Literature DB >> 25705331

A comparison of computed tomography measures for diagnosing cervical spinal stenosis associated with myelopathy: a case-control study.

Brett A Freedman1, C Edward Hoffler2, Brian M Cameron1, John M Rhee2, Maneesh Bawa2, David G Malone1, Melissa Bent2, Tim S Yoon2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study.
PURPOSE: To assess differences in computed tomography (CT) imaging parameters between patients with cervical myelopathy and controls. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There is a lack of information regarding the best predictor of symptomatic stenosis based on osseous canal dimensions. We postulate that smaller osseous canal dimensions increase the risk of symptomatic central stenosis.
METHODS: CT images and medical records of patients with cervical myelopathy (19 patients, 8 males; average age, 64.4±13.4 years) and controls (18 patients, 14 males; average age, 60.4±11.0 years) were collected. A new measure called the laminar roof pitch angle (=angle between the lamina) was conducted along with linear measures, ratios and surrogates of canal perimeter and area at each level C2-C7 (222 levels). Receiver-operator curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of each. Rater reliability was assessed for the measures.
RESULTS: The medial-lateral (ML) diameter (at mid-pedicle level) and calculated canal area (=anterior-posterior.×ML diameters) were the most accurate and highly reliable. ML diameter below 23.5 mm and calculated canal area below 300 mm(2) generated 82% to 84% sensitivity and 67% to 68% sensitivity. No significant correlations were identified between age, height, weight, body mass in dex and gender for each of the CT measures.
CONCLUSIONS: CT measures including ML dimensions were most predictive. This study is the first to identify an important role for the ML dimension in cases of slowly progressive compressive myelopathy. A ML reserve may be protective when the canal is progressively compromised in the anterior-posterior dimension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cord; Cervicle vertebrae; Spinal cord compression; Spinal cord diseae; Spinal stenosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 25705331      PMCID: PMC4330215          DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.1.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Spine J        ISSN: 1976-1902


  14 in total

1.  DEVELOPMENTAL STENOSIS OF THE CERVICAL SPINAL CANAL. RADIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  V C HINCK; P D GORDY; H E STORINO
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  E E PAYNE; J D SPILLANE
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 3.  Cervical spondylosis anatomy: pathophysiology and biomechanics.

Authors:  Daniel Shedid; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the cervical spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord-injured patients.

Authors:  P Matsuura; R L Waters; R H Adkins; S Rothman; N Gurbani; I Sie
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Microvasculature of the human spinal cord.

Authors:  I M Turnbull
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Cervical myelopathy and its relationship to cervical stenosis.

Authors:  O F Veidlinger; J C Colwill; H S Smyth; D Turner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The relationship of developmental narrowing of the cervical spinal canal to reversible and irreversible injury of the cervical spinal cord in football players.

Authors:  J S Torg; R J Naranja; H Pavlov; B J Galinat; R Warren; R A Stine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players. Plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R J Herzog; J J Wiens; M F Dillingham; M J Sontag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Measurement of cervical canal sagittal diameter in Chinese males with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  I H Chen; K K Liao; W Y Shen
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei)       Date:  1994-08

10.  Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Jin-Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of inter- and intra-observer reliability among the three classification systems for cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Wonkee Choi; Seungbum Chae
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of Anterior and Posterior Approaches for Acute Traumatic Central Spinal Cord Syndrome with Multilevel Cervical Canal Stenosis without Cervical Fracture or Dislocation.

Authors:  Quan Zhou; Junxin Zhang; Hao Liu; Xinfeng Zhou; Wei He; Zheyu Jin; Huilin Yang; Tao Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.149

3.  Morphometric Analysis of the Cervical Canal Using Computed Tomography Scan Among Patients With Neck Pain in North India.

Authors:  Kanhaiya Jee; Yogesh Yadav; Nisha V Kaul; Harshita Pant
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-05-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.