Literature DB >> 1862411

Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players. Plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.

R J Herzog1, J J Wiens, M F Dillingham, M J Sontag.   

Abstract

Diagnosis of cervical spinal stenosis or instability rests on the objective findings depicted on static and dynamic radiographs. Before abnormal spinal morphometry can be determined, it is first necessary to establish normal values for the specific patient population being evaluated. Several studies have attempted to establish norms for plain film measurements of the cervical spine in children and adults, but few have applied consistent methods for generating precise measurements. The first part of this study established normal values for cervical spinal morphometry and segmental spinal motion in the elite athlete. The second part of this study determined the most accurate screening method for detecting cervical spinal stenosis. Three sagittal diameters of the cervical spinal canal were compared to determine which represented the smallest midline diameter on static and dynamic radiographs. The Torg ratio was also evaluated as a method to detect significant cervical spinal stenosis and was shown to have a high sensitivity but poor positive predictive value. The study clarified why the ratio yields a large number of false positive cases. From the results of this study, an algorithm has been developed for the evaluation of stenosis of the cervical spine in athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1862411     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  34 in total

1.  Cervical Spine Stenosis Measures in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Ryan T Tierney; Catherine Maldjian; Carl G Mattacola; Stephen J Straub; Michael R Sitler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Rugby union injuries to the cervical spine and spinal cord.

Authors:  Kenneth L Quarrie; Robert C Cantu; David J Chalmers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Cervical spinal canal stenosis: the differences between stenosis at the lower cervical and multiple segment levels.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Masatoshi Naito; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The morphological and clinical significance of developmental cervical stenosis.

Authors:  Miao Yu; Yanchao Tang; Zhongjun Liu; Yu Sun; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  MRI Study on Spinal Canal Morphometry: An Indian Study.

Authors:  Maitreyee Kar; Dipankar Bhaumik; Kaushik Ishore; Pallab Kumar Saha
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

6.  Prognostic factors in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Byung-Wan Choi; Chan-Il Park; Kwang-Bok Lee
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-05-22

7.  A practical radiographic visual estimation technique for the prediction of developmental narrowing of cervical spinal canal.

Authors:  Erdem Toslak Iclal; Laurie M Lomasney; Nathaniel S Jones; Bartosz Wojewnik; Amany Aziz; Khalid Alsabban; William Adams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Clinical evidence for cervical myelopathy due to Chiari malformation and spinal stenosis in a non-randomized group of patients with the diagnosis of fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Dan S Heffez; Ruth E Ross; Yvonne Shade-Zeldow; Konstantinos Kostas; Sagar Shah; Robert Gottschalk; Dean A Elias; Alan Shepard; Sue E Leurgans; Charity G Moore
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Cervical spine injuries in American football.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; David T Anderson; Kathleen Lamb; Peter F Deluca; Ahmed Bata; Paul A Marchetto; Nuno Neves; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Reevaluation of the Pavlov ratio in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Kyung-Soo Suk; Ki-Tack Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Sang-Hun Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Jin-Young Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.