Brad S Metcalf1, Joanne Hosking, Alison N Jeffery, William E Henley, Terence J Wilkin. 1. 1Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UNITED KINGDOM; 2Sport and Health Science, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UNITED KINGDOM; and 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University Plymouth, UNITED KINGDOM.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Contemporary adolescents are deemed inactive, especially girls, but whether for biological reasons associated with their maturation, changes in their behavior or because of environmental constraints, is uncertain. We examined the trends in physical activity (PA) in relation to both biological and environmental factors in an attempt to establish what drives activity patterns from childhood through adolescence. METHODS: Physical activity (7-d Actigraph accelerometry) was measured annually from 5 to 15 yr in a single cohort of some 300 UK children. Total PA (TPA; in-school and out-of-school separately and combined as whole day) and intensity-specific PA (sedentary, light, and moderate-and-vigorous [MVPA]) were analyzed. Biological age (years before/after measured peak height velocity) and pubertal stage (self-reported pubic hair development-Tanner staging) were also measured as was socioeconomic status (postcode-derived index of multiple deprivation [IMD]). RESULTS: Total PA was stable from 5 to 8 yr (trend P = 0.10) but fell progressively from 9 to 15 yr (by approximately 30% in girls and approximately 20% in boys, both P < 0.001; sex interaction, P < 0.01). Half of this fall was attributable to light intensity PA and only a quarter to MVPA. The decline in PA was related similarly to chronological and biological age, whereas pubertal stage explained the more rapid PA decline in girls (puberty-adjusted sex interaction, P = 0.51). Total PA fell to the same extent for in-school and out-of-school settings (both P < 0.001), and for lower and higher IMD areas (both P < 0.001). Total PA tracked moderately to strongly from childhood into adolescence (r = 0.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The adolescent decline in PA is consistent across different environmental settings, attributable to falls in light-intensity/habitual activity and influenced by puberty, suggesting that the inactivity of adolescence may, in part, be under biological control.
INTRODUCTION: Contemporary adolescents are deemed inactive, especially girls, but whether for biological reasons associated with their maturation, changes in their behavior or because of environmental constraints, is uncertain. We examined the trends in physical activity (PA) in relation to both biological and environmental factors in an attempt to establish what drives activity patterns from childhood through adolescence. METHODS: Physical activity (7-d Actigraph accelerometry) was measured annually from 5 to 15 yr in a single cohort of some 300 UK children. Total PA (TPA; in-school and out-of-school separately and combined as whole day) and intensity-specific PA (sedentary, light, and moderate-and-vigorous [MVPA]) were analyzed. Biological age (years before/after measured peak height velocity) and pubertal stage (self-reported pubic hair development-Tanner staging) were also measured as was socioeconomic status (postcode-derived index of multiple deprivation [IMD]). RESULTS: Total PA was stable from 5 to 8 yr (trend P = 0.10) but fell progressively from 9 to 15 yr (by approximately 30% in girls and approximately 20% in boys, both P < 0.001; sex interaction, P < 0.01). Half of this fall was attributable to light intensity PA and only a quarter to MVPA. The decline in PA was related similarly to chronological and biological age, whereas pubertal stage explained the more rapid PA decline in girls (puberty-adjusted sex interaction, P = 0.51). Total PA fell to the same extent for in-school and out-of-school settings (both P < 0.001), and for lower and higher IMD areas (both P < 0.001). Total PA tracked moderately to strongly from childhood into adolescence (r = 0.58; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The adolescent decline in PA is consistent across different environmental settings, attributable to falls in light-intensity/habitual activity and influenced by puberty, suggesting that the inactivity of adolescence may, in part, be under biological control.
Authors: Nicole Zarrett; Lauren H Law; Dawn K Wilson; Michelle Abraczinskas; Stephen Taylor; Brittany S Cook; Alex Roberts Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2021-03-07
Authors: Rachel Sutherland; Elizabeth Campbell; David R Lubans; Philip J Morgan; Anthony D Okely; Nicole Nathan; Luke Wolfenden; Jarrod Wiese; Karen Gillham; Jenna Hollis; John Wiggers Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Peter Pagels; Anders Raustorp; Peter Guban; Andreas Fröberg; Cecilia Boldemann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 3.390