials exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.57% and 7.58%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis exhibited greater work productivity impairment than patients without cirrhosis. In total, 93.21% of U.S. patients in the ION trials achieved SVR; these patients exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.62% (P = 0.76, when compared to baseline) and 3.53% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Monetizing these data to the entire U.S. population, our model projects an annual societal cost of $7.1 billion owing to productivity loss in untreated GT1 CHC patients. Our model projects that, when compared to no treatment, treating all CHC GT1 patients with a regimen with very high viral eradication rates (LDV/SOF) would translate to annual productivity loss savings of $2.7 billion over a 1-year time horizon.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with untreated HCV impose a substantial societal burden owing to reduced work productivity. As a result of improvements in work productivity, treatment of CHC GT1 patients with LDV/SOF-based regimens is likely to result in significant cost savings from a societal perspective, relative to no treatment.
© 2015 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25706754     DOI: 10.1002/hep.27757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  12 in total

1.  Hepatitis C Guidance 2018 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Hepatitis C virus: A time for decisions. Who should be treated and when?

Authors:  Bashar M Attar; David H Van Thiel
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-02-06

Review 3.  The changing landscape of hepatitis C virus therapy: focus on interferon-free treatment.

Authors:  Brian P Lam; Thomas Jeffers; Zahra Younoszai; Yousef Fazel; Zobair M Younossi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  An In-Depth Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Different Anti-Viral Regimens.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Maria Stepanova; Linda Henry; Fatema Nader; Sharon Hunt
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Should Family Physicians Routinely Screen Patients for Hepatitis C? Yes: Screening Makes Sense for High-Risk Adults.

Authors:  Marc G Ghany
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 3.292

6.  Scenarios to manage the hepatitis C disease burden and associated economic impact of treatment in Turkey.

Authors:  Necati Örmeci; Simten Malhan; İsmail Balık; Gül Ergör; Homie Razavi; Sarah Robbins
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 6.047

7.  The International development of PROQOL-HCV: An instrument to assess the health-related quality of life of patients treated for Hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  Andrew Richard Armstrong; Susan Elizabeth Herrmann; Olivier Chassany; Christophe Lalanne; Mariliza Henrique Da Silva; Eliana Galano; Patrizia M Carrieri; Vincent Estellon; Philippe Sogni; Martin Duracinsky
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  A real-world intention-to-treat analysis of a decade's experience of treatment of hepatitis C with interferon-based therapies.

Authors:  Nowlan Selvapatt; Ashley Brown
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-08-24

9.  Budgetary impact analysis of a primary care-based hepatitis C treatment program: Effects of 340B Drug Pricing Program.

Authors:  Eric A Jones; Benjamin P Linas; Ve Truong; James F Burgess; Karen E Lasser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Patient-reported Outcomes in Asian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Maria Stepanova; Henry L Y Chan; Mei H Lee; Ming-Lung Yu; Yock Y Dan; Moon S Choi; Linda Henry
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.