Literature DB >> 25704858

Evaluating the efficiency of isotope transmission for improved panel design and a comparison of the detection sensitivities of mass cytometer instruments.

Sabine Tricot1, Mickael Meyrand, Chiara Sammicheli, Jamila Elhmouzi-Younes, Aurélien Corneau, Sylvie Bertholet, Marie Malissen, Roger Le Grand, Sandra Nuti, Hervé Luche, Antonio Cosma.   

Abstract

The recent introduction of mass cytometry, a technique coupling a cell introduction system generating a stream of single cells with mass spectrometry, has greatly increased the number of parameters that can be measured per single cell. As with all new technology there is a need for dissemination of standardization and quality control procedures. Here, we characterize variations in sensitivity observed across the mass range of a mass cytometer, using different lanthanide tags. We observed a five-fold difference in lanthanide detection over the mass range and demonstrated that each instrument has its own sensitivity pattern. Therefore, the selection of lanthanide combinations is a key step in the establishment of a staining panel for mass cytometry-based experiments, particularly for multicenter studies. We propose the sensitivity pattern as the basis for panel design, instrument standardization and future implementation of normalization algorithms.
© 2015 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CyTOF; Key terms: mass cytometry; flow cytometry; standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25704858     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.22648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry A        ISSN: 1552-4922            Impact factor:   4.355


  19 in total

1.  Atomic mass tag of bismuth-209 for increasing the immunoassay multiplexing capacity of mass cytometry.

Authors:  Guojun Han; Shih-Yu Chen; Veronica D Gonzalez; Eli R Zunder; Wendy J Fantl; Garry P Nolan
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 2.  Mass Cytometry: Single Cells, Many Features.

Authors:  Matthew H Spitzer; Garry P Nolan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Beyond the message: advantages of snapshot proteomics with single-cell mass cytometry in solid tumors.

Authors:  Akshitkumar M Mistry; Allison R Greenplate; Rebecca A Ihrie; Jonathan M Irish
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 4.  Single cell proteomics in biomedicine: High-dimensional data acquisition, visualization, and analysis.

Authors:  Yapeng Su; Qihui Shi; Wei Wei
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.984

5.  Implementing Mass Cytometry at the Bedside to Study the Immunological Basis of Human Diseases: Distinctive Immune Features in Patients with a History of Term or Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Brice Gaudillière; Edward A Ganio; Martha Tingle; Hope L Lancero; Gabriela K Fragiadakis; Quentin J Baca; Nima Aghaeepour; Ronald J Wong; Cele Quaintance; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Gary M Shaw; David B Lewis; David K Stevenson; Garry P Nolan; Martin S Angst
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.355

6.  High standards for high dimensional investigations.

Authors:  Ruth R Montgomery
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.355

7.  Standardization and quality control for high-dimensional mass cytometry studies of human samples.

Authors:  Katja Kleinsteuber; Björn Corleis; Narges Rashidi; Nzuekoh Nchinda; Antonella Lisanti; Josalyn L Cho; Benjamin D Medoff; Douglas Kwon; Bruce D Walker
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.355

8.  Multiparameter analysis of stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: A comparison of mass and fluorescence cytometry.

Authors:  Katherine J Nicholas; Allison R Greenplate; David K Flaherty; Brittany K Matlock; Juan San Juan; Rita M Smith; Jonathan M Irish; Spyros A Kalams
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.355

9.  Metal-isotope-tagged monoclonal antibodies for high-dimensional mass cytometry.

Authors:  Guojun Han; Matthew H Spitzer; Sean C Bendall; Wendy J Fantl; Garry P Nolan
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 13.491

10.  Immune Profiling Mass Cytometry Assay Harmonization: Multicenter Experience from CIMAC-CIDC.

Authors:  Bita Sahaf; Mina Pichavant; Brian H Lee; Caroline Duault; Emily M Thrash; Melanie Davila; Nicolas Fernandez; Karen Millerchip; Salah-Eddine Bentebibel; Cara Haymaker; Natalia Sigal; Diane M Del Valle; Srinika Ranasinghe; Sarah Fayle; Beatriz Sanchez-Espiridion; Jiexin Zhang; Chantale Bernatchez; Catherine J Wu; Ignacio I Wistuba; Seunghee Kim-Schulze; Sacha Gnjatic; Sean C Bendall; Minkyung Song; Magdalena Thurin; J Jack Lee; Holden T Maecker; Adeeb Rahman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.