Necati Örmeci1, Simten Malhan2, İsmail Balık3, Gül Ergör4, Homie Razavi5, Sarah Robbins5. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. normeci@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Health Care Management, Başkent University Ankara, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Public Health and Epidemiology, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey. 5. Center for Disease Analysis, Lafayette, CO, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant health problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment and estimate its economic burden in Turkey. METHODS: An Excel-based disease progression model was used to estimate the HCV-infected population for 2015-2030. Direct costs in US dollars (USD) including diagnostic, laboratory, and healthcare costs were provided by experts in the country. Indirect costs were estimated as lost productivity using the World Health Organization (WHO) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) metric from the Global Burden of Disease study. Three scenarios were developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment through 2030: Base 2016, Increase Treatment and SVR (where SVR is sustained virological response), and WHO Targets. Additionally, the WHO Targets scenario was assessed at three different treatment price points: 10,900 USD, 16,730 USD (base cost), and 27,285 USD. RESULTS: Cumulative total direct and indirect costs (2015-2030) for the WHO Targets scenario were estimated to be 10.8 billion USD, or a 1.5 % increase compared with Base 2016. However, by the following decade, due to a marked decline in DALYs, cumulative direct and indirect costs were estimated to be 45 % less when compared with Base 2016. At a threshold of 9125 USD, all scenarios were cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: By implementing the WHO Targets scenario, Turkey would be able to lower HCV prevalence by 80 % and reduce the total number of liver-related deaths by >65 % by 2030. Treating HCV infection in the country is cost-effective if healthcare and indirect costs are taken into consideration.
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant health problem. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment and estimate its economic burden in Turkey. METHODS: An Excel-based disease progression model was used to estimate the HCV-infected population for 2015-2030. Direct costs in US dollars (USD) including diagnostic, laboratory, and healthcare costs were provided by experts in the country. Indirect costs were estimated as lost productivity using the World Health Organization (WHO) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) metric from the Global Burden of Disease study. Three scenarios were developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of HCV treatment through 2030: Base 2016, Increase Treatment and SVR (where SVR is sustained virological response), and WHO Targets. Additionally, the WHO Targets scenario was assessed at three different treatment price points: 10,900 USD, 16,730 USD (base cost), and 27,285 USD. RESULTS: Cumulative total direct and indirect costs (2015-2030) for the WHO Targets scenario were estimated to be 10.8 billion USD, or a 1.5 % increase compared with Base 2016. However, by the following decade, due to a marked decline in DALYs, cumulative direct and indirect costs were estimated to be 45 % less when compared with Base 2016. At a threshold of 9125 USD, all scenarios were cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: By implementing the WHO Targets scenario, Turkey would be able to lower HCV prevalence by 80 % and reduce the total number of liver-related deaths by >65 % by 2030. Treating HCV infection in the country is cost-effective if healthcare and indirect costs are taken into consideration.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost-effectiveness; Economic impact; HCV; Treatment; WHO Targets
Authors: Stefan Zeuzem; Ira M Jacobson; Tolga Baykal; Rui T Marinho; Fred Poordad; Marc Bourlière; Mark S Sulkowski; Heiner Wedemeyer; Edward Tam; Paul Desmond; Donald M Jensen; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Peter Varunok; Tarek Hassanein; Junyuan Xiong; Tami Pilot-Matias; Barbara DaSilva-Tillmann; Lois Larsen; Thomas Podsadecki; Barry Bernstein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nezam Afdhal; Stefan Zeuzem; Paul Kwo; Mario Chojkier; Norman Gitlin; Massimo Puoti; Manuel Romero-Gomez; Jean-Pierre Zarski; Kosh Agarwal; Peter Buggisch; Graham R Foster; Norbert Bräu; Maria Buti; Ira M Jacobson; G Mani Subramanian; Xiao Ding; Hongmei Mo; Jenny C Yang; Phillip S Pang; William T Symonds; John G McHutchison; Andrew J Muir; Alessandra Mangia; Patrick Marcellin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nezam Afdhal; K Rajender Reddy; David R Nelson; Eric Lawitz; Stuart C Gordon; Eugene Schiff; Ronald Nahass; Reem Ghalib; Norman Gitlin; Robert Herring; Jacob Lalezari; Ziad H Younes; Paul J Pockros; Adrian M Di Bisceglie; Sanjeev Arora; G Mani Subramanian; Yanni Zhu; Hadas Dvory-Sobol; Jenny C Yang; Phillip S Pang; William T Symonds; John G McHutchison; Andrew J Muir; Mark Sulkowski; Paul Kwo Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 91.245