| Literature DB >> 25703704 |
Adéla Nacer1,2,3, Aurélie Claes1,2,3, Amy Roberts1,2,3, Christine Scheidig-Benatar1,2,3, Hiroshi Sakamoto1,2,3, Mehdi Ghorbal1,2, Jose-Juan Lopez-Rubio1,2, Denise Mattei1,2,3.
Abstract
Plasmodium falciparum virulence is linked to its ability to sequester in post-capillary venules in the human host. Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) is the main variant surface antigen implicated in this process. Complete loss of parasite adhesion is linked to a large subtelomeric deletion on chromosome 9 in a number of laboratory strains such as D10 and T9-96. Similar to the cytoadherent reference line FCR3, D10 strain expresses PfEMP1 on the surface of parasitized erythrocytes, however without any detectable cytoadhesion. To investigate which of the deleted subtelomeric genes may be implicated in parasite adhesion, we selected 12 genes for D10 complementation studies that are predicted to code for proteins exported to the red blood cell. We identified a novel single copy gene (PF3D7_0936500) restricted to P. falciparum that restores adhesion to CD36, termed here virulence-associated protein 1 (Pfvap1). Protein knockdown and gene knockout experiments confirmed a role of PfVAP1 in the adhesion process in FCR3 parasites. PfVAP1 is co-exported with PfEMP1 into the host cell via vesicle-like structures called Maurer's clefts. This study identifies a novel highly conserved parasite molecule that contributes to parasite virulence possibly by assisting PfEMP1 to establish functional adhesion at the host cell surface.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25703704 PMCID: PMC4654329 DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Microbiol ISSN: 1462-5814 Impact factor: 3.715
Fig. 1Complementation analysis identified a novel gene that restores adhesion in D10.A. Synchronized FCR3 and D10 parasites (30–35 h) were labelled with a pool of hyperimmune human sera followed by an anti-human IgG Alexa 488 secondary antibody (green). Fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry and imaged by fluorescence microscopy (inset).B. Schematic representation of the chromosome 9 deletion in P. falciparum D10 (D10) compared with P. falciparum 3D7 (3D7). Complementation of D10 using episomal expression of candidate genes (shown in back boxes).C. A transcript of ∼2.3 kb was detected in asynchronous cultures of P. falciparum FCR3 and 3D7.D. qRT-PCR analysis of synchronized FCR3 parasites showed maximal expression in ring stage parasites. Y-axis relative copy number normalized against seryl transferase and inositol. X-axis age of parasites (hours post-invasion).
Fig. 2PfVAP1 partially restores binding to CD36.A. Complementation of D10 with PfVAP1 (episome) leads to a > 20-fold increase in binding.B. Binding of FCR3, 3D7 and D10 to purified CD36. Binding assays performed in duplicate wells spotted with either CD36 or BSA. Error bars (SD) are shown. FCR3 (n = 5), 3D7 (n = 2), D10 (n = 6) and D10 (n = 10) replicates. D10 complemented with PfVAP1 or PfVAP1-Ty1 binds similarly to CD36. Binding assays were performed following four rounds of panning on CD36 purified CD36 or BSA. Error bars represent the standard deviation.C. Diagram showing the position of restriction sites for DraI and XmnI used for digestion of the genomic DNA of complemented D10. Southern blot confirming the complementation of D10 with Pfvap1. Genomic DNAs were digested with DraI (lane 1), XmnI (lane 2), DraI + XmnI (lane 3) or not digested (lane 4). Complemented D10 parasites, D10 and FCR3 are shown. The absence of a reaction on D10 confirmed the specificity of the probe.D. Diagram of PfVAP1 showing the predicted protein structure of the 31.1 kDa protein: the N-terminal transmembrane domain precedes the PEXEL and signal sequence. Two transmembrane domains are predicted in the C-terminus between amino acids 168–182 and 188–206.
Fig. 3Localization of PfVAP1 in complemented D10 parasites. Ty1-tagged D10 parasites were labelled with anti-Ty1 monoclonal antibody to determine the localization of the protein. In early trophozoites PfVAP1 is associated with the parasitophorous vacuole (PV) as determined by double labelling with PfEXP1. It is then trafficked via the Maurer's clefts (PfSBP1) to the infected erythrocyte membrane. In the Maurer's clefts, PfVAP1 co-localizes with PfEMP1 (third row) and appears to localize in distinct regions, separate from PfEMP1 at the erythrocyte membrane (fourth row). Scale bars = 5 μm.
Fig. 4Knockdown of PfVAP1 reduces binding to CD36.A. Schematic representation of the knockdown (KD) strategy. Primer locations are indicated by arrows and numbered (e.g. p1). Expected amplicons are shown for the different primer pairs used.B. Integration of the PfVAP1-DD-HA in FCR3. Genomic DNA was used for PCR with the indicated primer pairs. Genomic DNA from parasites obtained from a control transfection with empty plasmid is shown.C. Binding of FCR3 KD. FCR3 KD parasites were cultured in the presence or absence of the drug TMP that stabilizes the degradation domain. A 50% reduction in binding was observed in FCR3 parasites without TMP. Mean binding of infected erythrocytes (IE) to purified CD36 and BSA is shown. Error bars = r standard deviation, n = 4 replicates). No effect of TMP on binding was detected using vector-transfected FCR3 parasites (data not shown). The inset shows Giemsa staining of FCR3 (+ /− TMP) bound to CD36 or the BSA negative control showing the effect of PfVAP1 in adhesion.D. Western blot of FCR3 parasites cultured in the presence (+) or absence (−) of TMP probed with anti-HA. A band of the expected molecular weight (52 kDA) corresponding the PfVAP1+HA fusion protein is observed in the presence of TMP that is lacking in the absence of TMP, confirming the degradation of the protein.
Fig. 5FCR31Δ knockout parasites show a reduction in cytoadhesion.A. Diagram depicting the cas9/CRISPR strategy (Ghorbal et al., 2014) used for disruption of Pfvap1 in FCR3 parasites. Only the pL7 plasmid carrying the Pfvap1-specific guide RNA and homology boxes is shown. The position of primers is shown (arrows) and each primer (p) is numbered. The expected amplicon sizes for PCR verification are shown. Gene replacement with hDHFR was verified by PCR (left). In FCR3 parasites, part of the 5′UTR sequence is lost (p3), the absence of this sequence used to select two KO clones (right).B. Binding of FCR3Δ knockout clones panned on CD36. A 40% reduction in binding was observed in FCR3Δ clone B6 (dark grey). Binding to CD36 was reduced by 50% in the C7 clone (light grey). Mean binding of IE mm−2 to purified CD36 and BSA is shown. Error bars = o standard deviation, n = 3 replicates.C. FCR3Δ parasites export PfEMP1 and KAHRP in a manner comparable with wild-type FCR3 parasites, suggesting that there is no impairment or retention of these proteins in mutant parasites. Scale bar = 5 μm.
Fig. 6Trypsin sensitivity of PfEMP1 in FCR3Δ parasites. Synchronized FCR3 wild type and FCR3Δ parasites (30–35 h) were selected by gel floatation prior to trypsin. Parasites were treated with either 0, 10 or 100 μg ml−1 trypsin. The Triton X-100 insoluble/SDS soluble protein fraction was collected and separated by SDS-PAGE. A guinea pig anti-ATS antibody was used to detect PfEMP1. Treatment with trypsin results in the detection of an additional band (arrow) that represents the trypsin-resistant intracellular ATS domain. The membrane was then probed with the Hsp70 monoclonal antibody MAb1C11 as a loading control (bottom lane).